NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compare to the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q in raw compute performance?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q delivers 109.7 TFLOPS FP32 versus 17.04 TFLOPS for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, a 6.4x advantage. The RTX PRO 6000 also leads in texture rate at 1,714.6 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s and pixel rate at 437.8 GPixel/s versus 115.8 GPixel/s.

Q: Which GPU has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q features 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the benchmark percentiles for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits at the 80th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 35,435. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q is at the 50th percentile with an average score of 11,088, based on a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 2.1% ahead of the NVIDIA A2, 0.2% behind the NVIDIA Quadro GV100, 1.2% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Duo, and 2.4% behind the NVIDIA T1000 in average benchmark score.

Q: What is the process node and die size difference?

A: Both GPUs use a 5 nm TSMC process. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 263 mm² die with 31,100 million transistors, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q has a 750 mm² die with 92,200 million transistors.

Q: What is the TDP and power configuration difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 60 W TDP with no power connectors (IGP form factor). The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q has a 300 W TDP, uses a dual-slot design with a single 16-pin connector, and suggests a 700 W PSU.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs share the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and are built by TSMC on a 5 nm process, but they diverge significantly in chip design and scale. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q uses the GB202 chip. The GB202 is substantially larger at 750 mm² versus 263 mm², and packs 92,200 million transistors compared to 31,100 million. Transistor density is slightly higher on the GB202 at 122.9M per mm² versus 118.3M per mm².

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q carries 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, and 192 ROPs. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware follows the same ratio: the RTX PRO 6000 has 188 RT cores and 752 tensor cores, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores.

Clock behavior differs noticeably. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q has a base clock of 1,035 MHz and a boost clock of 2,280 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile operates at a 847 MHz base and 1,447 MHz boost. Memory clock is identical at 1,750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), but the bus width and capacity diverge: 512-bit with 96 GB versus 192-bit with 12 GB, both using GDDR7.

The form factors reflect their intended deployment. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an IGP with no power connectors, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm, requiring a 16-pin connector and a 700 W suggested PSU. Both use PCIe 5.0 x16 and support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs differ: the RTX PRO 6000 provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the mobile part is portable device dependent.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two GPUs. The available measurements cover different test suites, so a direct comparison must rely on the aggregate scores and percentile positions recorded for each.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a comprehensive benchmark record across nine tests. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 143,870 and Geekbench Vulkan is 139,213. PassMark results show 151 for DirectX 10, 237 for DirectX 11, 102 for DirectX 12, and 259 for DirectX 9. The 2D score is 981, the 3D score is 24,004, and the GPU compute score is 10,101. These results produce an average benchmark score of 35,435, placing it at the 80th percentile.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q has a single recorded benchmark: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 11,088. That result yields an average score of 11,088 and a 50th percentile position. The average score difference is substantial, with the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile exceeding the RTX PRO 6000 by 24,347 points.

The nearest rival data for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile indicates it is competitive with professional workstation cards from the prior generation. It trails the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 by 0.2% (35,520 versus 35,435), trails the AMD Radeon Pro Duo by 1.2% (35,860 versus 35,435), and trails the NVIDIA T1000 by 2.4% (36,289 versus 35,435). It leads the NVIDIA A2 by 2.1% (34,690 versus 35,435).

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q sits in a different performance neighborhood. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q with an identical average score of 11,088 and 0% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 550 is 0.1% ahead at 11,075, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 0.4% ahead at 11,047, and the AMD FirePro W4300 is 1.2% ahead at 11,225.

The recorded data indicates the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a much higher aggregate benchmark score, but the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q was only tested in a single demanding DX12 workload. That single 3DMark Steel Nomad result does not cover the same breadth of tests as the nine benchmarks logged for the mobile part, so the average scores are not directly comparable across the full workload spectrum.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB205 | GB202 |

| Transistors | 31,100 million | 92,200 million |

| Die Size | 263 mm² | 750 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 118.3M / mm² | 122.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 847 MHz | 1,035 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1,447 MHz | 2,280 MHz |

| Memory Size | 12 GB | 96 GB |

| Memory Bus | 192 bit | 512 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | 1.79 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 5,888 | 24,064 |

| TMUs | 184 | 752 |

| ROPs | 80 | 192 |

| RT Cores | 46 | 188 |

| Tensor Cores | 184 | 752 |

| Pixel Rate | 115.8 GPixel/s | 437.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 266.2 GTexel/s | 1,714.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 17.04 TFLOPS | 109.7 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) | 109.7 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 60 W | 300 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 700 W |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | None | 267 mm x 111 mm x 40 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-02-28 | 2025-03-17 |

| Launch MSRP | None | 8,565 USD |

The specification table shows both GPUs share the same architecture, process node, foundry, memory type, memory clock, bus interface, and API support. The differences concentrate in compute resources, memory subsystem, clock speeds, and physical design.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins decisively in aggregate benchmark performance. Its average score of 35,435 across nine tests places it at the 80th percentile, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q records an 11,088 average from one test at the 50th percentile. The mobile GPU shows strength across a broad range of APIs, from DirectX 9 at 259 to DirectX 11 at 237, DirectX 12 at 102, and DirectX 10 at 151. Its Geekbench scores of 143,870 OpenCL and 139,213 Vulkan indicate strong compute and graphics API performance in portable form.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q wins on raw hardware capability. Its 109.7 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is 6.4x the mobile part, and its 1,714.6 GTexel/s texture rate is 6.4x higher. The 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth is 2.7x the mobile GPU's 672.0 GB/s, and the 96 GB capacity is 8x larger. The 188 RT cores and 752 tensor cores dwarf the 46 and 184 found in the mobile chip. The 300 W TDP and 700 W suggested PSU indicate a desktop-class power envelope.

For portable gaming and general mobile graphics workloads, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers superior measured performance per the database. Its 80th percentile rank and competitive position against workstation GPUs like the Quadro GV100 and T1000 confirm it handles a wide range of tasks effectively within a 60 W power budget. The IGP form factor and lack of external power connectors make it suitable for laptops.

For large-scale professional compute, memory-intensive rendering, or multi-display workstation use, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q provides the necessary resources. The 96 GB VRAM and 512-bit bus support massive datasets that would exceed the 12 GB mobile memory. The 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs and dual-slot design fit a stationary workstation. Its single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 11,088 represents a specific high-end workload, and the nearest rival data shows it aligns with lower-tier GPUs in that particular test, but the hardware specifications point to a different performance class for compute-heavy tasks.

The data does not provide enough overlapping benchmarks to declare a single winner across all scenarios. The mobile GPU's broad benchmark suite shows versatility, while the RTX PRO 6000's hardware specifications indicate a specialized, high-capacity compute orientation.