NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

CORE STATE GB205
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1447 MHz
TDP 60 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A1000

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1462 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
143,870
52,078
geekbench_vulkan
139,213
49,574
passmark_directx_10
151
N/A
passmark_directx_11
237
N/A
passmark_directx_12
102
N/A
passmark_directx_9
259
N/A
passmark_g2d
981
N/A
passmark_g3d
24,004
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
10,101
N/A
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
969

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and the NVIDIA RTX A1000 occupy opposite ends of the laptop GPU spectrum, and the benchmark data reflects that divide clearly. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a high-performance Blackwell-based part for gaming and creative workloads, while the RTX A1000 is a low-power Ampere workstation card designed for professional ISV tasks. Based strictly on the data, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins every head-to-head benchmark by a massive margin, but the RTX A1000’s smaller footprint and lower power draw make it a distinct alternative for specific use cases.

The Verdict

The data points to a decisive winner for raw performance: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. In the two shared benchmarks, it leads by 176.3% in Geekbench OpenCL and 180.8% in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score of 35,435 places it in the 80th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX A1000’s average of 34,207 sits just below at the 79th percentile. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also has more than double the shading units (5,888 vs 2,304) and nearly 3.5x the FP32 throughput (17.04 TFLOPS vs 6.737 TFLOPS), so any workload that scales with compute will favor it.

However, the RTX A1000 is not without merit. Its 50 W TDP versus the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 60 W TDP, combined with a single-slot, 163 mm length design and four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, makes it a fit for compact workstations or multi-GPU configurations where space and power are constrained. The RTX A1000 also uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16, but the latter’s IGP (integrated) form factor and "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs mean it is not a drop-in standalone card. In short: pick the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile for maximum compute and graphics performance in a laptop; pick the RTX A1000 for a low-profile, low-power professional card with standard display outputs.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is generational. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It packs 31,100 million transistors into a 263 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.3M / mm². In contrast, the RTX A1000 relies on the GA107 chip with Ampere architecture, manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process. It contains only 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, with a density of 43.5M / mm². The process advantage alone explains much of the performance difference.

Memory subsystems also diverge sharply. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX A1000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding just 192.0 GB/s. That’s a 3.5x bandwidth advantage for the newer card. Clock speeds are closer: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile boosts to 1447 MHz from a base of 847 MHz, while the RTX A1000 boosts to 1462 MHz from 727 MHz. The higher boost clock on the A1000 does not compensate for its far fewer execution resources.

Compute resources differ by large factors. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, alongside 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. The RTX A1000 has 2,304 shading units, 72 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores. Pixel and texture rates tell the same story: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile hits 115.8 GPixel/s and 266.2 GTexel/s, versus the RTX A1000’s 46.78 GPixel/s and 105.3 GTexel/s. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is a non-issue.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins every compute and graphics benchmark in the shared set. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 143,870 versus the RTX A1000’s 52,078, a 176.3% advantage. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 139,213 versus 49,574, a 180.8% lead. These are not marginal wins; they are dominant across-the-board victories. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also holds a higher average benchmark score (35,435 vs 34,207), and its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 (average 35,520, delta -0.2%), meaning it trades blows with a much older high-end workstation card. Its Passmark G3D score of 24,004 and GPU compute score of 10,101 further cement its position as a high-performance part.

The RTX A1000’s wins are not in raw performance but in physical attributes. Its 50 W TDP is 10 W lower than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 60 W TDP, and it is a single-slot card measuring 163 mm in length and 69 mm in height. It draws power from no external connectors and has a suggested PSU of 250 W, making it easy to slot into existing systems. It also offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, which is a fixed, professional I/O configuration. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, by contrast, is an IGP with no dedicated power connectors and display outputs that are "Portable Device Dependent," meaning it relies entirely on the host laptop’s design. For a compact, multi-display workstation, the RTX A1000 is the more practical choice, even if it loses on performance.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, with an average benchmark score of 35,435, versus 34,207 for the NVIDIA RTX A1000.

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile in Geekbench Vulkan?

A: It scores 139,213 compared to the RTX A1000’s 49,574, a delta of 180.8%.

Q: What are the memory configurations of each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth; the RTX A1000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 60 W TDP, while the RTX A1000 has a 50 W TDP.

Q: Which GPU has more RT cores?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 46 RT cores, compared to 18 on the RTX A1000.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data is unambiguous: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins both shared tests by a wide margin. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143,870 against the RTX A1000’s 52,078. The 176.3% delta means the newer card is nearly three times faster in this compute workload. This result aligns with the underlying hardware: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5,888 shading units and 17.04 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, versus 2,304 units and 6.737 TFLOPS for the RTX A1000. OpenCL workloads that scale with raw compute will see near-linear gains.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the lead grows slightly to 180.8%. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile posts 139,213, while the RTX A1000 manages 49,574. Vulkan benefits from the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s higher texture rate (266.2 GTexel/s vs 105.3 GTexel/s) and pixel rate (115.8 GPixel/s vs 46.78 GPixel/s), which directly impact graphics-heavy tasks. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s also helps feed its 184 TMUs, whereas the RTX A1000’s 192.0 GB/s bandwidth is a bottleneck for its 72 TMUs.

Beyond the shared tests, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s other benchmark scores reinforce its dominance. It achieves a Passmark G3D score of 24,004 and a GPU compute score of 10,101, while its Geekbench Vulkan result is 139,213. The RTX A1000 has no comparable Passmark scores in the data, but its Geekbench OpenCL (52,078) and Vulkan (49,574) results are consistent with its lower compute resources. In the overall percentile ranking, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits at the 80th percentile of all GPUs, and the RTX A1000 at the 79th — a narrow gap in percentile that belies the massive performance gulf in actual workloads. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro GV100, averages 35,520 (delta -0.2%), putting it in the same performance class as a former top-tier workstation card. The RTX A1000’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB, with an average of 34,154 (delta 0.2%), indicating it is a mid-range professional option. The data is clear: for any benchmark that stresses compute, graphics, or memory, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the superior part.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
RTX A1000
Core Specs
Shading Units
5,888
2,304 -60.9%
Shaders
5,888
2,304 -60.9%
TMUs
184
72 -60.9%
ROPs
80
32 -60.0%
SM Count
46
18 -60.9%
Clocks
Base Clock
847 MHz
727 MHz
Boost Clock
1447 MHz
1462 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
8,192 -33.3%
Memory Type
GDDR7
GDDR6
Memory Bus
192 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
672.0 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
48 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
115.8 GPixel/s
46.78 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
266.2 GTexel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
17.04 TFLOPS
6.737 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
266.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
105.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
17.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
6.737 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
46
18 -60.9%
Tensor Cores
184
72 -60.9%
Power
TDP
60 W
50 W
TDP (W)
60
50 -16.7%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
Ampere
GPU Name
GB205
GA107
Generation
GeForce 50 Mobile
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
31,100 million
8,700 million
Die Size
263 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
118.3M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
8.6
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 40 Mobile
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Details View RTX A1000 Details