NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a complete benchmark profile for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, but no recorded scores for the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. This asymmetry shapes the comparison: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has measurable results across nine tests, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has none. The recorded data for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile shows an average benchmark score of 35,435, which places it at the 80th percentile among all GPUs tracked. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero, indicating that no completed runs exist in the database at this time.

Focusing on the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s raw numbers, its strongest showing comes in Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 143,870, followed by Geekbench Vulkan at 139,213. PassMark’s G3D test yields 24,004, while GPU compute reaches 10,101. The DirectX legacy tests are far lower: DirectX 9 scores 259, DirectX 11 scores 237, DirectX 10 scores 151, and DirectX 12 scores 102. The G2D score of 981 reflects 2D rasterization performance. These figures indicate a GPU that excels in compute-heavy and modern graphics workloads but shows modest results in older DirectX API paths, a pattern consistent with an architecture optimized for current-generation features.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile provide context for its average score. The NVIDIA Quadro GV100 posts an average score of 35,520, which is 0.2% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 35,435. The AMD Radeon Pro Duo averages 35,860, putting it 1.2% ahead. The NVIDIA T1000 scores 36,289, leading by 2.4%. The NVIDIA A2 trails at 34,690, which is 2.1% behind the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. These deltas are tight, with all four rivals within a 4.5% band, suggesting that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile performs in a competitive mid-range tier despite its high percentile ranking. The lack of comparable benchmark data for the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation means no direct head-to-head score deltas can be computed, so any comparison rests on specification differences rather than measured performance.

FAQ

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s average benchmark score compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile averages 35,435. The NVIDIA Quadro GV100 is 0.2% higher at 35,520, the AMD Radeon Pro Duo is 1.2% higher at 35,860, and the NVIDIA T1000 is 2.4% higher at 36,289. The NVIDIA A2 is 2.1% lower at 34,690.

Q: What is the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation’s percentile ranking?

A: The database places it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero because no benchmark entries exist for this model.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5,888 shading units, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has 3,072.

Q: What are the memory configurations of the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has a TDP of 50 W.

Q: Which GPU has higher clock speeds?

A: The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has a base clock of 1530 MHz and a boost clock of 2010 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a base clock of 847 MHz and a boost clock of 1447 MHz.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0, using the GB205 chip, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace, using the AD107 chip. Both are fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, and their transistor densities are nearly identical: 118.3 million transistors per square millimeter for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile versus 118.9 million for the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. The die sizes differ substantially, with the GB205 measuring 263 mm² compared to the AD107’s 159 mm². Transistor counts follow the same trend: 31,100 million for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile versus 18,900 million for the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation.

Core counts scale with the larger die. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile packs 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. It also includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has 3,072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, with 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile therefore has roughly 1.9 times the shading units, TMUs, and tensor cores, and about 1.7 times the ROPs and ray tracing cores.

The memory subsystems reflect different design priorities. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses GDDR7 memory with an effective data rate of 28 Gbps, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation uses GDDR6 at 16 Gbps. Bus widths also differ: 192 bits for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile versus 128 bits for the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. These factors combine to produce a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s for the newer card and 256.0 GB/s for the older one, a 2.6-fold difference. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so their API feature sets are aligned.

The PCI Express interface differs as well. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This matters for bandwidth to the host system, though the practical impact depends on the platform. Both are integrated GPU (IGP) designs with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs, meaning they are intended for embedded or mobile implementations rather than desktop expansion cards.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every core specification. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a larger chip, more transistors, more shading units, more TMUs, more ROPs, more ray tracing cores, and more tensor cores. Its process node matches the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation at 5 nm, and its transistor density is marginally lower at 118.3M per mm² versus 118.9M per mm². The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile runs at lower clocks: 847 MHz base and 1447 MHz boost, compared to 1530 MHz base and 2010 MHz boost for the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. Despite lower clocks, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile achieves higher throughput due to its wider architecture: its pixel rate is 115.8 GPixel/s versus 96.48 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 266.2 GTexel/s versus 193.0 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance both reach 17.04 TFLOPS for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation delivers 12.35 TFLOPS for both.

Memory capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth all favor the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile: 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus versus 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The bandwidth gap is stark, 672.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s. TDP also differs, with the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile drawing 60 W versus 50 W for the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. The bus interface moves from PCIe 5.0 x16 to PCIe 4.0 x16. Both share the same slot width (IGP), power connectors (none), and display outputs (portable device dependent). Release dates separate the pair by nearly two years: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile launched on 2025-02-28, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation launched on 2023-03-20. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s predecessor is the GeForce 40 Mobile, and the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation’s predecessor is the Ampere-MW, with a successor listed as the Blackwell-MW. Both are marked as Active in production status.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins on every measurable performance dimension available in the database. Its FP32 throughput of 17.04 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation’s 12.35 TFLOPS by a margin that reflects the larger core count and higher memory bandwidth. Pixel and texture rates also favor the newer GPU, with 115.8 GPixel/s versus 96.48 GPixel/s and 266.2 GTexel/s versus 193.0 GTexel/s. Memory bandwidth is the largest single advantage: 672.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s, a difference that directly impacts texture-heavy workloads, high-resolution rendering, and compute tasks that stream large data sets.

The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation retains advantages in clock speed and power efficiency per clock. Its base clock of 1530 MHz and boost clock of 2010 MHz are considerably higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 847 MHz and 1447 MHz. This means that for lightly threaded or latency-sensitive tasks where clock frequency dominates, the older GPU could execute individual operations faster. Its lower TDP of 50 W also positions it for more constrained thermal envelopes, although the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 60 W TDP is still modest for a GPU with that much compute capability. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation’s smaller die size of 159 mm² and lower transistor count of 18,900 million may also appeal to designs where physical space and cost of the silicon substrate matter more than raw performance.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s GDDR7 memory at 28 Gbps effective and 12 GB capacity gives it a clear edge for modern workloads that require large frame buffers or high-bandwidth data movement, such as AI inference, ray-traced rendering, and high-refresh-rate gaming. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation’s 8 GB GDDR6 at 16 Gbps is sufficient for older titles, lighter compute, and embedded applications with fixed memory requirements. Neither GPU has a launch MSRP recorded, so no price-based comparison is possible.

The Verdict

The data points to a decisive performance hierarchy. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers roughly 38% higher FP32 throughput (17.04 TFLOPS versus 12.35 TFLOPS), nearly 2.6 times the memory bandwidth, and more than double the shading units, tensor cores, and ray tracing cores. Its average benchmark score of 35,435 places it at the 80th percentile, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation’s zero-score profile sits at the 50th percentile. For any workload that stresses parallel compute, memory throughput, or modern graphics features, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the stronger choice.

The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is not without purpose. Its higher clocks and lower TDP make it suitable for embedded systems where power draw is tightly capped and software is optimized for single-threaded or low-occupancy execution. Its 8 GB GDDR6 memory may suffice for fixed-function applications, and its PCIe 4.0 interface is adequate for many industrial or portable designs. However, no benchmark data exists in the database to quantify its real-world performance, so its advantages remain theoretical.

For users selecting a GPU purely on measured results, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the only option with verified scores, and those scores rank it among established mid-range performers. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation’s zero benchmark record means it cannot be validated against any rival, leaving its capabilities unproven. The verdict from the database is straightforward: choose the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile for performance, choose the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation only if its lower power draw and higher clocks align with a specific embedded requirement, acknowledging that its performance remains unmeasured.