NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains only a single benchmark result for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, and no benchmark entries for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This places it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, but this percentile is based on no recorded test data, so it reflects its database entry status rather than measured performance.

Comparing the RTX 5070 SUPER to its nearest rivals in the database, the margin is narrow. The NVIDIA Quadro K1100M averages 2664 points, which is 1% behind the RTX 5070 SUPER. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 averages 2662 points, a 1.1% deficit. The Intel Arc Pro B50 also averages 2660 points, another 1.1% gap. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 averages 2645 points, 1.7% lower. These deltas indicate that the RTX 5070 SUPER's recorded score places it in a cluster of lower-tier GPUs, despite its modern architecture and high-end specifications.

Because the head-to-head benchmark list is empty and the LX PRO has no scores, no direct comparison can be made from measured results. The RTX 5070 SUPER's single score of 2690 is the only quantitative performance data available. The LX PRO's 0 average score means it has not been subjected to any recorded benchmark run in the database. Any performance assessment between these two cards must rely on their specification sheets rather than empirical test results.

The RTX 5070 SUPER's 2690 points represent its sole data point, and the percentile ranking of 18 indicates that most other GPUs in the database score higher. The LX PRO's 50th percentile, despite the zero score, suggests its database entry is positioned differently, but without benchmark numbers this ranking carries no measured weight. The nearest rival deltas for the RTX 5070 SUPER, all under 2%, show that its recorded performance is tightly grouped with older and less capable cards.

FAQ

Q: What benchmark score does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER have?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER records a score of 2690 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which represents its average benchmark score and its only measured result.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any benchmark scores?

A: No. The LX PRO has an empty benchmarks list and an average benchmark score of 0, meaning no recorded test data exists for it in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER leads the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M by 1%, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 by 1.1%, the Intel Arc Pro B50 by 1.1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 by 1.7%, based on average scores of 2664, 2662, 2660, and 2645 respectively.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth with 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus. The LX PRO provides 432.0 GB/s with 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on the same 192-bit bus.

Q: What are the FP32 compute figures for each card?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER reaches 32.15 TFLOPS in FP32. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS in FP32, but its FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS due to a 2:1 ratio, compared to the RTX 5070 SUPER's 32.15 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: Do both cards use the same power connector?

A: Yes, both the RTX 5070 SUPER and the LX PRO use a single 16-pin power connector, and both are dual-slot designs.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is the only one of the two with measurable benchmark results. Its score of 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while modest relative to the broader database, provides a concrete performance reference. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded scores, so its performance cannot be verified from the database. Users requiring a card with documented benchmark performance should consider the RTX 5070 SUPER, as it has an active production status and a recorded result. The LX PRO, despite its larger memory capacity and higher percentile ranking, offers no measured data to support any performance claims.

The RTX 5070 SUPER also leads in several compute metrics. Its FP32 throughput of 32.15 TFLOPS exceeds the LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS. The texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s on the RTX 5070 SUPER outpaces the LX PRO's 384.0 GTexel/s. The pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s on the RTX 5070 SUPER is higher than the LX PRO's 192.0 GPixel/s. For rasterization-heavy workloads, the RTX 5070 SUPER delivers more raw throughput per clock cycle.

However, the LX PRO holds advantages in memory capacity and FP16 compute. Its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory exceeds the RTX 5070 SUPER's 18 GB of GDDR7, which may benefit workloads with large working sets. The LX PRO's FP16 figure of 49.15 TFLOPS, achieved through a 2:1 ratio, is substantially higher than the RTX 5070 SUPER's 32.15 TFLOPS FP16, suggesting an advantage for mixed-precision compute tasks. The LX PRO also has a higher pixel rate per ROP, with 96 ROPs versus 80 on the RTX 5070 SUPER, although its overall pixel rate is lower.

The RTX 5070 SUPER uses a 5 nm process from TSMC with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The LX PRO uses a 6 nm process from the same foundry, with transistor count and die size unknown. The power draw favors the LX PRO at 225 W versus 275 W for the RTX 5070 SUPER, and the LX PRO lists a suggested PSU of 550 W while the RTX 5070 SUPER has no suggested PSU value in the database. The RTX 5070 SUPER supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

For display output, the RTX 5070 SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RTX 5070 SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4, whereas the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses the GB205 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture, on a 6 nm process also at TSMC. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, while the LX PRO's transistor count and die size are unknown.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The RTX 5070 SUPER has a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock listed. Memory clocks also differ: the RTX 5070 SUPER runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective, while the LX PRO runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration differs in capacity and type. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The shading unit counts are close: 6400 for the RTX 5070 SUPER versus 6144 for the LX PRO. Texture mapping units are 200 versus 192. Raster output units favor the LX PRO at 96 versus 80. The RTX 5070 SUPER includes 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores, while the LX PRO lists no RT or tensor core counts.

Pixel and texture rates differ. The RTX 5070 SUPER achieves 201.0 GPixel/s and 502.4 GTexel/s. The LX PRO achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 32.15 TFLOPS on the RTX 5070 SUPER versus 24.58 TFLOPS on the LX PRO. FP16 compute is 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1) on the RTX 5070 SUPER versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) on the LX PRO.

Power and physical dimensions vary. The RTX 5070 SUPER has a TDP of 275 W, while the LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W. The RTX 5070 SUPER measures 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Both use a dual-slot design and a single 16-pin power connector. The LX PRO specifies a 550 W suggested PSU, while the RTX 5070 SUPER has none listed.

Bus interface and display outputs differ. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. API support differs in Vulkan version: 1.4 for the RTX 5070 SUPER versus 1.3 for the LX PRO. Release dates differ as well, with the RTX 5070 SUPER released on 2025-12-31 and the LX PRO on 2026-03-16.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5070 SUPER is built on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB205 chip. The LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G105 chip. These represent fundamentally different design approaches. Blackwell 2.0 is a continuation of NVIDIA's GeForce 50-series line, incorporating dedicated ray tracing cores and tensor cores. The RTX 5070 SUPER includes 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, reflecting a design focused on hybrid rendering and AI acceleration. The LX PRO lists no RT or tensor core counts, suggesting its TrueGPU architecture may not include specialized hardware for these workloads.

The process nodes differ by one nanometer. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses a 5 nm process from TSMC, while the LX PRO uses a 6 nm process from the same foundry. The RTX 5070 SUPER packs 31,100 million transistors into a 263 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.3 million per square millimeter. The LX PRO's transistor count and die size are unknown, so its density cannot be calculated.

Memory technology differs between generations. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses GDDR7, the newer standard, with 28 Gbps effective speed. The LX PRO uses GDDR6, an earlier generation, with 18 Gbps effective speed. Despite the LX PRO having 6 GB more capacity, its bandwidth is 240 GB/s lower due to the slower memory speed. The RTX 5070 SUPER's memory clock of 1750 MHz is lower than the LX PRO's 2250 MHz, but the GDDR7 standard compensates with higher data rates per pin.

The RTX 5070 SUPER's FP16 compute matches its FP32 at a 1:1 ratio, indicating no dedicated FP16 acceleration path. The LX PRO's FP16 is double its FP32 at a 2:1 ratio, showing a design where FP16 operations execute at twice the rate of FP32, common in GPU architectures that pair FP32 units for reduced-precision work. This gives the LX PRO a substantial FP16 advantage at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 32.15 TFLOPS.

The shading and texture configurations are similar in scale but not identical. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units and 200 TMUs, while the LX PRO has 6144 shading units and 192 TMUs. The RTX 5070 SUPER's higher TMU count contributes to its 502.4 GTexel/s texture rate, compared to 384.0 GTexel/s on the LX PRO. The LX PRO's higher ROP count of 96 versus 80 does not translate to a higher pixel rate, as the RTX 5070 SUPER achieves 201.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate with the 12_2 feature level and OpenGL 4.6. The Vulkan API support differs, with the RTX 5070 SUPER at version 1.4 and the LX PRO at version 1.3. The RTX 5070 SUPER's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface offers double the bandwidth of the LX PRO's PCIe 4.0 x16, which can affect data transfer rates for large datasets or when system memory is involved. The LX PRO's 225 W TDP is 50 W lower than the RTX 5070 SUPER's 275 W, and it is the only one with a suggested PSU rating in the database.