NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER represent two vastly different eras of GPU design, separated by nearly a decade of architectural evolution. The Quadro P1000 is a legacy professional workstation card built on the 14nm Pascal architecture, while the RTX 5070 SUPER is a current-generation Blackwell 2.0 consumer GPU. The data shows that these cards share almost nothing in common except their manufacturer and the OpenGL 4.6 API support. The Quadro P1000 sits in the 20th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 SUPER occupies the 18th percentile, though this ranking is based on entirely different benchmark suites, making direct performance comparison challenging.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Quadro P1000 has a significantly higher average benchmark score of 3163 compared to the RTX 5070 SUPER’s 2690. However, these averages are derived from different test suites: the Quadro P1000 was tested across nine benchmarks including Geekbench OpenCL and multiple Passmark tests, while the RTX 5070 SUPER was evaluated only in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: How does the memory configuration differ between the two cards?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER offers 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the Quadro P1000 provides 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus with 80.19 GB/s bandwidth. This represents a 4.5x increase in memory capacity and an 8.4x increase in bandwidth for the newer card.

Q: What is the transistor density difference between the two architectures?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER, built on TSMC’s 5nm process, achieves a transistor density of 118.3M per mm² with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The Quadro P1000, fabricated on Samsung’s 14nm process, has a density of 25.0M per mm² with 3,300 million transistors on a 132 mm² die — a 4.7x density advantage for Blackwell 2.0.

Q: Do both cards support the same API levels?

A: Both cards support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, but they differ in DirectX support. The Quadro P1000 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the RTX 5070 SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes additional features like ray tracing and mesh shaders.

Q: Which card has more shading units and texture mapping units?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units and 200 TMUs, compared to the Quadro P1000’s 640 shading units and 40 TMUs. This gives the newer card exactly 10x the shading units and 5x the texture mapping units.

Q: What are the physical size differences between the two cards?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requiring a 16-pin power connector. The Quadro P1000 is a single-slot card at 150 mm long and 69 mm high, requiring no power connectors.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two NVIDIA GPUs is generational. The Quadro P1000 uses the Pascal architecture (GP107 chip) fabricated on Samsung’s 14nm process, while the RTX 5070 SUPER employs Blackwell 2.0 (GB205 chip) on TSMC’s 5nm process. This node transition delivers a massive density improvement: the newer chip packs 31,100 million transistors into 263 mm² versus 3,300 million transistors in 132 mm² for the older part.

The compute capabilities diverge sharply. The RTX 5070 SUPER features 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores — hardware completely absent from the Quadro P1000, which has no RT or tensor core counts listed. This enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI processing on the newer card. The FP32 throughput tells the story: the RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS versus the Quadro P1000’s 1.894 TFLOPS, a 17x difference. FP16 performance is even more stark: the Blackwell card achieves 32.15 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, while the Pascal card manages only 29.60 GFLOPS at a 1:64 ratio, meaning it has essentially negligible half-precision capability.

Memory architecture reflects the same generational leap. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses GDDR7 at 28 Gbps effective with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Quadro P1000 relies on GDDR5 at 5 Gbps effective with 80.19 GB/s. The newer card’s 18 GB capacity dwarfs the older card’s 4 GB. Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern: 201.0 GPixel/s and 502.4 GTexel/s for the RTX card versus 47.36 GPixel/s and 59.20 GTexel/s for the Quadro.

The RTX 5070 SUPER also brings modern connectivity: PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and display outputs including HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connectors. The Quadro P1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 and offers four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The power envelope has grown accordingly, from a 47W TDP with no power connectors to a 275W TDP requiring a 16-pin connector.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are impossible because the two cards were tested on entirely different suites, with zero overlapping tests in the data. The Quadro P1000 was evaluated across nine benchmarks, achieving its highest score in Geekbench OpenCL at 13584 and its lowest in Passmark DirectX 12 at 19. Its Passmark G3D score of 4512 and G2D score of 589 indicate modest legacy performance.

The RTX 5070 SUPER has only one benchmark result: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690. This single data point does not allow for meaningful cross-card comparison, as 3DMark Steel Nomad is a modern DirectX 12 test that the Quadro P1000’s older architecture could not run at comparable settings. The Quadro’s DirectX 12 score of 19 in Passmark is from a different testing methodology entirely.

The nearest rival data provides context for each card separately. The Quadro P1000’s average score of 3163 places it near the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182, -0.6% delta) and slightly above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER (3075, +2.9% delta). It trails the NVIDIA GeForce 920M (3287, -3.8% delta). The RTX 5070 SUPER’s average of 2690 sits just above the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664, +1% delta) and slightly ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2662, +1.1% delta).

These rival comparisons are instructive. The Quadro P1000, despite being end-of-life since 2017, still outperforms a current-generation RTX 5080 SUPER in average benchmark score according to the data. Meanwhile, the RTX 5070 SUPER’s single benchmark places it in proximity to older entry-level cards, though this likely reflects the limited testing rather than true performance equivalence. The percentile rankings — 20th for the Quadro and 18th for the RTX card — suggest both occupy similar low-tier positions when measured against all GPUs, but the different benchmark methodologies prevent definitive conclusions about relative performance.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification category. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses the GB205 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, while the Quadro P1000 uses GP107 with Pascal. Process nodes are 5nm (TSMC) versus 14nm (Samsung). Transistor counts are 31,100 million versus 3,300 million, with die sizes of 263 mm² versus 132 mm².

Memory specifications show the RTX card with 18 GB GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus delivering 672.0 GB/s, against the Quadro’s 4 GB GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus at 80.19 GB/s. Clock speeds differ substantially: the RTX 5070 SUPER has base and boost clocks of 2325 MHz and 2512 MHz respectively, while the Quadro P1000 runs at 1266 MHz base and 1480 MHz boost. Memory clocks are 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) versus 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective).

Compute resources are dramatically different: 6400 shading units versus 640, 200 TMUs versus 40, and 80 ROPs versus 32. The RTX card adds 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, which the Quadro lacks entirely. Pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s versus 47.36 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s versus 59.20 GTexel/s. FP32 is 32.15 TFLOPS versus 1.894 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 29.60 GFLOPS (1:64).

Physical and power characteristics differ as well: the RTX 5070 SUPER is dual-slot with a 275W TDP and 16-pin connector, while the Quadro P1000 is single-slot with 47W TDP and no power connector. The RTX card measures 245 mm by 115 mm by 40 mm, versus 150 mm by 69 mm for the Quadro. Bus interfaces are PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs are HDMI 2.1b with three DisplayPort 2.1b versus four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. Production status is Active versus End-of-life, with release dates of 2025-12-31 versus 2017-02-06. The Quadro has a predecessor (Quadro Maxwell) and successor (Quadro Volta), while the RTX card lists neither.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear choice for different use cases. Professional users working with legacy workstation applications that rely on the Quadro P1000’s certified driver ecosystem and its 150 mm single-slot form factor will find value in its 47W TDP and four mini-DisplayPort outputs. Its average benchmark score of 3163, which beats the RTX 5080 SUPER in the nearest rival data, suggests it remains competitive in certain legacy workloads despite being end-of-life.

For users needing modern GPU capabilities, the RTX 5070 SUPER is the obvious selection. Its 18 GB GDDR7 memory with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, 50 RT cores, and 200 tensor cores enable ray tracing and AI workloads that the Quadro P1000 cannot handle at all. The 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 17x advantage over the Pascal card’s 1.894 TFLOPS make it suitable for demanding compute tasks. The newer card’s PCIe 5.0 interface and modern display outputs (HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b) provide future-proofing that the PCIe 3.0, mini-DisplayPort-only Quadro lacks.

The RTX 5070 SUPER’s 275W TDP and dual-slot design require more robust cooling and power delivery, whereas the Quadro P1000’s 47W TDP and single-slot profile fit into compact and low-power systems. The Quadro’s no-power-connector design makes it ideal for upgrade-constrained environments.

The benchmark data does not allow direct performance comparison, as the two cards share no common tests. However, the architectural differences are so stark that the RTX 5070 SUPER is clearly the more capable card for modern workloads. The Quadro P1000 retains relevance only for specific legacy professional applications where its certified drivers and low power draw are priorities. Users requiring ray tracing, tensor operations, or high-bandwidth memory should choose the RTX 5070 SUPER. Users with existing Quadro-dependent workflows and minimal power budgets may stick with the P1000, though its end-of-life status limits future support.