NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty for both items, meaning no shared test scores have been recorded that would allow a direct comparison of their performance in identical workloads. The RTX 5060 has ten individual benchmark entries, while the RTX PRO 4500 has none, which limits any quantitative side-by-side analysis to the specifications and the RTX 5060's own recorded scores.
The RTX 5060's recorded scores show a spread across different DirectX levels: PassMark DirectX 9 returns 225, DirectX 10 returns 127, DirectX 11 returns 200, and DirectX 12 returns 77. The PassMark G3D score is 20891, while the GPU compute score is 10899. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 5060 scores 3628. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 112787 and 113321 respectively. The average benchmark score for the RTX 5060 is 26331, placing it in the 72nd percentile against all GPUs in the database. With no corresponding scores for the RTX PRO 4500, the percentile and average figures remain the only benchmark-derived data points available, and they cannot be used to infer a lead or deficit for either card.
Because the RTX PRO 4500 has no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals listed, the database offers no basis for comparing its measured performance to the RTX 5060 or any other card. The RTX 5060's nearest rivals, all with average scores close to its own, further illustrate the absence of a comparable dataset for the server card. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401, a delta of -0.3 percent relative to the RTX 5060, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421, also -0.3 percent, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, a delta of -0.8 percent, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, a delta of 1.2 percent. These deltas show the RTX 5060 sits within a tight band of roughly one percent of these rivals, but they say nothing about the RTX PRO 4500.
Where Each One Wins
Without head-to-head benchmark results, wins must be assessed from the recorded specifications. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server holds a clear advantage in raw compute resources. It uses 10496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operations pipelines, compared to the RTX 5060's 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operations pipelines. The server card also has 82 ray tracing cores and 328 tensor cores, while the RTX 5060 has 30 ray tracing cores and 120 tensor cores. These numbers indicate the RTX PRO 4500 delivers substantially higher peak throughput: its FP32 rating is 50.70 TFLOPS, and its texture rate is 792.1 GTexel/s, versus 19.18 TFLOPS and 299.6 GTexel/s for the RTX 5060. The pixel rate difference is also large, with the RTX PRO 4500 at 270.5 GPixel/s compared to 119.9 GPixel/s for the RTX 5060.
Memory capacity and bandwidth favor the RTX PRO 4500 as well. It has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 800.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5060 has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s. The server card's memory clock is 1563 MHz, which translates to 25 Gbps effective, while the RTX 5060 runs at 1750 MHz, or 28 Gbps effective. The RTX PRO 4500 also uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, whereas the RTX 5060 uses PCIe 5.0 x8, doubling the available bus bandwidth for the server part.
The RTX 5060 wins in clock speeds and power efficiency. Its base clock is 2280 MHz and boost clock is 2497 MHz, both higher than the RTX PRO 4500's 1215 MHz base and 2415 MHz boost. The RTX 5060 draws 145 W, compared to 165 W for the RTX PRO 4500, and it requires a 300 W suggested power supply versus 450 W for the server card. The RTX 5060 also has a smaller die at 181 mm² with 21,900 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 121.0M per mm², which is nearly identical to the RTX PRO 4500's 120.6M per mm² from a 378 mm² die with 45,600 million transistors. Both are built on TSMC's 5 nm process.
The RTX 5060 has display outputs, specifically 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the RTX PRO 4500 has no outputs, reflecting its server orientation. The RTX 5060 is dual-slot with a 1x 8-pin power connector, while the RTX PRO 4500 is single-slot with a 1x 16-pin connector. Physical dimensions differ slightly: the RTX 5060 is 241 mm long, 111 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, while the RTX PRO 4500 is 267 mm long with the same 111 mm height and 40 mm width.
The Verdict
The data indicates two distinctly positioned products. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is a client-focused card with a launch MSRP of 299 USD, active production status, and a release date of 2025-05-18. Its benchmark scores are recorded, and its 72nd percentile placement against all GPUs shows it performs in the upper mid-range of the database. The nearest rival deltas, all within 1.2 percent, confirm it sits in a competitive cluster where small score differences separate cards. The RTX 5060's higher clocks and lower power draw make it suitable for scenarios where per-watt performance and compact dimensions matter, though its 8 GB memory and x8 bus limit large data workloads.
The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server has no recorded benchmarks, no nearest rivals, and no launch MSRP, so the database provides no measured performance validation for it. Its specifications, however, show a card designed for compute-heavy server tasks: 32 GB of memory, 50.70 TFLOPS FP32, and a single-slot form factor with a 16-pin connector. The absence of display outputs confirms it is not intended for direct video output. The RTX PRO 4500's release date of 2026-03-16 places it later in the product cycle, and its predecessor is Server Hopper, with Server Rubin as the successor, while the RTX 5060's predecessor is GeForce 40 and successor is GeForce 60.
For a user selecting between these two based solely on database records, the choice depends on available data: the RTX 5060 has verified benchmark results and a clear performance percentile, while the RTX PRO 4500 offers superior raw specifications but no measured scores. The RTX 5060 is the only one with a quantifiable performance profile. The RTX PRO 4500's larger memory and compute resources suggest it targets workloads that the RTX 5060 cannot handle, but without benchmark entries, the database cannot confirm how that translates into real-world results. The verdict from the recorded data is that the RTX 5060 is a measured, mid-range performer, while the RTX PRO 4500 remains an unmeasured high-spec server part.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060?
A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331, placing it in the 72nd percentile against all GPUs in the database.
Q: Does the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server have any recorded benchmark scores?
A: No, the RTX PRO 4500 has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed in the database.
Q: How does the memory configuration differ between the two cards?
A: The RTX 5060 has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the RTX PRO 4500 has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 800.3 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: What are the FP32 compute ratings for each card?
A: The RTX 5060 delivers 19.18 TFLOPS FP32, while the RTX PRO 4500 delivers 50.70 TFLOPS FP32, a difference of more than 2.6 times in favor of the server card.
Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?
A: The RTX 5060 has a boost clock of 2497 MHz, which is higher than the RTX PRO 4500's 2415 MHz boost clock.
Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?
A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, according to the database.
Architecture Differences
The two cards share the same Blackwell 2.0 architecture and are both fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process, but they use different chips and have significantly different internal configurations. The RTX 5060 uses the GB206 chip, while the RTX PRO 4500 uses the GB203 chip. The transistor counts differ substantially: the RTX 5060 has 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, and the RTX PRO 4500 has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. Transistor densities are nearly equal, at 121.0M per mm² for the RTX 5060 and 120.6M per mm² for the RTX PRO 4500, indicating the larger chip scales the same design density to a bigger area.
The core counts reflect this scaling. The RTX PRO 4500 has 10496 shading units, 328 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, compared to the RTX 5060's 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. Ray tracing cores number 82 on the server card versus 30 on the client card, and tensor cores number 328 versus 120. Both cards support FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning their FP16 TFLOPS figures match their FP32 ratings: 19.18 TFLOPS for the RTX 5060 and 50.70 TFLOPS for the RTX PRO 4500.
Clock behavior diverges. The RTX 5060 runs at a base clock of 2280 MHz and boosts to 2497 MHz, while the RTX PRO 4500 has a much lower base clock of 1215 MHz but boosts to 2415 MHz. The server card's memory operates at 1563 MHz, or 25 Gbps effective, while the RTX 5060's memory runs at 1750 MHz, or 28 Gbps effective. Despite the lower memory clock, the RTX PRO 4500 achieves higher bandwidth due to its wider 256-bit bus.
The power and physical designs also differ. The RTX 5060 has a TDP of 145 W, a dual-slot form factor, and a 1x 8-pin power connector, with a suggested power supply of 300 W. The RTX PRO 4500 has a TDP of 165 W, a single-slot form factor, and a 1x 16-pin power connector, with a suggested power supply of 450 W. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x8 for the RTX 5060 and PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX PRO 4500. Display outputs are present on the RTX 5060 (1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b) but absent on the RTX PRO 4500. The generation field lists the RTX 5060 as GeForce 50 and the RTX PRO 4500 as Server Blackwell (Bxx), with the latter's predecessor and successor being Server Hopper and Server Rubin, respectively, versus GeForce 40 and GeForce 60 for the former.