NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Comparison

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 share the same Blackwell 2.0 architecture and 5 nm TSMC process, but they are engineered for different missions. The data shows a decisive performance gap: the RTX PRO 4000 wins all nine head-to-head benchmark comparisons, with an average benchmark score of 27135 against 26331 for the RTX 5060. Both cards sit at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, yet the RTX PRO 4000 delivers substantially higher absolute performance across every tested workload.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided result comes in Geekbench Vulkan, where the RTX PRO 4000 scores 194168 against the RTX 5060's 113321 — a 71.3% advantage. This is the single largest delta in the comparison and highlights the PRO card's dominance in compute-oriented API workloads. The legacy DirectX 9 test shows a similar pattern: 354 versus 225, a 57.3% lead for the RTX PRO 4000. These aren't marginal wins; they represent fundamentally different performance tiers.

In modern DirectX 12 workloads, the gap narrows but remains substantial. The RTX PRO 4000 posts 97 in Passmark DirectX 12 versus 77 for the RTX 5060, a 26% edge. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test tells a similar story: 4648 versus 3628, with the PRO card leading by 28.1%. The RTX PRO 4000 also wins Passmark DirectX 11 by 38% (276 vs 200) and DirectX 10 by 36.2% (173 vs 127).

The largest absolute score difference appears in Passmark G3D, where the RTX PRO 4000 reaches 28427 compared to 20891 — a 36.1% improvement. Compute performance follows the same trajectory: Passmark GPU Compute shows 14805 versus 10899, a 35.8% lead. Even the 2D test, typically less dependent on raw GPU horsepower, favors the RTX PRO 4000 at 1265 versus 1154, a 9.6% edge. In every single benchmark, the RTX PRO 4000 wins; the RTX 5060 does not claim a single victory across the nine tested workloads.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on benchmark outcomes, the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell wins everywhere. There is no workload category in the data where the RTX 5060 outperforms it. The PRO card's advantages are most pronounced in Vulkan compute (71.3% lead), legacy DirectX 9 (57.3%), and DirectX 11 (38%). These results suggest the RTX PRO 4000 is the stronger choice for applications that rely on compute-heavy rendering paths, older API compatibility, or general 3D acceleration.

The RTX 5060's closest relative performance comes in the 2D test, where it trails by only 9.6%. Its DirectX 12 deficit of 26% is also its best modern-API showing. This indicates the RTX 5060 is less disadvantaged in newer, more optimized rendering pipelines, but it still loses decisively. For users prioritizing raw frame rates in current DirectX 12 titles, the RTX 5060 offers the smaller gap — but the RTX PRO 4000 remains ahead.

The RTX 5060's launch MSRP is 299 USD, which is noted once here. The RTX PRO 4000 has no launch MSRP listed. However, the performance data does not support any scenario where the RTX 5060 wins on measured benchmarks. The RTX PRO 4000's wins span 2D, 3D, compute, and multiple DirectX versions, making it the universal choice in this comparison.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs use the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on TSMC's 5 nm node, but they are built around different chips. The RTX PRO 4000 uses the GB203 die, measuring 378 mm² with 45,600 million transistors at a density of 120.6M per mm². The RTX 5060 uses the GB206 chip, which is 181 mm² with 21,900 million transistors at 121.0M per mm². The transistor densities are nearly identical, but the GB203 has more than twice the die area and transistor count.

The RTX PRO 4000 features 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, alongside 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. The RTX 5060 has 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, with 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores. This means the PRO card has 2.33 times the shading units, 2.33 times the TMUs, and 2 times the ROPs. Its FP32 compute reaches 36.83 TFLOPS, nearly double the RTX 5060's 19.18 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is identical to FP32 on both cards at a 1:1 ratio.

Memory configurations diverge significantly. The RTX PRO 4000 carries 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5060 has 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 448.0 GB/s. Both run memory at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. The PRO card's 24 GB capacity is three times larger, and its bandwidth is 50% higher. Clock speeds favor the RTX 5060, which boosts to 2497 MHz versus 2055 MHz for the PRO card, but the PRO's wider architecture overcomes this frequency disadvantage.

Pixel and texture rates reinforce the gap: the RTX PRO 4000 outputs 197.3 GPixel/s and 575.4 GTexel/s, while the RTX 5060 manages 119.9 GPixel/s and 299.6 GTexel/s. Power draw is similar — 140 W versus 145 W — but the RTX PRO 4000 fits in a single slot with a 16-pin connector, while the RTX 5060 is dual-slot with an 8-pin connector. Both have identical API support: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins more benchmarks?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell wins all nine head-to-head benchmarks, with zero wins for the RTX 5060.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX PRO 4000 leads by 71.3%, scoring 194168 versus 113321 for the RTX 5060.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The RTX PRO 4000 has 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, while the RTX 5060 has 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Are they built on the same architecture?

A: Yes, both use Blackwell 2.0 architecture on TSMC's 5 nm process, but the RTX PRO 4000 uses the GB203 chip and the RTX 5060 uses the GB206 chip.

Q: What is the RTX 5060's average benchmark score compared to the RTX PRO 4000?

A: The RTX PRO 4000 averages 27135 across benchmarks, while the RTX 5060 averages 26331.

Q: Does the RTX 5060 have any advantage in clock speed?

A: The RTX 5060 boosts to 2497 MHz, higher than the RTX PRO 4000's 2055 MHz, but this does not translate into any benchmark wins.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell outperforms the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in every measured benchmark. Its average benchmark score of 27135 exceeds the RTX 5060's 26331, and it holds a 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs — matching the RTX 5060's percentile despite the PRO card's higher absolute scores. The PRO card's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (delta -1.6%) and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (delta -1.1%), placing it in established high-end territory. The RTX 5060, by contrast, sits closest to the AMD Radeon 860M (delta -0.3%) and NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (delta -0.3%), a markedly lower competitive tier.

For users who need maximum compute throughput, 24 GB of memory, and a single-slot form factor, the RTX PRO 4000 is the clear choice. Its 36.83 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 70 RT cores provide a substantial foundation for demanding workloads. The 140 W power draw and single-slot design make it suitable for dense workstation builds. The RTX 5060, with its 8 GB memory and 19.18 TFLOPS, targets a different segment — one where the data shows it simply cannot match the PRO card's output. Those prioritizing the RTX 5060's lower base clock sacrifice significant performance, as the RTX 5060 loses by double digits in eight of nine tests. The verdict is straightforward: the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the superior performer in this comparison, and the benchmark results offer no scenario where the RTX 5060 prevails.