GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 780M

CORE STATE Phoenix

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2700 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5060

CORE STATE GB206

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2497 MHz

TDP 145 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

480

N/A

geekbench_opencl

25,770

120,785

geekbench_vulkan

30,921

116,626

passmark_directx_10

N/A

127

passmark_directx_11

N/A

200

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

225

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,154

passmark_g3d

N/A

20,891

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

10,899

Analysis: AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

When analyzing RTX 5060 by NVIDIA to Radeon AMD Radeon 780M, the benchmark delta becomes obviously evident. RTX 5060 by NVIDIA takes the lead in nearly all benchmark we conducted. The difference is notable enough to impact real-world visual results. Enthusiasts can experience better visuals. The verdict is evident.

When it comes to RT, RTX 5060 by NVIDIA leaps considerably beyond of Radeon AMD Radeon 780M. The hardware cores process heavy reflection computations significantly more capably. Enthusiasts looking for modern visuals might certainly favor RTX 5060 by NVIDIA. The RT superiority is notable. Next-gen titles more and more take advantage of real-time ray tracing effects.

Overall, RTX 5060 by NVIDIA represents the more capable option in this evaluation. Its performance superiority support evaluation for users building a capable graphics PC. While Radeon AMD Radeon 780M possesses its merits, the benchmark results definitely supports RTX 5060 by NVIDIA. Base your conclusion accordingly. This gaming gap is significant sufficiently to impact.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

780M

RTX 5060

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

3,840 +400.0%

Shaders

768

3,840 +400.0%

TMUs

120 +150.0%

ROPs

48 +50.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

800 MHz

2280 MHz

Boost Clock

2700 MHz

2497 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

8 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

8,192

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR7

Memory Bus

System Shared

128 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

448.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

32 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

86.40 GPixel/s

119.9 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

129.6 GTexel/s

299.6 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

8.294 TFLOPS

19.18 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

518.4 GFLOPS (1:16)

299.6 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

16.59 TFLOPS (2:1)

19.18 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

30 +150.0%

Tensor Cores

—

120

Power

TDP

15 W

145 W

TDP (W)

145 +866.7%

Suggested PSU

—

300 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 8-pin

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Blackwell 2.0

GPU Name

Phoenix

GB206

Generation

Navi III IGP (Phoenix Mobile)

GeForce 50

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

25,390 million

21,900 million

Die Size

178 mm²

181 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

142.6M / mm²

121.0M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

CUDA

—

12.0

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

241 mm 9.5 inches

Height

—

111 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 5.0 x8

Other

Launch Price

—

299 USD

Production

Active

Predecessor

Navi II IGP

GeForce 40

Successor

Navi III IGP

—

View Radeon 780M Details View GeForce RTX 5060 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 780M

GeForce RTX 5060

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons