GPU Comparison

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

CORE STATE AD102

VRAM 24 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2520 MHz

TDP 425 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A2000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1687 MHz

TDP 95 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

8,587

N/A

geekbench_opencl

278,621

56,518

geekbench_vulkan

246,941

53,146

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

115

passmark_g2d

N/A

491

passmark_g3d

N/A

9,611

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

4,334

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Visual performance comparisons between Radeon RTX 4090 and NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile from NVIDIA reveal a clear leader. Radeon RTX 4090 offers notably better benchmark scores over contemporary AAA releases. The video memory superiority and technical improvements lead into visibly improved gameplay performance. Score figures demonstrates this finding. Users seeking top-tier visuals will consider this.

When it comes to ray tracing, Radeon RTX 4090 pulls further beyond of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile from NVIDIA. The hardware accelerators process intensive shadow effects far more efficiently. Players demanding cutting-edge fidelity would definitely consider Radeon RTX 4090. The real-time ray tracing performance is notable. Modern games more and more leverage RT effects.

Overall, Radeon RTX 4090 offers the superior option in this evaluation. Its benchmark edges warrant attention for buyers putting together a demanding gaming rig. Although NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile from NVIDIA features its strengths, the test data obviously favors Radeon RTX 4090. Reach your conclusion with this in mind. The performance delta is notable enough to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RTX 4090 D

RTX A2000 Mobile

Core Specs

Shading Units

14,592

2,560 -82.5%

Shaders

14,592

2,560 -82.5%

TMUs

456

80 -82.5%

ROPs

176

48 -72.7%

SM Count

114

20 -82.5%

Clocks

Base Clock

2280 MHz

1215 MHz

Boost Clock

2520 MHz

1687 MHz

Memory Clock

1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

24 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

24,576

4,096 -83.3%

Memory Type

GDDR6X

GDDR6

Memory Bus

384 bit

128 bit

Bandwidth

1.01 TB/s

192.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

72 MB

2 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

443.5 GPixel/s

80.98 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

1,149.1 GTexel/s

135.0 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

73.54 TFLOPS

8.637 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1,149.1 GFLOPS (1:64)

135.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

73.54 TFLOPS (1:1)

8.637 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

114

20 -82.5%

Tensor Cores

456

80 -82.5%

Power

TDP

425 W

95 W

TDP (W)

425

95 -77.6%

Suggested PSU

800 W

—

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

None

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

Ampere

GPU Name

AD102

GA107

Generation

GeForce 40

Ampere-MW (Ax000)

Process Size

5 nm

8 nm

Transistors

76,300 million

8,700 million

Die Size

609 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

125.3M / mm²

43.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

8.9

8.6

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Triple-slot

IGP

Length

304 mm 12 inches

—

Height

137 mm 5.4 inches

—

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Portable Device Dependent

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

1,599 USD

—

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

GeForce 30

Quadro Turing-M

Successor

GeForce 50

Ada-MW

View GeForce RTX 4090 D Details View RTX A2000 Mobile Details

GPU Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

RTX A2000 Mobile

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons