NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER compare to the Lisuan Tech LX PRO in average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54,209, placing it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmarks, an average score of 0, and sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the RTX 4080 SUPER, and how much faster or slower are they?

A: The closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 with an average score of 54,247, which is 0.1% ahead of the 4080 SUPER. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828 (1.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698 (2.7% ahead), and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55,757 (2.8% ahead). The RTX 4080 SUPER trails all four rivals by a narrow margin.

Q: Which GPU has more memory and what type?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 736.3 GB/s.

Q: What are the process nodes for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER uses a 5 nm process at TSMC with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are unknown.

Q: Does the LX PRO support ray tracing or tensor cores?

A: The database lists no RT core count and no tensor core count for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The RTX 4080 SUPER has 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores.

Q: Which GPU is larger in physical size?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER is 310 mm long, 140 mm tall, and 61 mm wide, and takes a triple-slot configuration. The LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide, with a dual-slot configuration.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design lineages. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD103 chip, a 5 nm TSMC design with 45,900 million transistors packed into a 379 mm² die. That works out to a transistor density of 121.1 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G105 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process, but the transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The shading resources differ sharply. The RTX 4080 SUPER carries 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. In raw compute, the RTX 4080 SUPER delivers 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 and the same 52.22 TFLOPS of FP16 in a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 in a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 throughput is nearly double its FP32 throughput. That ratio indicates the LX PRO is tuned for workloads where half-precision math is acceptable, while the RTX 4080 SUPER treats both precisions equally.

Ray tracing and AI acceleration are areas where the LX PRO has no recorded data. The RTX 4080 SUPER has 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores. The LX PRO lists neither RT core nor tensor core counts, which suggests its feature set does not include dedicated hardware for those tasks, or the data was not captured.

The memory subsystems take different approaches. The RTX 4080 SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR6X across a 256-bit bus, reaching 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 across a 192-bit bus, reaching 432.0 GB/s. The larger capacity on the LX PRO is offset by a much narrower bus and slower memory type. The effective memory clock differs as well: 23 Gbps on the RTX 4080 SUPER versus 18 Gbps on the LX PRO.

API support is similar but not identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4080 SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs also differ: the RTX 4080 SUPER has one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the LX PRO has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and no HDMI.

The power and physical profiles diverge. The RTX 4080 SUPER has a 320 W TDP, requires a 700 W suggested PSU, uses a single 16-pin connector, and occupies a triple-slot width. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, requires a 550 W suggested PSU, uses the same single 16-pin connector, and fits in a dual-slot width. The RTX 4080 SUPER is longer (310 mm versus 248 mm), taller (140 mm versus 118 mm), and wider (61 mm versus 48 mm).

The Verdict

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison. The RTX 4080 SUPER has a full set of benchmark results and a clear competitive position. The LX PRO has no benchmarks, no nearest rivals, and an average score of zero. The database cannot confirm any performance relationship between the two cards because no head-to-head benchmarks exist.

What the data does show is that the RTX 4080 SUPER is a mature, measured product. It sits in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 54,209. Its closest rival, the RTX 4080, is only 0.1% faster, making the 4080 SUPER effectively a statistical tie with its predecessor. The other three rivals are 1.1% to 2.8% ahead, a margin small enough to be within run-to-run variance.

The LX PRO, by contrast, is an active product with a 2026 release date, a 6 nm process, and a 24 GB memory configuration, but its compute performance is untested. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is less than half of the RTX 4080 SUPER's 52.22 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is lower than 285.6 GPixel/s. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is also well below 816.0 GTexel/s.

For users who need a GPU with verified performance, the RTX 4080 SUPER is the only option with data. It offers higher raw throughput, more texture and pixel processing, faster memory bandwidth, and dedicated RT and tensor cores. For users who need 24 GB of memory and a lower power draw, the LX PRO provides that capacity and a 225 W TDP, but there is no recorded evidence of how it performs in actual workloads. The verdict from the database is clear: the RTX 4080 SUPER is a known quantity, while the LX PRO remains an unknown.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two GPUs:

• Chip: AD103 versus 7G105
• Architecture: Ada Lovelace versus TrueGPU
• Generation: GeForce 40 versus 7G100
• Process node: 5 nm versus 6 nm
• Transistors: 45,900 million versus unknown
• Die size: 379 mm² versus unknown
• Transistor density: 121.1M / mm² versus not recorded
• Base clock: 2295 MHz versus not recorded
• Boost clock: 2550 MHz versus not recorded
• Memory clock: 1438 MHz 23 Gbps effective versus 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
• Memory size: 16 GB versus 24 GB
• Memory type: GDDR6X versus GDDR6
• Memory bus width: 256 bit versus 192 bit
• Memory bandwidth: 736.3 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s
• Shading units: 10240 versus 6144
• TMUs: 320 versus 192
• ROPs: 112 versus 96
• RT cores: 80 versus not recorded
• Tensor cores: 320 versus not recorded
• Pixel rate: 285.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 816.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s
• FP32: 52.22 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS
• FP16: 52.22 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 320 W versus 225 W
• Slot width: Triple-slot versus Dual-slot
• Suggested PSU: 700 W versus 550 W
• Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
• Vulkan version: 1.4 versus 1.3
• Dimensions: 310 mm x 140 mm x 61 mm versus 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm
• Production status: End-of-life versus Active
• Release date: 2024-01-30 versus 2026-03-16
• Launch MSRP: 999 USD versus not recorded

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between the RTX 4080 SUPER and the LX PRO. There are zero wins recorded for either card in direct comparison. The absence of paired test data means no direct performance deltas can be computed.

The RTX 4080 SUPER does have a complete individual benchmark suite. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 it scores 6,600. Geekbench OpenCL returns 219,065, and Geekbench Vulkan returns 260,075. Passmark tests show 193 in DirectX 10, 301 in DirectX 11, 134 in DirectX 12, and 381 in DirectX 9. The Passmark G2D score is 1,270, the G3D score is 34,245, and the GPU compute score is 19,822. The average of all benchmarks is 54,209.

The LX PRO has an empty benchmark list. No individual test scores exist, no average score exists, and no percentile ranking beyond the base 50th percentile is recorded. The database cannot calculate any comparative wins or losses. The RTX 4080 SUPER's nearest rivals are all other GPUs, not the LX PRO, which further confirms that no direct comparison data has been captured.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4080 SUPER wins in every category where measurable data exists. Its FP32 throughput of 52.22 TFLOPS is more than double the LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 816.0 GTexel/s is more than double the LX PRO's 384.0 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate of 285.6 GPixel/s exceeds 192.0 GPixel/s by nearly 50%. Its memory bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s is 70% higher than 432.0 GB/s. It has more shading units, more TMUs, more ROPs, and the only recorded RT and tensor core counts.

The LX PRO wins in areas unrelated to raw compute speed. It has 24 GB of memory versus 16 GB, which benefits workloads that need large frame buffers or model weights. It has a lower TDP of 225 W versus 320 W, and a lower suggested PSU of 550 W versus 700 W. It is physically smaller in all three dimensions and takes a dual-slot configuration instead of triple-slot. It also has four DisplayPort outputs, one more than the RTX 4080 SUPER's three.

The FP16 comparison is close: the RTX 4080 SUPER delivers 52.22 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the LX PRO delivers 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The LX PRO is therefore within 6% of the RTX 4080 SUPER in half-precision compute, despite being far behind in FP32. That suggests the LX PRO's architecture prioritizes FP16 throughput, possibly for AI inference workloads that tolerate reduced precision.

The production status also differs. The RTX 4080 SUPER is end-of-life, released on 2024-01-30, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series. The LX PRO is active, released on 2026-03-16, with no recorded predecessor or successor. For buyers seeking a current product with ongoing availability, the LX PRO holds that distinction. For buyers seeking verified performance, the RTX 4080 SUPER remains the only card with recorded evidence, despite its end-of-life status. The data does not support a definitive use-case split beyond these observations, because the LX PRO's performance has not been measured.