NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37,648, placing it in the 81st percentile among all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of 0, placing it in the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the RTX 4070 in the database?

A: The RTX 4070 sits within 1.3% of four GPUs: the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (0.1% higher), AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (0.4% higher), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (1.3% higher), and AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (1.3% lower).

Q: Which GPU has more memory?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, double the 12 GB of GDDR6X on the RTX 4070. However, the RTX 4070 delivers higher memory bandwidth at 504.2 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the production statuses of the two cards?

A: The RTX 4070 is listed as end-of-life, having been released on April 11, 2023. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is listed as active, with a release date of March 16, 2026.

Q: Do both cards support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. They differ in Vulkan support: the RTX 4070 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The RTX 4070 delivers 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is higher than the LX PRO’s 24.58 TFLOPS. The LX PRO counters with 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio), while the RTX 4070 offers 29.15 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1 ratio).

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 uses the AD104 chip built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with an Ada Lovelace architecture. It packs 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on TSMC’s 6 nm process with a TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The RTX 4070 integrates 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. The LX PRO lists no RT cores or tensor cores in its specifications. This indicates a fundamental difference in feature support: the RTX 4070 is designed for ray-traced rendering and DLSS-style tensor operations, while the LX PRO’s TrueGPU architecture appears to omit these dedicated units.

Shader organization also differs. The RTX 4070 has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The LX PRO has more of each: 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Despite having fewer shaders, the RTX 4070 achieves higher pixel rate (158.4 GPixel/s vs 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO) and higher texture rate (455.4 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel/s). The LX PRO’s higher ROP count gives it a pixel throughput advantage, but its lower texture rate suggests less efficient texture processing per TMU.

Clock behavior is another key differentiator. The RTX 4070 has explicit base and boost clocks of 1920 MHz and 2475 MHz, while the LX PRO has no recorded base or boost clocks. The LX PRO’s memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), compared to the RTX 4070’s 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The RTX 4070’s GDDR6X memory achieves higher bandwidth despite a narrower effective clock advantage, thanks to its memory type.

The LX PRO uses GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, matching the RTX 4070’s bus width but with slower memory technology. Both cards use a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and a single 16-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. The LX PRO has a higher TDP at 225 W versus 200 W for the RTX 4070.

Display outputs differ: the RTX 4070 provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the LX PRO offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a with no HDMI port. Physical dimensions favor the RTX 4070, which is shorter (240 mm vs 248 mm), narrower (110 mm vs 118 mm), and thinner (40 mm vs 48 mm).

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents a clear split. The RTX 4070 has substantial recorded performance across ten tests, an average score of 37,648, and sits in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The LX PRO has zero recorded benchmarks, an average score of 0, and sits in the 50th percentile. Any consumer deciding between the two based on measured performance must favor the RTX 4070, as the database contains no evidence of the LX PRO’s real-world capabilities.

The RTX 4070’s nearest rivals in the database (Tesla P4, RX Vega 56, RTX 4080 Mobile, and PRO W6400) all score within 1.3% of its average, confirming that it occupies a well-established performance tier. The LX PRO lacks any rival data, making it impossible to position it relative to known GPUs.

For users requiring ray tracing or tensor operations, the RTX 4070 is the only option with dedicated RT and tensor cores. The LX PRO’s lack of these units means it cannot accelerate such workloads in the same manner. The RTX 4070 also leads in FP32 compute (29.15 TFLOPS vs 24.58 TFLOPS), memory bandwidth (504.2 GB/s vs 432.0 GB/s), and pixel rate (158.4 GPixel/s vs 192.0 GPixel/s, though the LX PRO leads here).

The LX PRO’s advantages are limited to memory capacity (24 GB vs 12 GB), FP16 compute (49.15 TFLOPS vs 29.15 TFLOPS), ROP count (96 vs 64), and a higher pixel rate. These specifications suggest a card aimed at large-memory workloads or FP16-heavy compute, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm such use cases. The RTX 4070 remains the validated choice based on every recorded measurement.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | AD104 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TrueGPU |

| Generation | GeForce 40 | 7G100 |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 35,800 million | unknown |

| Die size | 294 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 121.8M / mm² | null |

| Base clock | 1920 MHz | null |

| Boost clock | 2475 MHz | null |

| Memory clock | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 12 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |

| Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 5888 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 184 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT cores | 46 | null |

| Tensor cores | 184 | null |

| Pixel rate | 158.4 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 455.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 29.15 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 200 W | 225 W |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | 248 mm (9.8 inches) |

| Height | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 118 mm (4.6 inches) |

| Width | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | 48 mm (1.9 inches) |

| Production status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release date | 2023-04-11 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 599 USD | null |

Both cards share the same PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, dual-slot width, 192-bit memory bus, single 16-pin power connector, 550 W suggested PSU, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), and OpenGL 4.6 support.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records ten benchmark scores for the RTX 4070 and none for the LX PRO. This asymmetry means the head-to-head comparison is one-sided, but the available numbers define the RTX 4070’s performance envelope precisely.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), the RTX 4070 scores 3,854. This test stresses modern directX 12 rendering, and the score places the card in a range consistent with its 81st percentile standing. The LX PRO has no equivalent score, so no direct comparison is possible.

Geekbench results show strong compute and graphics performance. The RTX 4070 scores 154,858 in OpenCL and 174,152 in Vulkan. The Vulkan score exceeds the OpenCL score by 12.5%, indicating efficient use of the Vulkan 1.4 API that the LX PRO lacks (it supports Vulkan 1.3). The higher Vulkan score also reflects the RTX 4070’s capable driver and hardware scheduling.

PassMark results break down by DirectX version. The RTX 4070 scores 320 in DirectX 9, 244 in DirectX 11, 139 in DirectX 10, and 103 in DirectX 12. The DirectX 9 score is more than triple the DirectX 12 score, which is typical for this benchmark suite where legacy APIs often show higher raw rasterization throughput. The DirectX 11 score of 244 sits between the DX9 and DX10 results, confirming a consistent scaling pattern across API generations.

The PassMark G3D score of 26,927 and G2D score of 1,164 provide overall graphics and 2D performance metrics. The compute-oriented PassMark GPU Compute score of 14,720 is roughly 55% of the G3D score, indicating that compute workloads are handled well but not at the same throughput as graphics rendering.

The average benchmark score of 37,648 is the aggregate of these ten tests. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla P4, scores 37,628, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37,507 (0.4% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38,135 (1.3% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37,157 (1.3% lower). These tight margins show the RTX 4070’s performance tier is competitive with several distinct GPUs, but the LX PRO cannot be placed in this ranking due to missing data.

The LX PRO’s theoretical specifications suggest it could compete in specific areas. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 is 15.7% below the RTX 4070’s 29.15 TFLOPS. Its FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS is 68.6% higher than the RTX 4070’s 29.15 TFLOPS, but the RTX 4070’s 1:1 FP16 ratio means it does not sacrifice FP32 throughput to achieve FP16. The LX PRO’s 2:1 ratio implies a split architecture where FP16 runs at twice the rate, a design choice that benefits certain compute workloads but not general graphics.

Memory bandwidth favors the RTX 4070 by 16.7% (504.2 GB/s vs 432.0 GB/s). The LX PRO’s 24 GB capacity is double the RTX 4070’s 12 GB, which could matter for large datasets, but without benchmark verification, this advantage remains speculative. The LX PRO’s higher pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s vs 158.4 GPixel/s) and ROP count (96 vs 64) suggest stronger fill-rate performance, but the RTX 4070’s higher texture rate (455.4 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel/s) indicates better texture throughput.

The RTX 4070’s 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration that the LX PRO entirely lacks, as it lists no such units. For any workload involving ray tracing or tensor-based AI inference, the RTX 4070 has dedicated silicon while the LX PRO would rely on shader-based fallbacks. The database contains no measurements for the LX PRO, so its actual performance in these scenarios cannot be assessed. The recorded data, therefore, shows the RTX 4070 as the only card with verified performance in any benchmark category.