NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins the most head-to-head benchmark comparisons?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 wins 8 of the 9 shared benchmark tests, with the only loss coming in PassMark DirectX 10 where the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile leads by 7.9%.

Q: How large is the performance gap in the biggest benchmark win?

A: The RTX 4070 dominates PassMark GPU Compute by 45.7%, scoring 14,720 versus 10,101 for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. The second-largest margin is 25.1% in Geekbench Vulkan.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37,648, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile averages 35,435. The RTX 4070 also sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, compared to the 80th percentile for the mobile part.

Q: Do both GPUs use the same memory capacity and bus width?

A: Yes, both feature 12 GB of memory on a 192-bit bus. However, the RTX 4070 uses GDDR6X with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses GDDR7 with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The RTX 4070 boosts to 2475 MHz, substantially higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 1447 MHz. The RTX 4070 also has a higher base clock at 1920 MHz versus 847 MHz.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each GPU based on average score?

A: The RTX 4070's closest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (0.1% difference), while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's nearest is the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 (-0.2% difference). The RTX 4070 also sits 1.3% behind the RTX 4080 Mobile.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs represent distinct architectural generations from NVIDIA. The RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB205 chip. Both are manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process, yet the transistor counts differ notably: the RTX 4070 packs 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile contains 31,100 million transistors on a smaller 263 mm² die. This yields a slightly higher transistor density for the desktop part at 121.8M per mm² versus 118.3M per mm².

The shading core counts are identical — both have 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, 46 ray tracing cores, and 184 tensor cores. However, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 80 ROPs compared to 64 on the RTX 4070, a 25% increase in raster output units. The clock speeds tell a different story: the RTX 4070 runs at 1920 MHz base and 2475 MHz boost, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile operates at just 847 MHz base and 1447 MHz boost. This clock disparity drives major differences in raw throughput.

Memory architecture diverges as well. Both use a 192-bit bus and 12 GB capacity, but the RTX 4070 employs GDDR6X at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) for 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses GDDR7 at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) delivering 672.0 GB/s — a 33% bandwidth advantage. The power profiles are polar opposites: the RTX 4070 consumes 200 W with a dual-slot cooler and a 16-pin connector, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sips just 60 W and is designed as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RTX 4070 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data reveals a consistent pattern of RTX 4070 superiority, but the margins vary dramatically by workload. The most striking result is in PassMark GPU Compute, where the RTX 4070 scores 14,720 against 10,101 — a 45.7% advantage. This suggests the desktop card's higher clocks translate into substantially better compute throughput for non-graphics workloads. Similarly, Geekbench Vulkan shows a 25.1% lead (174,152 vs 139,213), and PassMark DirectX 9 shows a 23.6% margin (320 vs 259).

In modern API benchmarks, the gap narrows but remains positive for the RTX 4070. PassMark DirectX 11 sees the desktop card ahead by 3% (244 vs 237), while PassMark DirectX 12 shows a razor-thin 1% edge (103 vs 102). These small margins hint that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's newer architecture and faster memory partially compensate for its much lower clock speeds in contemporary graphics workloads.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's sole victory comes in PassMark DirectX 10, where it scores 151 versus 139 — a 7.9% win. This outlier is curious given the older API, and it suggests the mobile GPU's higher ROP count may provide an advantage in specific legacy rasterization paths. The RTX 4070 also wins Geekbench OpenCL by 7.6% (154,858 vs 143,870) and PassMark G2D by 18.7% (1,164 vs 981). The overall 3D gaming picture is clear: PassMark G3D shows the RTX 4070 ahead by 12.2% (26,927 vs 24,004).

Specification Differences

| Specification | RTX 4070 | RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Chip | AD104 | GB205 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 35,800 million | 31,100 million |

| Die Size | 294 mm² | 263 mm² |

| Base Clock | 1920 MHz | 847 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 1447 MHz |

| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |

| Memory Clock | 1313 MHz (21 Gbps) | 1750 MHz (28 Gbps) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |

| ROPs | 64 | 80 |

| Pixel Rate | 158.4 GPixel/s | 115.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 455.4 GTexel/s | 266.2 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 29.15 TFLOPS | 17.04 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 29.15 TFLOPS | 17.04 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 200 W | 60 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |

| Release Date | 2023-04-11 | 2025-02-28 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Launch MSRP | 599 USD | None |

The RTX 4070 holds decisive advantages in clock speeds, FP32 throughput (29.15 TFLOPS vs 17.04 TFLOPS), pixel rate, and texture rate. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile counters with faster memory bandwidth, more ROPs, newer PCIe generation, and dramatically lower power consumption. The desktop card is dual-slot with a 16-pin connector; the mobile part is an IGP with no connector.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 is the clear winner in raw compute and legacy API performance. Its 45.7% GPU Compute lead and 25.1% Vulkan advantage indicate strong suitability for general-purpose compute tasks, content creation workloads, and applications leveraging Vulkan for rendering. The 23.6% DirectX 9 margin and 18.7% G2D win suggest it also handles older games and 2D interfaces with more headroom. For modern DirectX 11 and 12 titles, the RTX 4070 still wins, but by smaller margins of 3% and 1%, respectively — indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's architecture and memory bandwidth nearly close the gap in current-generation gaming APIs.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's unique strengths lie in its efficiency and bandwidth. Its 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is 33% higher than the RTX 4070, and its 80 ROPs provide a theoretical advantage in fill-rate-bound scenarios. The single DirectX 10 win (7.9%) suggests it may handle certain legacy rasterization paths better. More importantly, its 60 W TDP versus 200 W means it can deliver competitive modern-API performance in thin-and-light laptops without discrete power connectors. The mobile GPU's PCIe 5.0 interface and active production status also point to a longer support lifecycle. Its average score of 35,435 still places it in the 80th percentile of all GPUs, just one percentile below the RTX 4070.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally favors the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 for users who prioritize raw performance. It wins 8 of 9 benchmarks, holds a 6.2% higher average benchmark score (37,648 vs 35,435), and delivers a massive 45.7% edge in compute workloads. The desktop card's higher clocks and transistor count translate into superior FP32 throughput, faster pixel and texture rates, and better overall 3D performance. For desktop builders seeking maximum frame rates and compute capability, the RTX 4070 — despite being end-of-life — remains the stronger choice, backed by a 81st percentile ranking and launch MSRP of 599 USD.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, however, tells a different story for mobile users. Its 60 W power envelope, IGP form factor, and lack of power connectors make it suitable for laptops where the RTX 4070's 200 W desktop design is physically impossible. The 33% higher memory bandwidth and additional ROPs show architectural intent toward efficiency rather than brute force. In modern DirectX 11 and 12 benchmarks, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile comes within 1–3% of the RTX 4070, which is remarkable given its 41% lower boost clock. For gamers who prioritize portability and battery life over absolute frame rates, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile offers near-desktop-class modern gaming performance in a fraction of the power budget. The choice ultimately hinges on form factor: desktop users should pick the RTX 4070, while laptop buyers should consider the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile for its efficiency and active production status.