NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

CORE STATE AD104
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2610 MHz
TDP 285 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

CORE STATE AD103
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2550 MHz
TDP 320 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
5,024
6,600
geekbench_opencl
176,953
219,065
geekbench_vulkan
213,808
260,075
passmark_directx_10
187
193
passmark_directx_11
288
301
passmark_directx_12
116
134
passmark_directx_9
352
381
passmark_g2d
1,200
1,270
passmark_g3d
31,624
34,245
passmark_gpu_compute
18,396
19,822

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clean sweep for the RTX 4080 SUPER across all ten benchmark comparisons, with no wins for the RTX 4070 Ti in any test. The most decisive margin appears in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 6600 against 5024, a 31.4% advantage. That is the single largest delta between the two cards and highlights the gap in raw rasterization performance under a modern DirectX 12 workload.

Compute-oriented tests also favor the larger card substantially. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4080 SUPER posts 219065 versus 176953, a 23.8% lead. The Vulkan result is similarly lopsided: 260075 against 213808, or 21.6% ahead. These two tests suggest that the RTX 4080 SUPER scales better not just in gaming but also in general-purpose GPU workloads, which is consistent with its higher shading unit count and memory bandwidth.

The legacy DirectX benchmark suite shows smaller, but still consistent, wins. PassMark DirectX 12 gives the RTX 4080 SUPER a 15.5% edge (134 vs 116), while DirectX 11 shows only a 4.5% gap (301 vs 288). DirectX 10 is the closest call of all, with the RTX 4080 SUPER at 193 and the RTX 4070 Ti at 187, a mere 3.2% difference. DirectX 9 lands in between at 8.2% (381 vs 352). These older API tests compress the performance delta, likely because they are less sensitive to memory bandwidth and raw FP32 throughput.

The PassMark G3D and GPU Compute results round out the picture. In G3D, the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 34245 versus 31624, an 8.3% lead. GPU Compute shows 19822 against 18396, a 7.8% difference. The 2D test is the least demanding of all: 1270 versus 1200, a 5.8% advantage. Across the board, the RTX 4080 SUPER wins every single head-to-head matchup, with no test where the RTX 4070 Ti manages to close the gap to under 3%.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the RTX 4080 SUPER wins in every measurable category. There is no recorded test where the RTX 4070 Ti comes out ahead. That said, the size of the victory varies meaningfully by workload type, which helps clarify where each card is best suited.

The RTX 4080 SUPER is the clear choice for demanding modern workloads. Its 31.4% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 indicates a major advantage in current-generation game engines that leverage DirectX 12 Ultimate features. The 23.8% and 21.6% leads in OpenCL and Vulkan, respectively, suggest it is also the better pick for compute-heavy applications like rendering, simulation, or machine learning inference that use those APIs. If the priority is maximum frame rates in the latest titles or faster throughput in GPU-accelerated tasks, the data points decisively to the RTX 4080 SUPER.

The RTX 4070 Ti, by contrast, does not win any category, but its closest results offer some insight. In DirectX 10, the gap narrows to 3.2%, and in DirectX 11 it is 4.5%. These are older APIs that place less strain on memory bandwidth and shader throughput, so the RTX 4070 Ti is relatively more competitive there. For users whose software library is dominated by older games or legacy applications, the RTX 4070 Ti sacrifices very little in absolute terms. The PassMark G3D score, with an 8.3% gap, also shows that in general 3D rendering the RTX 4070 Ti is not far behind, making it a reasonable option for those who do not need the absolute top-end performance.

Architecture Differences

Both cards are built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and use TSMC's 5 nm process node, so the fundamental design philosophy is identical. The differences come down to chip size, resource allocation, and memory configuration.

The RTX 4080 SUPER uses the AD103 chip, which packs 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The RTX 4070 Ti uses the smaller AD104 chip, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. Transistor density is nearly identical, at 121.1M per mm² versus 121.8M per mm², meaning the performance gap comes from having more silicon rather than denser logic. The RTX 4080 SUPER carries 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. The RTX 4070 Ti has 7,680 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. That translates to a 33% advantage in shader count and a 40% advantage in ROPs for the larger card.

Ray tracing and tensor core counts follow the same pattern. The RTX 4080 SUPER has 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, while the RTX 4070 Ti has 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. The FP32 throughput is 52.22 TFLOPS for the RTX 4080 SUPER versus 40.09 TFLOPS for the RTX 4070 Ti, a 30% difference that aligns closely with the shader unit disparity. FP16 performance is a 1:1 match with FP32 on both cards.

Memory is another major differentiator. The RTX 4080 SUPER comes with 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, yielding 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, with 504.2 GB/s. That is a 46% bandwidth advantage for the RTX 4080 SUPER, which helps explain the large delta in memory-sensitive tests like 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Clock speeds are close: the RTX 4080 SUPER runs at 2295 MHz base and 2550 MHz boost, while the RTX 4070 Ti runs slightly higher at 2310 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost. The RTX 4070 Ti's higher clocks do not compensate for its fewer resources.

Power and physical design also diverge. The RTX 4080 SUPER has a 320 W TDP and requires a 700 W suggested PSU, while the RTX 4070 Ti draws 285 W with a 600 W suggested PSU. The RTX 4080 SUPER is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. The RTX 4070 Ti is a dual-slot card at 285 mm long, 112 mm tall, and 42 mm wide. Both use a single 16-pin power connector and offer the same display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. API support is identical, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

The benchmark database is unambiguous: the RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms the RTX 4070 Ti in every recorded test, with win counts of 10 to 0. The average benchmark score tells the same story, with the RTX 4080 SUPER at 54209 against 44795 for the RTX 4070 Ti, a 21% overall gap. In percentile terms, the RTX 4080 SUPER sits at the 86th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 4070 Ti sits at the 84th.

For the buyer who demands maximum performance in modern DirectX 12 titles and compute-heavy applications, the RTX 4080 SUPER is the only choice from this pair. Its 31.4% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 23.8% lead in Geekbench OpenCL are substantial enough to justify the extra cost for anyone prioritizing frame rates or render times. The 16 GB memory capacity and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth also give it a clear edge for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

For the buyer who is more cost-sensitive or constrained by case size, the RTX 4070 Ti remains a capable option. Its closest results come in legacy DirectX tests, where it trails by only 3.2% to 4.5%, and its dual-slot, 285 mm form factor fits in far more chassis. At 285 W TDP with a 600 W suggested PSU, it is also easier to power. However, the data shows no scenario where the RTX 4070 Ti wins, so the choice comes down to whether the performance gap is acceptable for the savings.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 4080 SUPER in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 6600, while the RTX 4070 Ti scores 5024. That is a 31.4% advantage for the RTX 4080 SUPER.

Q: Which card has more VRAM?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, while the RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory.

Q: Are the two cards the same physical size?

A: No. The RTX 4080 SUPER is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm x 140 mm x 61 mm, while the RTX 4070 Ti is a dual-slot card measuring 285 mm x 112 mm x 42 mm.

Q: Do both cards support the same display outputs?

A: Yes, both offer 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has a 320 W TDP with a 700 W suggested PSU, while the RTX 4070 Ti has a 285 W TDP with a 600 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which card wins in Geekbench Vulkan?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 260075 versus 213808 for the RTX 4070 Ti, a 21.6% lead.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |

|----------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------|

| Chip | AD103 | AD104 |

| Transistors | 45,900 million | 35,800 million |

| Die Size | 379 mm² | 294 mm² |

| Base Clock | 2295 MHz | 2310 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz | 2610 MHz |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 736.3 GB/s | 504.2 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 10240 | 7680 |

| TMUs | 320 | 240 |

| ROPs | 112 | 80 |

| RT Cores | 80 | 60 |

| Tensor Cores | 320 | 240 |

| Pixel Rate | 285.6 GPixel/s | 208.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 816.0 GTexel/s | 626.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 52.22 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 320 W | 285 W |

| Slot Width | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |

| Suggested PSU | 700 W | 600 W |

| Length | 310 mm | 285 mm |

| Height | 140 mm | 112 mm |

| Width | 61 mm | 42 mm |

| Launch MSRP | 999 USD | 799 USD |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 4070 Ti
RTX 4080 SUPER
Core Specs
Shading Units
7,680
10,240 +33.3%
Shaders
7,680
10,240 +33.3%
TMUs
240
320 +33.3%
ROPs
80
112 +40.0%
SM Count
60
80 +33.3%
Clocks
Base Clock
2310 MHz
2295 MHz
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
2550 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
1438 MHz 23 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
16,384 +33.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
192 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
736.3 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
48 MB
64 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
208.8 GPixel/s
285.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
626.4 GTexel/s
816.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
40.09 TFLOPS
52.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
626.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
816.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
40.09 TFLOPS (1:1)
52.22 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
60
80 +33.3%
Tensor Cores
240
320 +33.3%
Power
TDP
285 W
320 W
TDP (W)
285
320 +12.3%
Suggested PSU
600 W
700 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
AD104
AD103
Generation
GeForce 40
GeForce 40
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
35,800 million
45,900 million
Die Size
294 mm²
379 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
121.8M / mm²
121.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
8.9
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Triple-slot
Length
285 mm 11.2 inches
310 mm 12.2 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
140 mm 5.5 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
799 USD
999 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 30
GeForce 30
Successor
GeForce 50
GeForce 50
View GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Details View GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER Details