NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX Comparison

The Verdict

The data tells a clear story: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the faster card in nearly every benchmark that matters for modern gaming and compute, winning 9 of 10 head-to-head tests. The NVIDIA TITAN RTX takes only one victory, but it is a decisive one in Vulkan compute. If you need raw DirectX performance, the 4070 Ti SUPER is the obvious pick — it leads by 31.9% in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and by 35.6% in PassMark G3D. The TITAN RTX, despite its older Turing architecture and 12 nm node, still holds a 153.5% advantage in Geekbench Vulkan, which suggests it has a unique strength in that specific API workload. For a builder choosing between these two end-of-life cards, the 4070 Ti SUPER is the default recommendation for gaming and general compute, while the TITAN RTX is only worth considering if your software specifically leverages Vulkan compute heavily.

Both cards sit at the 76th percentile among all GPUs, meaning they are statistically peers in overall standing. Their average benchmark scores are nearly identical: the TITAN RTX averages 31,676, while the 4070 Ti SUPER averages 31,087 — a difference of just 1.9%. This is a rare case where the overall average masks a lopsided head-to-head record. The 4070 Ti SUPER’s wins are broad but not always massive, while the TITAN RTX’s single Vulkan win is enormous. In practical terms, the 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer choice for a wide range of applications, but the TITAN RTX should not be dismissed outright if your workload is Vulkan-centric.

Architecture Differences

The two cards represent two distinct generations of NVIDIA design. The TITAN RTX uses the TU102 chip built on Turing architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 12 nm process. It packs 18,600 million transistors on a 754 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 24.7M per mm². The 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip on Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It crams 45,900 million transistors onto a much smaller 379 mm² die, achieving a density of 121.1M per mm² — nearly five times denser. This node advantage is the foundation of the 4070 Ti SUPER’s efficiency and clock speed gains.

Core configuration differs significantly. The TITAN RTX has 4,608 shading units, 288 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, alongside 72 RT cores and 576 tensor cores. The 4070 Ti SUPER has far more shading units at 8,448, but fewer TMUs at 264 and the same 96 ROPs. Its RT core count is lower at 66, and its tensor core count is drastically lower at 264. Despite fewer tensor cores, the 4070 Ti SUPER’s FP16 throughput is 44.10 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the TITAN RTX achieves 32.62 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The FP32 numbers are even more divergent: the 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 44.10 TFLOPS versus the TITAN RTX’s 16.31 TFLOPS — a 2.7x gap.

Clock speeds reflect the architectural leap. The TITAN RTX has a base clock of 1350 MHz and a boost of 1770 MHz. The 4070 Ti SUPER starts at 2340 MHz base and boosts to 2610 MHz. Memory technology also differs: the TITAN RTX uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus, while the 4070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus. Remarkably, their memory bandwidth is nearly identical — 672.0 GB/s for the TITAN RTX versus 672.3 GB/s for the 4070 Ti SUPER. The 4070 Ti SUPER compensates for the narrower bus with faster 21 Gbps effective memory speed, versus 14 Gbps on the TITAN RTX.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test is a clear win for the 4070 Ti SUPER, scoring 5,569 versus 3,794 for the TITAN RTX — a 31.9% advantage. This is a modern DirectX 12 workload, and the Ada Lovelace architecture’s higher clocks and shader throughput show through. Geekbench OpenCL follows the same pattern: the 4070 Ti SUPER scores 199,267 against 144,858, a 27.3% lead. In PassMark G3D, the gap widens to 35.6%, with scores of 31,811 versus 20,491. The 4070 Ti SUPER also dominates PassMark GPU Compute, scoring 18,372 against 10,034 — a 45.4% lead, the largest of its wins.

The TITAN RTX’s lone victory comes in Geekbench Vulkan, where it scores 136,073 against the 4070 Ti SUPER’s 53,683. That is a 153.5% margin, which is extraordinary. This suggests the TITAN RTX’s older architecture has a particular strength in Vulkan compute that the newer card lacks — possibly related to its higher tensor core count or different scheduling behavior. No other benchmark shows even a hint of this pattern, so it is an isolated but important data point.

Across the PassMark DirectX suite, the 4070 Ti SUPER is consistently ahead. In DirectX 9, it wins by 38.1% (360 versus 223). In DirectX 11, it leads by 32% (278 versus 189). In DirectX 12, the margin is 26.1% (119 versus 88). Even in DirectX 10, which is an older API, it wins by 18.8% (181 versus 147). The 4070 Ti SUPER also wins in PassMark G2D, scoring 1,225 against 860, a 29.8% lead. These results paint a picture of a card that is simply faster across every DirectX iteration and in general compute, with the Vulkan anomaly being the only exception.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |

| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 18,600 million | 45,900 million |

| Die Size | 754 mm² | 379 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 24.7M / mm² | 121.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1350 MHz | 2340 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2610 MHz |

| Memory | 24 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6X |

| Memory Bus | 384 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Speed | 14 Gbps effective | 21 Gbps effective |

| Shading Units | 4608 | 8448 |

| TMUs | 288 | 264 |

| RT Cores | 72 | 66 |

| Tensor Cores | 576 | 264 |

| FP32 | 16.31 TFLOPS | 44.10 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 32.62 TFLOPS (2:1) | 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 250.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 509.8 GTexel/s | 689.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 280 W | 285 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Triple-slot |

| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Dimensions (LxHxW) | 267 x 116 x 35 mm | 310 x 140 x 61 mm |

The TITAN RTX offers more memory (24 GB versus 16 GB) and a wider 384-bit bus, but the 4070 Ti SUPER matches its bandwidth with faster GDDR6X. The 4070 Ti SUPER has nearly double the shading units and more than double the FP32 throughput. It also has a higher pixel rate (250.6 versus 169.9 GPixel/s) and texture rate (689.0 versus 509.8 GTexel/s). Power draw is nearly identical at 280 W versus 285 W, and both suggest a 600 W PSU. The 4070 Ti SUPER is physically larger — 310 mm long versus 267 mm — and takes three slots instead of two.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher overall average benchmark scores?

A: The NVIDIA TITAN RTX has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 31,676, compared to the 4070 Ti SUPER’s 31,087. The difference is only 1.9%, and both cards sit at the 76th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Why does the TITAN RTX win Geekbench Vulkan by so much?

A: The TITAN RTX scores 136,073 in Geekbench Vulkan versus 53,683 for the 4070 Ti SUPER, a 153.5% advantage. This is the only benchmark where the TITAN RTX wins, and the margin is large enough to suggest a fundamental architectural strength in Vulkan compute workloads.

Q: Is the 4070 Ti SUPER better in DirectX 12?

A: Yes. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the 4070 Ti SUPER scores 5,569 against 3,794 for the TITAN RTX, a 31.9% lead. In PassMark DirectX 12, it also wins, scoring 119 versus 88, a 26.1% margin.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare between the two?

A: They are effectively identical. The TITAN RTX has 672.0 GB/s bandwidth from 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus, while the 4070 Ti SUPER has 672.3 GB/s from 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Which card has more RT cores?

A: The TITAN RTX has 72 RT cores, while the 4070 Ti SUPER has 66. However, the 4070 Ti SUPER has far more shading units (8,448 versus 4,608) and higher clock speeds.

Q: What are the launch MSRPs?

A: The NVIDIA TITAN RTX launched at 2,499 USD, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at 799 USD.

Where Each One Wins

The 4070 Ti SUPER is the winner for DirectX gaming across the board. It leads in every PassMark DirectX test — 9, 10, 11, and 12 — with margins ranging from 18.8% to 38.1%. It also wins in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a modern DX12 benchmark, and in Geekbench OpenCL. For general compute, the PassMark GPU Compute score shows a 45.4% advantage, making it the better choice for rendering, simulation, or any CUDA-adjacent workload that uses OpenCL. Its higher FP32 throughput of 44.10 TFLOPS versus 16.31 TFLOPS reinforces this. The 4070 Ti SUPER also wins in 2D performance (PassMark G2D) by 29.8%, which is relevant for desktop compositing or multi-monitor setups.

The TITAN RTX wins in exactly one scenario: Geekbench Vulkan. Its 153.5% margin there is so large that it cannot be ignored for developers or users running Vulkan-based compute pipelines. The card’s higher RT core count (72 versus 66) and tensor core count (576 versus 264) may contribute to this, though the benchmark data does not specify the cause. If your application is Vulkan-centric, the TITAN RTX is worth serious consideration despite its losses elsewhere. For a mixed workload, the 4070 Ti SUPER’s broad dominance makes it the more versatile pick. The TITAN RTX’s 24 GB memory advantage could also matter for very large datasets, but the benchmark data does not show a corresponding performance win in any tested scenario.