NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA T600 Mobile Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER decisively outperforms the NVIDIA T600 Mobile across every shared benchmark metric, with the data showing a complete sweep in the head-to-head comparison. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 199,267 against the T600 Mobile’s 35,486, a commanding 82.2% advantage, while its Geekbench Vulkan score of 53,683 surpasses the T600 Mobile’s 30,211 by 43.7%. These results place the two GPUs in entirely different performance tiers, despite their similar overall percentile rankings.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is in Geekbench OpenCL, where the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s score of 199,267 dwarfs the T600 Mobile’s 35,486. This represents an 82.2% delta in favor of the larger card, a gap that reflects the fundamental difference in compute resources between a 40-watt mobile workstation part and a 285-watt desktop flagship. The T600 Mobile’s score, while modest, still places it in the 77th percentile of all GPUs, showing that it holds its own against other low-power parts. However, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 76th percentile is somewhat misleading; its average benchmark score of 31,087 is dragged down by legacy DirectX tests, but its raw compute performance is in a different league.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the margin narrows but remains lopsided. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 53,683 versus the T600 Mobile’s 30,211, a 43.7% lead. This smaller gap suggests that the T600 Mobile’s Turing architecture handles Vulkan workloads relatively efficiently per unit of hardware, but it cannot overcome the sheer scale of the Ada Lovelace GPU’s 8,448 shading units versus 896. The T600 Mobile’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA T550 Mobile, averages 33,161, just 0.9% higher, confirming that the T600 Mobile is competitive within its own niche but utterly outclassed by the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s nearest rivals further illustrate its standing. It sits 0.4% below the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 (average score 31,206), 0.4% below the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q (31,220), and 1.9% below the NVIDIA TITAN RTX (31,676). These are all older or specialized parts, and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 16 GB of GDDR6X memory give it a modern edge that raw averages do not fully capture. For the T600 Mobile, its rivals include the NVIDIA P104-100 (average 32,982, 0.4% higher) and the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME (32,601, 0.8% higher), showing that it trades blows with desktop parts from a previous generation.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the superior GPU in every measurable way. It wins both head-to-head benchmarks, with an 82.2% lead in OpenCL and a 43.7% lead in Vulkan. Anyone needing maximum compute performance, high-resolution gaming, or professional 3D rendering should choose the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER without hesitation. Its 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 250.6 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 689.0 GTexel/s texture rate are orders of magnitude beyond the T600 Mobile’s 2.527 TFLOPS, 45.12 GPixel/s, and 78.96 GTexel/s.

The NVIDIA T600 Mobile, however, serves a specific purpose. Its 40 W TDP, IGP slot width, and lack of power connectors make it suitable for compact, power-constrained mobile workstations. The data shows that it delivers 77th percentile performance despite its constraints, making it a reasonable choice for light CAD work or basic GPU acceleration in a laptop. But for any workload that stresses the GPU, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only rational pick. The verdict is not close: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins on raw performance, memory capacity (16 GB versus 4 GB), and bandwidth (672.3 GB/s versus 192.0 GB/s), while the T600 Mobile’s only advantages are power efficiency and physical size.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural eras. The T600 Mobile uses the TU117 chip based on Turing architecture, built on TSMC’s 12 nm process node, with 4,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. In contrast, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip based on Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm node, packing 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die. This represents a transistor density of 23.5 million per mm² for the T600 Mobile versus 121.1 million per mm² for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, a 5x improvement in density that underpins the performance gap.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER features 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores, neither of which the T600 Mobile has. This makes the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads, while the T600 Mobile relies on pure rasterization. The memory subsystems differ dramatically: the T600 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also supports PCIe 4.0 x16 versus the T600 Mobile’s PCIe 3.0 x16, and its DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support exceeds the T600 Mobile’s DirectX 12 (12_1) implementation.

Clock speeds highlight the generational leap. The T600 Mobile runs at a base clock of 780 MHz and boosts to 1410 MHz, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER starts at 2340 MHz and boosts to 2610 MHz. Memory clocks are similarly disparate: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for the T600 Mobile versus 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The FP16 performance also differs, with the T600 Mobile achieving 5.053 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) versus the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating that the newer architecture handles half-precision workloads with full throughput.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has better OpenCL performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 199,267 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 82.2% higher than the NVIDIA T600 Mobile’s 35,486. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins this benchmark outright.

Q: How do the two compare in Vulkan benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads with a Geekbench Vulkan score of 53,683 versus the T600 Mobile’s 30,211, a 43.7% advantage. While the T600 Mobile is closer here, it still loses decisively.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The T600 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 32,849, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER averages 31,087. However, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s average is skewed by low legacy DirectX scores, so its real-world performance is far higher.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the T600 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s, compared to the T600 Mobile’s 192.0 GB/s. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory versus 4 GB of GDDR6.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The T600 Mobile has a TDP of 40 W, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also requires a 600 W suggested PSU and a 16-pin power connector, whereas the T600 Mobile uses none.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins in every performance category where data exists. It dominates in Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan, and its architectural advantages—66 ray tracing cores, 264 tensor cores, 8,448 shading units, and 44.10 TFLOPS FP32—make it the clear choice for gaming, 3D rendering, video editing, and any GPU-compute workload. Its 16 GB memory capacity and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth handle large datasets and high-resolution textures without bottlenecking. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s triple-slot design and 310 mm length indicate a desktop card meant for maximum throughput, not portability.

The T600 Mobile, conversely, wins on power efficiency and form factor. Its 40 W TDP, IGP slot width, and no power connectors make it ideal for thin-and-light laptops or embedded systems where space and thermal limits are paramount. Its 77th percentile ranking shows that it delivers respectable performance for its class, and its PCIe 3.0 x16 interface is sufficient for its modest bandwidth. For tasks like basic 2D acceleration, light CAD, or hardware video decode in a mobile workstation, the T600 Mobile is a competent choice. However, it has no path to competing with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in any compute-heavy scenario.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets reveal the full extent of the gap. The T600 Mobile uses the TU117 chip on a 12 nm process with 4,700 million transistors and a 200 mm² die, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip on a 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors and a 379 mm² die. Clock speeds differ substantially: base clocks are 780 MHz versus 2340 MHz, and boost clocks are 1410 MHz versus 2610 MHz. Memory configurations are 4 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus versus 16 GB GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, with bandwidths of 192.0 GB/s and 672.3 GB/s respectively.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, compared to the T600 Mobile’s 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Pixel and texture rates are 250.6 GPixel/s and 689.0 GTexel/s for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER versus 45.12 GPixel/s and 78.96 GTexel/s for the T600 Mobile. FP32 throughput is 44.10 TFLOPS versus 2.527 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 5.053 TFLOPS (2:1). Power requirements are starkly different: the T600 Mobile draws 40 W with no power connectors, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER draws 285 W with a 1x 16-pin connector and a 600 W suggested PSU. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16 for the T600 Mobile and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Display outputs are portable-device-dependent for the T600 Mobile, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER measures 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, while the T600 Mobile has no listed dimensions, reflecting its mobile integration.