NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA H20 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER versus the NVIDIA H20. The head-to-head benchmark field is empty, and the win counts for both cards are zero. This absence of comparative measurements means the database cannot produce a direct score-to-score comparison between these two accelerators.

What can be established from the database is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's standalone performance profile. Its average benchmark score is 31,087, which places it at the 76th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its closest measured rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 with an average score of 31,206, a delta of -0.4 percent, and the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q at 31,220, also a -0.4 percent delta. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 31,532, a -1.4 percent delta relative to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, while the NVIDIA TITAN RTX reaches 31,676, a -1.9 percent delta. These figures indicate the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sits just below those four rivals in aggregate benchmark performance, with margins ranging from 0.4 to 1.9 percent.

In individual tests, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,569. Its Geekbench OpenCL result is 199,267, while Geekbench Vulkan shows 53,683. Passmark results include a G3D score of 31,811, a GPU compute score of 18,372, a G2D score of 1,225, and legacy DirectX tests: DirectX 9 at 360, DirectX 10 at 181, DirectX 11 at 278, and DirectX 12 at 119. The H20 has no benchmark entries in the database, so no numerical comparison is possible for any of these tests.

The implications are straightforward. Without head-to-head data, conclusions must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than measured performance deltas. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's percentile ranking of 76 against all GPUs, paired with its average score, offers context for its standing, but the H20's percentile of 50 with an average score of zero reflects the absence of recorded benchmarks, not a measured performance level.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from distinct NVIDIA architectures and serve different market segments. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, part of the GeForce 40-series. Its process node is 5 nm at TSMC, with 45,900 million transistors on a die size of 379 mm², yielding a transistor density of 121.1 million per mm². The H20 uses the GH100 chip based on the Hopper architecture, belonging to the Server Hopper (Hxx) generation. Its 5 nm TSMC node houses 80,000 million transistors across a die size of 814 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 98.3 million per mm². The H20's die is more than twice the physical size of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's, and it packs nearly double the transistor count.

Clock behavior differs as well. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER runs at a base clock of 2340 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz. The H20 runs lower, with a base of 1830 MHz and a boost of 1980 MHz. Memory clocks are similar in raw MHz at 1313 MHz, but effective data rates diverge sharply: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER reaches 21 Gbps effective, while the H20 reaches 5.3 Gbps effective. This discrepancy stems from the memory technologies each card employs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The H20 uses 96 GB of HBM3 on a 6144-bit bus, delivering 4.03 TB/s of bandwidth. The H20's memory bandwidth is roughly six times higher, and its capacity is six times larger.

Compute resources show contrasting priorities. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8,448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It includes 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores. The H20 has 9,984 shading units, 312 texture mapping units, and only 24 raster output units. Its tensor core count stands at 312, but the database lists no ray tracing core count for the H20. The pixel rate reflects this difference: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER achieves 250.6 GPixel/s, while the H20 reaches 47.52 GPixel/s. Texture rates are closer, at 689.0 GTexel/s for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER versus 617.8 GTexel/s for the H20.

Floating-point throughput reveals the H20's compute orientation. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 44.10 TFLOPS for FP32 and 44.10 TFLOPS for FP16, a 1:1 ratio. The H20 delivers 39.54 TFLOPS for FP32 but 79.07 TFLOPS for FP16, a 2:1 ratio. The H20's FP16 throughput is nearly double its FP32, indicating a design tuned for workloads that leverage mixed-precision math, common in AI training and inference. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's even FP32/FP16 split suggests a more balanced general-purpose and graphics-oriented design.

Power and physical configuration differ substantially. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W, requires a suggested 600 W power supply, uses a single 16-pin connector, and occupies a triple-slot width. It is a PCIe 4.0 x16 card. The H20 has a TDP of 500 W, a suggested 900 W power supply, and uses an SXM module form factor. Its bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16. The H20 has no display outputs, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER includes 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The H20 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, confirming it is not designed for graphics rendering APIs.

Production status and release timing also differ. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is marked end-of-life and was released on 2024-01-23, with a predecessor in GeForce 30 and a successor in GeForce 50. The H20 is active, released on 2024-01-31, with a predecessor in Server Ada and a successor in Server Blackwell.

FAQ

Q: Why does the H20 have no benchmark scores in the database?

A: The database lists no benchmark entries for the NVIDIA H20. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and its nearest rivals field is empty. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, has ten individual benchmark scores, an average score of 31,087, and four nearest rivals. The absence of H20 data prevents direct performance comparison.

Q: Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The H20 delivers 4.03 TB/s of bandwidth, compared to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 672.3 GB/s. The H20's advantage comes from its 96 GB of HBM3 memory on a 6144-bit bus, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the difference in FP16 compute performance?

A: The H20 achieves 79.07 TFLOPS for FP16, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER achieves 44.10 TFLOPS. The H20's FP16 output is 2:1 relative to its FP32, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER operates at a 1:1 ratio. This indicates the H20 is optimized for mixed-precision workloads.

Q: Do both GPUs support display outputs?

A: No. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER includes 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The H20 lists no display outputs at all. The H20 also has N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How do their physical sizes compare?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER measures 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, occupying a triple-slot width. The H20 is an SXM module with no recorded dimensions in the database. The H20's die size is 814 mm² versus 379 mm² for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W and a suggested power supply of 600 W, using a single 16-pin connector. The H20 has a TDP of 500 W and a suggested power supply of 900 W, with no power connector listed because it uses an SXM module format.

The Verdict

The data separates these two GPUs into distinct functional categories. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a graphics-oriented card with a 76th percentile standing among all GPUs, an average benchmark score of 31,087, and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It delivers 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 and 44.10 TFLOPS FP16, has 66 ray tracing cores, and includes display outputs. Its release date of 2024-01-23 and end-of-life production status indicate it is a consumer and workstation product from the GeForce 40-series.

The H20 is a server accelerator with no benchmark scores in the database and no display outputs. Its 79.07 TFLOPS FP16 throughput, 4.03 TB/s memory bandwidth, and 96 GB HBM3 capacity align it with data-center compute workloads. Its 500 W TDP, SXM module form factor, and PCIe 5.0 interface further confirm its server orientation. The H20's active production status and release date of 2024-01-31 place it in the Server Hopper generation.

For users requiring graphics rendering, ray tracing, or API support, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only viable option between the two, as the H20 lacks display output and graphics API compatibility. For users prioritizing FP16 compute throughput, memory capacity, or memory bandwidth, the H20 shows clear advantages in the recorded specifications. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's nearest rivals, all within 1.9 percent of its average score, demonstrate its competitive position among graphics cards, but the H20's lack of benchmark data leaves its measured performance unquantified in the database.

Specification Differences

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and H20 differ across nearly every recorded specification field, reflecting their divergent design goals.

• Chip and Architecture: AD103 on Ada Lovelace versus GH100 on Hopper
• Generation: GeForce 40 versus Server Hopper (Hxx)
• Transistors: 45,900 million versus 80,000 million
• Die Size: 379 mm² versus 814 mm²
• Transistor Density: 121.1M / mm² versus 98.3M / mm²
• Base Clock: 2340 MHz versus 1830 MHz
• Boost Clock: 2610 MHz versus 1980 MHz
• Memory Clock: 1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective versus 1313 MHz 5.3 Gbps effective
• Memory Size: 16 GB versus 96 GB
• Memory Type: GDDR6X versus HBM3
• Memory Bus Width: 256 bit versus 6144 bit
• Memory Bandwidth: 672.3 GB/s versus 4.03 TB/s
• Shading Units: 8,448 versus 9,984
• TMUs: 264 versus 312
• ROPs: 96 versus 24
• RT Cores: 66 versus null
• Tensor Cores: 264 versus 312
• Pixel Rate: 250.6 GPixel/s versus 47.52 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 689.0 GTexel/s versus 617.8 GTexel/s
• FP32: 44.10 TFLOPS versus 39.54 TFLOPS
• FP16: 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 79.07 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 285 W versus 500 W
• Slot Width: Triple-slot versus SXM Module
• Power Connectors: 1x 16-pin versus null
• Suggested PSU: 600 W versus 900 W
• Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x16 versus PCIe 5.0 x16
• Display Outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a versus No outputs
• APIs: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4 versus N/A for all
• Dimensions: 310 mm x 140 mm x 61 mm versus null
• Production Status: End-of-life versus Active
• Release Date: 2024-01-23 versus 2024-01-31
• Predecessor: GeForce 30 versus Server Ada
• Successor: GeForce 50 versus Server Blackwell

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins on graphics-centric specifications. Its pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s is more than five times the H20's 47.52 GPixel/s. Its 96 ROPs dwarf the H20's 24 ROPs. It has 66 ray tracing cores, while the H20 has none recorded. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the H20 lists N/A for all three. It provides display outputs, which the H20 lacks entirely. Its FP32 throughput of 44.10 TFLOPS exceeds the H20's 39.54 TFLOPS. Its base and boost clocks are higher at 2340 MHz and 2610 MHz versus 1830 MHz and 1980 MHz. Its transistor density is higher at 121.1M per mm² versus 98.3M per mm², and its TDP is lower at 285 W versus 500 W.

The H20 wins on compute and memory capacity specifications. Its FP16 throughput of 79.07 TFLOPS is nearly double the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 44.10 TFLOPS. Its memory bandwidth of 4.03 TB/s is roughly six times the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 672.3 GB/s. Its memory capacity of 96 GB is six times the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 16 GB. Its 9,984 shading units and 312 tensor cores exceed the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 8,448 and 264, respectively. Its 312 TMUs compare favorably to 264. Its die size of 814 mm² and transistor count of 80,000 million are substantially larger than the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 379 mm² and 45,900 million. Its PCIe 5.0 interface is newer than PCIe 4.0.

For graphics rendering and rasterization, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds clear advantages in pixel throughput, ROP count, ray tracing support, and API compatibility. For compute-heavy workloads such as FP16 math and large memory footprints, the H20 leads decisively in the recorded specifications. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's benchmark average of 31,087 and 76th percentile rank provide measurable context for its graphics performance, while the H20's lack of benchmark data means its compute advantages are defined by specifications rather than recorded test results.