NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a striking contrast between these two NVIDIA offerings. The only direct head-to-head test available is Geekbench Vulkan, and the results are decisively one-sided. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 53,683, while the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q manages 31,220. That translates to a 41.8% advantage for the newer card, a massive gap in raw compute performance under the Vulkan API.

Looking at the broader benchmark picture, the GRID M60-1Q's average benchmark score is 31,220, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER averages 31,087. These averages are nearly identical, differing by just 0.4%, yet the Vulkan scores tell a very different story. The discrepancy suggests that the GRID M60-1Q's single Vulkan result is its only data point, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has multiple benchmark results pulling its average down, including some older DirectX tests where it scores relatively low (Passmark DirectX 9 at 360, DirectX 10 at 181, DirectX 11 at 278, DirectX 12 at 119). These legacy API scores drag the 4070 Ti SUPER's overall average down despite its enormous Vulkan superiority.

In the nearest rival comparisons, the GRID M60-1Q sits within 1.4% of the NVIDIA TITAN RTX (31,676) and within 1% of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (31,532). The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, meanwhile, trails the TITAN RTX by 1.9% and the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell by 1.4% in average score. This places both cards in the same performance tier according to average scores, even though their individual benchmark profiles diverge sharply.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER demonstrates its strength across multiple modern benchmarks. In Geekbench OpenCL, it achieves 199,267, a figure that dwarfs its own Vulkan score. Its Passmark G3D score of 31,811 and Passmark GPU Compute score of 18,372 further establish it as a well-rounded performer across different rendering and compute workloads.

The GRID M60-1Q has no such breadth of testing data. Its single Vulkan score places it at the 76th percentile among all GPUs, identical to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's percentile ranking. Both cards occupy the same percentile position, which is remarkable given the 41.8% Vulkan gap, but this is a function of the limited data available for the GRID card.

The Verdict

The data points to one clear conclusion: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the superior graphics card for virtually any workload that leverages modern APIs. Its Vulkan score of 53,683 versus the GRID M60-1Q's 31,220 represents a 41.8% performance advantage. That is not a marginal difference; it is a generational leap.

The GRID M60-1Q, released in 2015, is an end-of-life product built on Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, released in 2024, uses Ada Lovelace architecture. The architectural gap manifests directly in benchmark performance. If you are building a system for gaming, content creation, or any GPU-accelerated workload using DirectX 12 Ultimate or modern Vulkan, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only rational choice from this data.

However, the GRID M60-1Q is not without a niche. Its average score of 31,220 is statistically tied with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 31,087, and it matches the newer card's 76th percentile ranking. In legacy API scenarios, the GRID card may hold its own, though no direct legacy comparisons exist in this data. More importantly, the GRID M60-1Q has no display outputs, making it unsuitable for standard desktop use. It is a compute-focused or virtualized-environment card. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, with its 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, is a conventional desktop GPU.

For most buyers, the verdict is straightforward: choose the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The 41.8% Vulkan lead, combined with its comprehensive feature set and modern architecture, makes it the superior hardware. The GRID M60-1Q only makes sense if you specifically need a no-output card for server or virtualized deployments, and even then, its 2015 vintage and 1 GB memory capacity are severe limitations.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher Geekbench Vulkan score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 53,683, which is 41.8% higher than the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q's 31,220.

Q: Are these cards in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both the GRID M60-1Q and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER rank at the 76th percentile among all GPUs, despite their divergent Vulkan results.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The GRID M60-1Q averages 31,220, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER averages 31,087, a difference of only 0.4% in favor of the GRID card.

Q: What memory configurations do these cards have?

A: The GRID M60-1Q has 1 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus with 160.4 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the GRID M60-1Q support display outputs?

A: No, the GRID M60-1Q has no display outputs, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Q: What is the release date difference between these two?

A: The GRID M60-1Q was released in 2015, and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER was released in 2024.

Specification Differences

The specifications reveal a generational chasm. The GRID M60-1Q uses 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER employs 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. That is a 4.1x increase in shading units, a 2.1x increase in TMUs, and a 1.5x increase in ROPs.

Clock speeds differ dramatically as well. The GRID M60-1Q has a base clock of 557 MHz and a boost clock of 1,178 MHz. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER operates at a 2,340 MHz base and 2,610 MHz boost. Memory clocks are similarly divergent: 1,253 MHz (5 Gbps effective) for the GRID versus 1,313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) for the RTX card.

Memory capacity is a stark differentiator. The GRID M60-1Q offers just 1,024 MB of GDDR5, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER provides 16 GB of GDDR6X. Both use a 256-bit memory bus, but bandwidth tells the real story: 160.4 GB/s versus 672.3 GB/s, a 4.2x advantage for the newer card.

Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern. The GRID M60-1Q delivers 75.39 GPixel/s and 150.8 GTexel/s. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER achieves 250.6 GPixel/s and 689.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is even more lopsided: 4.825 TFLOPS FP32 for the GRID versus 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 for the RTX card, a 9.1x difference.

Power and physical specifications also differ. The GRID M60-1Q has a 225 W TDP with a 1x 8-pin connector and a suggested 550 W PSU. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 285 W TDP with a 1x 16-pin connector and a suggested 600 W PSU. The GRID is a dual-slot card at 267 mm length; the RTX is a triple-slot card at 310 mm length, 140 mm height, and 61 mm width. The GRID uses PCIe 3.0 x16, while the RTX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. DirectX support differs too: 12 (12_1) for the GRID versus 12 Ultimate (12_2) for the RTX.

Architecture Differences

The GRID M60-1Q is built on the GM204 chip using Maxwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 28 nm process at TSMC. It contains 5,200 million transistors on a 398 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 13.1 million per mm². The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, achieving a density of 121.1 million per mm².

The transistor density difference is enormous: the RTX card packs 9.2x more transistors per square millimeter. Despite having a smaller die (379 mm² versus 398 mm²), the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER contains nearly 9x more total transistors. This density improvement is the physical foundation for its performance advantage.

Feature-wise, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER includes 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores, neither of which exist on the GRID M60-1Q. The RTX card also supports FP16 compute at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, delivering 44.10 TFLOPS in both precisions. The GRID M60-1Q has no listed FP16 capability.

The GRID generation is labeled "GRID (Mx)" while the RTX is from the "GeForce 40" generation. The RTX card's predecessor is listed as GeForce 30 and its successor as GeForce 50. The GRID M60-1Q has no predecessor or successor listed. Both cards support DirectX (12_1 versus 12 Ultimate), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but the RTX card's DirectX 12 Ultimate support is a newer feature tier.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins decisively in the only direct benchmark comparison available. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 53,683 versus 31,220 for the GRID M60-1Q represents a 41.8% victory. This is the headline result and should guide any purchasing decision.

Beyond the head-to-head, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins in every meaningful performance metric derived from the specifications. It has higher pixel rate (250.6 versus 75.39 GPixel/s), higher texture rate (689.0 versus 150.8 GTexel/s), and dramatically higher FP32 throughput (44.10 versus 4.825 TFLOPS). Its memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s quadruples the GRID's 160.4 GB/s, and its 16 GB VRAM capacity is 16x larger.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also wins in feature support. It has ray tracing cores and tensor cores, enabling modern rendering techniques and AI acceleration that the GRID M60-1Q cannot perform. Its DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with the latest games and applications, whereas the GRID's DirectX 12_1 support is a previous-generation feature level.

The GRID M60-1Q's only "win" is a statistical tie in average benchmark score (31,220 versus 31,087) and equal percentile ranking (76th). However, this is misleading: the GRID's average is based on a single Vulkan test, while the RTX card's average includes several low-scoring legacy DirectX tests. In any modern workload, the GRID has no advantage.

For use cases, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the clear winner for gaming, 3D rendering, video editing, machine learning inference, and any other GPU-accelerated task. The GRID M60-1Q, with no display outputs and only 1 GB of memory, is restricted to virtualized environments or compute tasks that do not require display connectivity. Even there, its 2015 architecture and 28 nm process make it an obsolete choice compared to the 2024 Ada Lovelace card. The data leaves no ambiguity: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins where it matters, and the GRID M60-1Q wins nowhere in this comparison.