NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains a single benchmark entry for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, with a score of 6269.5 points. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, and the head-to-head benchmark comparison list is empty. This absence of comparative data means the analysis must rely on the architectural specifications and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's percentile placement among all GPUs.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 sits at the 36th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6270. Its nearest rivals in the database show a tight cluster: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER matches its score exactly at 6270, with a delta of 0%. The AMD FirePro W600 trails by 0.8% with a score of 6223, while the NVIDIA Quadro K620 sits 0.2% higher at 6282, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads this group by 0.9% at 6327. The delta percentages indicate that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 performs in a narrow band, within roughly one percentage point of these four rivals, despite their very different market positions and architectures.

The LX PRO carries no benchmark results, no nearest rivals, and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile ranking of 50 appears in the data, but without any measured scores, this percentile cannot be substantiated by actual performance measurements. The database shows zero wins for either product in the head-to-head comparison, which is consistent with the empty benchmarks array for the LX PRO and the single test for the NVIDIA card.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 wins in raw rasterization throughput. Its FP32 compute reaches 44.10 TFLOPS, compared to 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO. This represents a substantial advantage in single-precision floating-point work, which directly impacts gaming performance and general compute tasks. The texture rate favors NVIDIA as well, with 689.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, and the pixel rate stands at 250.6 GPixel/s against 192.0 GPixel/s.

The LX PRO counters in memory capacity. It offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 provides 16 GB of GDDR6X. For workloads that require large datasets to reside in video memory, such as certain rendering scenes, machine learning inference batches, or content creation projects, the LX PRO's additional 8 GB provides a clear capacity advantage. However, the memory bandwidth tells a different story: the NVIDIA card delivers 672.3 GB/s over a 256-bit bus, while the LX PRO manages 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 moves data over 55% faster despite having less total memory.

FP16 compute presents a split decision. The LX PRO rates 49.15 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32, exceeding its own FP32 figure. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 delivers 44.10 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 1:1 ratio, meaning it does not gain any throughput advantage when switching to half-precision. In workloads that leverage FP16 heavily, the LX PRO's higher peak rate could translate to faster execution, though the NVIDIA card's tensor cores, which are not present on the LX PRO, may handle certain AI tasks through dedicated hardware.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses the AD102 chip built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The chip contains 76,300 million transistors across a 609 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip based on the TrueGPU architecture, produced by the same foundry, TSMC, but on a 6 nm process node. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

Shader resources differ significantly. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 carries 8448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The NVIDIA GPU also includes 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, while the LX PRO lists no RT cores and no tensor cores in the available data. These missing entries suggest the LX PRO lacks dedicated ray tracing and tensor processing hardware, or that such details were not recorded.

Memory technology separates the two as well. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses GDDR6X memory running at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective data rate, while the LX PRO uses GDDR6 at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The NVIDIA card's memory clock is lower in raw terms, but its wider 256-bit bus and GDDR6X technology produce higher overall bandwidth. The LX PRO's 192-bit bus limits its bandwidth ceiling despite the higher memory clock.

Clock specifications for the NVIDIA GPU are recorded at 2340 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock figures in the database. Power consumption also differs: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a TDP of 285 W with a suggested 600 W PSU, while the LX PRO draws 225 W and recommends a 550 W PSU. The physical dimensions reflect these power and cooling requirements: the NVIDIA card measures 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, occupying a triple-slot design. The LX PRO is more compact at 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm, using a dual-slot configuration. Both use a single 16-pin power connector and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The release timeline shows the NVIDIA card launched on June 9, 2024, and is marked as end-of-life, with predecessors in the GeForce 30 series and successors in the GeForce 50 series. The LX PRO was released on March 16, 2026, and remains active in production, with no predecessor or successor recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 delivers 44.10 TFLOPS in FP32, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO provides 24.58 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card offers roughly 79% more single-precision throughput.

Q: Does the LX PRO support ray tracing?

A: The database lists no RT cores for the LX PRO, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 includes 66 RT cores. The LX PRO's architecture does not show dedicated ray tracing hardware in the recorded specifications.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 reaches 672.3 GB/s using GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus. The LX PRO achieves 432.0 GB/s with GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The NVIDIA card provides higher bandwidth, while the LX PRO offers greater total capacity at 24 GB versus 16 GB.

Q: What API support do both cards share?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 contains 8448 shading units and 264 TMUs. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units and 192 TMUs. Both GPUs feature 96 ROPs.

Q: What are the physical size differences?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 measures 310 mm by 140 mm by 61 mm and occupies a triple-slot form factor. The LX PRO is smaller at 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm in a dual-slot design.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------|

| Chip | AD102 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TrueGPU |

| Generation | GeForce 40 | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 76,300 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 609 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 125.3M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 2340 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 672.3 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 8448 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 264 | 192 |

| RT Cores | 66 | null |

| Tensor Cores | 264 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 250.6 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 689.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 44.10 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 285 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |

| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 550 W |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | 310 mm x 140 mm x 61 mm | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2024-06-09 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 799 USD | null |

The Verdict

The data indicates the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 holds clear advantages in compute throughput, texture and pixel rates, memory bandwidth, and API version support. Its 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 output, 689.0 GTexel/s texture rate, and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth position it as the stronger choice for rasterization-heavy workloads and high-resolution gaming. The presence of 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores gives it dedicated hardware capabilities that the LX PRO lacks entirely, based on the recorded data.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO offers a different set of strengths. Its 24 GB memory capacity exceeds the NVIDIA card's 16 GB by 50%, which benefits workloads that require large in-memory datasets. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS surpasses the NVIDIA card's 44.10 TFLOPS, potentially giving it an edge in half-precision compute tasks. The LX PRO also operates at a lower 225 W TDP and fits in a smaller dual-slot form factor, which may suit constrained chassis or power delivery scenarios.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's benchmark score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad places it within 0.9% of its nearest rivals, confirming consistent performance in its class. The LX PRO has no measured scores, so its actual performance remains unverified in the database. The NVIDIA card's end-of-life status contrasts with the LX PRO's active production, suggesting the LX PRO represents a newer product generation with ongoing availability.

Users who prioritize maximum compute throughput, ray tracing, tensor acceleration, and memory bandwidth should consider the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102. Users who need larger memory capacity, higher FP16 throughput, lower power draw, and a more compact physical footprint should evaluate the LX PRO. The absence of benchmark data for the LX PRO means its real-world performance cannot be confirmed from the database, leaving its theoretical specifications as the only basis for comparison.