NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Comparison

# NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 represent two vastly different eras of GPU design, separated by architecture, process technology, and intended workload. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, built on Ada Lovelace at 5 nm, delivers 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 performance, while the Quadro P2000, a Pascal-generation part from 2017, offers 3.031 TFLOPS FP32. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy, with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 holding a 36th percentile ranking among all GPUs versus the Quadro P2000's 35th percentile — a narrow percentile gap that belies the massive raw performance difference. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's average benchmark score of 6270 places it nearly on par with its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER (0% delta), while the Quadro P2000's 6049 average sits close to the NVIDIA GeForce MX230 (-0.5% delta).

The Verdict

For any workload involving modern DirectX 12 Ultimate titles, ray tracing, or compute-heavy tasks, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is the only viable choice. Its 8448 shading units, 264 tensor cores, and 66 RT cores provide hardware support for features the Quadro P2000 simply lacks — the older card has no RT or tensor cores at all. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 also doubles as a future-proofing investment with its 16 GB GDDR6X memory and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth, compared to the Quadro P2000's 5 GB GDDR5 at 140.2 GB/s. However, the Quadro P2000 retains a niche for legacy DirectX 9 and DirectX 10 applications, where its Passmark scores (124 and 34, respectively) show it can still function, albeit at low performance levels.

The Quadro P2000 makes sense only for users constrained by physical space or power delivery. Its single-slot design, 75 W TDP, and lack of external power connectors allow installation in compact workstations where the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's triple-slot footprint and 285 W TDP would be prohibitive. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, with its 1x 16-pin connector and 600 W suggested PSU, targets enthusiasts building high-end systems. Benchmark results indicate the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is the clear winner for any modern use case, but the Quadro P2000's low power envelope and small footprint give it a specific, if narrow, deployment scenario.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs share a manufacturer but diverge completely in design philosophy. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses the AD102 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 76,300 million transistors into a 609 mm² die — a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The Quadro P2000's GP106 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 16 nm node, contains just 4,400 million transistors across a 200 mm² die, yielding a density of 22.0M per mm². This represents a 5.7x increase in transistor density between generations. The Ada Lovelace architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Pascal-based Quadro P2000 maxes out at DirectX 12 (12_1). Both cards support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is not a differentiator for older workloads.

Clock speeds and memory subsystems highlight the generational gap. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 operates at a 2340 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The Quadro P2000 runs at 1076 MHz base and 1480 MHz boost, with memory at 1752 MHz (7 Gbps effective). Memory configurations differ starkly: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses a 256-bit bus with 16 GB GDDR6X, while the Quadro P2000 uses a 160-bit bus with 5 GB GDDR5. This results in bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s versus 140.2 GB/s — a 4.8x advantage for the newer card. Pixel rate and texture rate follow suit: 250.6 GPixel/s and 689.0 GTexel/s for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, versus 59.20 GPixel/s and 94.72 GTexel/s for the Quadro P2000.

Feature support marks the most critical architectural split. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 includes 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. The Quadro P2000 has neither, relying purely on its 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 40 ROPs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's 8448 shading units and 264 TMUs dwarf the older card's resources. FP16 performance is particularly lopsided: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 delivers 44.10 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, while the Quadro P2000 manages only 47.36 GFLOPS at a 1:64 ratio — a 931x difference that makes the Quadro P2000 effectively useless for modern half-precision compute.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 wins decisively in every modern benchmark category. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5 demonstrates strong DirectX 12 performance, a workload where the Quadro P2000 has no comparable result in the data. The newer card's 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput positions it for compute-heavy tasks like scientific simulation or AI inference, especially with tensor core acceleration. For content creation, the 16 GB GDDR6X frame buffer and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth allow large textures and high-resolution rendering without memory pressure. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 also wins on display connectivity, offering 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, versus the Quadro P2000's 4x DisplayPort 1.4a — both support modern displays, but the HDMI 2.1 port adds TV connectivity.

The Quadro P2000's wins are limited to legacy software and physical constraints. Its Passmark DirectX 9 score of 124 and DirectX 10 score of 34 show that it can run older applications, though at low performance levels. The single-slot, 75 W design with no power connectors is a genuine advantage for small form factor systems or servers where space and power are at a premium. The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, while older, remains compatible with virtually all motherboards. For pure 2D desktop workloads, the Passmark G2D score of 626 indicates basic adequacy, though the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 would likely outperform it given the massive difference in raw throughput. The Quadro P2000's 5 GB memory, while small, is sufficient for legacy CAD or office applications that do not demand modern graphics features.

FAQ

Q: Which card is faster in raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 delivers 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 versus 3.031 TFLOPS for the Quadro P2000 — a 14.5x advantage. In FP16, the gap is even larger: 44.10 TFLOPS versus 47.36 GFLOPS, a 931x difference.

Q: Can the Quadro P2000 handle ray tracing?

A: No. The Quadro P2000 has no RT cores, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 includes 66 RT cores. This makes the newer card the only option for hardware-accelerated ray tracing workloads.

Q: How do their memory configurations compare?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has 16 GB GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth. The Quadro P2000 has 5 GB GDDR5 on a 160-bit bus with 140.2 GB/s bandwidth. The newer card offers 3.2x more capacity and 4.8x more bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has a 285 W TDP, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and needs a 600 W suggested PSU. The Quadro P2000 has a 75 W TDP, requires no external power connectors, and works with a 250 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which card supports newer DirectX features?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Quadro P2000 only supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both cards support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How do their physical dimensions affect installation?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. The Quadro P2000 is a single-slot card at 196 mm long and 111 mm tall, making it far easier to fit in compact or densely populated systems.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data contains no direct comparisons between these two cards, so the analysis must rely on their respective standalone benchmark results and nearest rival comparisons. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's only listed benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, returns a score of 6269.5. This places it at the 36th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6270. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, scores an identical 6270 with a 0% delta, indicating that the AD102-based card performs at the level of a current-generation mid-range part. The AMD FirePro W600 trails by 0.8% with a score of 6223, while the NVIDIA Quadro K620 leads by 0.2% at 6282, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads by 0.9% at 6327 — these deltas are within noise, suggesting the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 sits in a tightly competitive performance band.

The Quadro P2000's benchmark suite spans multiple legacy and compute tests. Its Passmark G3D score of 6956 is the strongest traditional graphics result, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 23566 and OpenCL score of 20125 indicate reasonable compute capability for its era. However, the Passmark DirectX scores paint a different picture: DirectX 9 at 124, DirectX 10 at 34, DirectX 11 at 47, and DirectX 12 at 28. These low numbers reflect the card's age and lack of modern feature support. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 2933 is similarly modest. The Quadro P2000's 35th percentile ranking and 6049 average score place it near the NVIDIA GeForce MX230 (6077, -0.5% delta), NVIDIA RTX A400 (6078, -0.5%), AMD Radeon 760M (6019, +0.5%), and AMD Radeon RX 6400 (6001, +0.8%). This clustering shows the Quadro P2000 performs at entry-level levels today, despite its professional branding.

Comparing the two cards through their average scores — 6270 versus 6049 — shows only a 3.7% difference in aggregate, but this is misleading. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's single benchmark is a modern DX12 test that stresses current-generation features, while the Quadro P2000's scores come from legacy APIs and compute workloads where the Pascal architecture can still function. The absence of any shared benchmark between the two cards means no direct apples-to-apples comparison exists in the data, but the architectural specifications — 44.10 versus 3.031 TFLOPS FP32, 672.3 versus 140.2 GB/s bandwidth, and 16 GB versus 5 GB memory — provide overwhelming evidence of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's dominance. For any user choosing between these two, the data clearly favors the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 unless power, space, or legacy software compatibility are overriding concerns.