NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison case. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has a full set of ten benchmark scores across 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark suites. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database at all. This means a direct score-for-score comparison is impossible. What the data does show is that the RTX 4070 SUPER holds an average benchmark score of 43223 across all tests, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. The LX PRO carries a 50th percentile ranking, but with an average score of zero, this percentile reflects the absence of measured data rather than actual performance.

The RTX 4070 SUPER's individual results provide context for its overall standing. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 4627. Geekbench OpenCL returns 172795, while Vulkan scores 205624. Passmark results range from 110 in DirectX 12 to 344 in DirectX 9, with the G3D score at 29995 and GPU compute at 17108. These numbers position the card firmly in the upper tier of the database's rankings. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB with an average score of 43262, a delta of -0.1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile at 43268, also -0.1%. The RTX 4090 Mobile sits at 43667, a -1% delta, while the Quadro M6000 scores 43301, a -0.2% difference. The RTX 4070 SUPER trails each of these by less than one percent in average score, indicating near-parity performance with those mobile and workstation parts.

The LX PRO cannot be evaluated through benchmark deltas because no head-to-head tests exist in the database. Wins for each card are recorded as zero. Any comparison must therefore rely on specification data, architectural details, and the known performance envelope of the RTX 4070 SUPER. The LX PRO's lack of recorded scores means its actual performance remains unquantified in this database.

Where Each One Wins

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, the measurable wins are clear across every benchmark category where data exists. Its highest relative strength appears in compute-oriented workloads. The Passmark GPU compute score of 17108, combined with the Geekbench OpenCL score of 172795, indicates strong general-purpose compute capability. The Vulkan score of 205624 suggests solid API-level performance for modern graphics workloads. In legacy DirectX tests, the card shows a spread from 110 in DX12 to 344 in DX9, with DX11 at 273 and DX10 at 167. These figures reflect a card optimized for current-generation APIs rather than older pipelines.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in memory capacity. It carries 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, double the 12 GB of the RTX 4070 SUPER. For workloads that require large working sets, such as certain rendering or compute tasks, the LX PRO offers double the capacity. However, the RTX 4070 SUPER counters with higher bandwidth: 504.2 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s for the LX PRO. The NVIDIA card also uses faster GDDR6X memory operating at 21 Gbps effective, while the LX PRO uses GDDR6 at 18 Gbps effective. Both cards share a 192-bit memory bus.

In raw compute throughput, the RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO. The LX PRO does offer higher FP16 throughput at 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 4070 SUPER achieves 35.48 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. For mixed-precision workloads, the LX PRO's FP16 advantage could matter. The RTX 4070 SUPER also leads in texture rate at 554.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, while pixel rates are close: 198.0 GPixel/s for NVIDIA and 192.0 GPixel/s for Lisuan Tech. The RTX 4070 SUPER has more shading units at 7168 versus 6144, and more TMUs at 224 versus 192, but the LX PRO has more ROPs at 96 versus 80.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43223, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores, giving it an average score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB with an average score of 43262, a delta of -0.1%. The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, also -0.1%, while the RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667, a -1% delta. The Quadro M6000 scores 43301, a -0.2% delta. All four rivals are within one percent of the RTX 4070 SUPER.

Q: What memory configuration does each card use?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth and 21 Gbps effective speed. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Which card has higher compute throughput?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 4070 SUPER achieves 35.48 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 1:1 ratio.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER is marked as end-of-life, released on January 16, 2024, with a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The LX PRO is listed as active, with a release date of March 16, 2026, and no launch MSRP recorded.

Q: Do both cards support the same APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4070 SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 4070 SUPER includes ray tracing and tensor cores, while the LX PRO lists no RT or tensor core counts.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every measurable specification. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with unknown transistor count and die size, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Transistor density for the RTX 4070 SUPER is 121.8M per mm²; the LX PRO has no recorded density.

Clock speeds show a major divergence. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a base clock of 1980 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory clocks differ: 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective for NVIDIA, 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for Lisuan Tech.

Compute resources favor the RTX 4070 SUPER in shading units, TMUs, and tensor cores. It has 7168 shading units, 224 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 56 RT cores, and 224 tensor cores. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no recorded RT or tensor core counts. Pixel rates are nearly identical at 198.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, but texture rates differ substantially at 554.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Power and physical specifications are similar. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. TDP is 220 W for the RTX 4070 SUPER and 225 W for the LX PRO. Dimensions differ slightly: the RTX 4070 SUPER is 267 mm long, 112 mm tall, and 42 mm wide. The LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. Display outputs differ: the RTX 4070 SUPER has one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the LX PRO has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs with no HDMI.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 4070 SUPER is built on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, part of the GeForce 40 generation. It uses a 5 nm process at TSMC and includes dedicated RT cores and tensor cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its FP16 performance matches FP32 at 35.48 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The architecture is a refinement of the previous GeForce 30 generation, with the GeForce 50 series listed as its successor.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, one step behind the RTX 4070 SUPER's 5 nm node. The LX PRO has no recorded RT cores or tensor cores, suggesting it lacks dedicated hardware for ray tracing and tensor operations. Its FP16 performance is double its FP32 at 49.15 TFLOPS, indicating a 2:1 ratio, which differs from the RTX 4070 SUPER's 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6 but only Vulkan 1.3, one version behind the RTX 4070 SUPER's Vulkan 1.4.

The RTX 4070 SUPER's transistor count of 35,800 million on a 294 mm² die gives it a density of 121.8M per mm². The LX PRO has no recorded transistor data. The RTX 4070 SUPER includes 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores, hardware that the LX PRO does not list. The memory architecture also differs: GDDR6X for NVIDIA versus GDDR6 for Lisuan Tech, with the former providing higher bandwidth despite smaller capacity.

The Verdict

The data supports choosing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER for any workload where measured performance matters. Its average benchmark score of 43223 places it in the 83rd percentile, and its nearest rivals in the database are all within one percent, including the RTX 4090 Mobile and Quadro M6000 variants. The card delivers 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and includes dedicated RT and tensor cores. Its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory is sufficient for most current applications, and its Vulkan 1.4 support is the newer API version.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a different proposition. It offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, double the capacity of the RTX 4070 SUPER, and higher FP16 throughput at 49.15 TFLOPS. Its 96 ROPs exceed the RTX 4070 SUPER's 80, which could benefit pixel-heavy workloads. However, the absence of any recorded benchmark scores means the database contains no evidence of its real-world performance. Its 50th percentile ranking, tied to a zero average score, reflects missing data rather than measured capability. The LX PRO also lacks RT and tensor cores, has lower FP32 throughput at 24.58 TFLOPS, and supports an older Vulkan version.

For builders seeking a card with verified performance, the RTX 4070 SUPER is the only option with recorded data. Its end-of-life status and launch MSRP of 599 USD provide context, but the LX PRO has no launch MSRP recorded. The LX PRO's active production status and 2026 release date suggest it is a current product, yet without benchmark results, its performance class remains unknown. The RTX 4070 SUPER's measured results, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4627 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 205624, give it a clear edge in every tested category. The LX PRO's larger memory pool and FP16 capability are the only areas where its specifications exceed the NVIDIA card, but those advantages are not backed by any recorded performance data in this database.