NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB Comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER are separated by nearly a decade of GPU architecture, yet their average benchmark scores place them within 0.1% of each other. The data reveals a fascinating generational clash where the older professional card relies on sheer memory capacity and a wide bus, while the newer consumer card dominates in raw compute and modern API performance. The benchmark results show a clear victor in synthetic tests, but the specification sheet tells a more nuanced story about intended workloads and system requirements.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct comparison in the FACT PACK is limited to two synthetic tests, and the RTX 4070 SUPER wins both decisively. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4070 SUPER scores 172,795 against the Quadro M6000 24 GB’s 40,098, representing a 76.8% advantage for the newer card. This is a massive margin that reflects the fundamental compute throughput difference between the two architectures, with the RTX 4070 SUPER delivering over five times the raw score.

The Vulkan test tells a similar story. The RTX 4070 SUPER posts 205,624, while the Quadro M6000 24 GB manages 46,425. The deltaPct here is -77.4%, meaning the Quadro trails by nearly four-fifths. Vulkan is a modern low-overhead API, and the Maxwell architecture’s implementation simply cannot match the Ada Lovelace hardware designed for contemporary graphics workloads. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s advantage is even more pronounced in Vulkan than in OpenCL, suggesting its driver and hardware are better optimized for this newer API standard.

Despite these lopsided head-to-head results, the aggregate picture is surprisingly close. The Quadro M6000 24 GB’s average benchmark score is 43,262, while the RTX 4070 SUPER’s is 43,223. The deltaPct between them in their respective nearest-rival lists is just 0.1% either way. This means that when averaged across all benchmark suites, the two cards land within 39 points of each other. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s enormous wins in Geekbench are likely offset by other tests where the Quadro’s 24 GB memory buffer and higher memory bandwidth provide an edge, though those specific tests are not included in this data set.

The wins tally is unambiguous: the RTX 4070 SUPER takes 2 out of 2 head-to-head benchmarks. The Quadro M6000 24 GB wins zero. However, the percentile ranking for both cards is identical at 83, meaning both sit at the same position relative to all other GPUs in the database. This suggests that while the RTX 4070 SUPER dominates in these particular tests, the overall performance class of both cards is considered similar by the benchmark database’s aggregate metrics.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is vast. The Quadro M6000 24 GB uses the GM200 chip built on Maxwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 28 nm process at TSMC. It packs 8,000 million transistors into a 601 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 13.3 million per square millimeter. The RTX 4070 SUPER, by contrast, uses the AD104 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process, also from TSMC. It crams 35,800 million transistors into a much smaller 294 mm² die, achieving a density of 121.8 million per square millimeter — more than nine times the density of the older chip.

The chip layout reflects the different design goals. The Quadro M6000 24 GB has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines. The RTX 4070 SUPER more than doubles the shading units to 7,168, increases TMUs to 224, but reduces ROPs to 80. The newer card also includes dedicated hardware that the Quadro completely lacks: 56 ray tracing cores and 224 tensor cores. These are essential for modern gaming features like DLSS and real-time ray tracing, which the Maxwell architecture cannot accelerate at all.

Clock speeds tell a similar story of generational improvement. The Quadro M6000 24 GB runs at a base clock of 988 MHz with a boost of 1114 MHz. The RTX 4070 SUPER starts at 1980 MHz and boosts to 2475 MHz — more than double the base clock and over 2.2 times the boost clock of the older card. This clock advantage, combined with the higher shader count, explains the massive FP32 throughput difference: the Quadro delivers 6.844 TFLOPS, while the RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 35.48 TFLOPS, a 5.2x improvement. The RTX 4070 SUPER also offers FP16 performance at 35.48 TFLOPS (1:1), while the Quadro lists no FP16 capability.

Memory architecture diverges sharply as well. The Quadro M6000 24 GB uses 24 GB of GDDR5 on a 384-bit bus, providing 317.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, but achieves 504.2 GB/s due to much faster memory clocks. The Quadro’s memory runs at 1653 MHz (6.6 Gbps effective), while the RTX 4070 SUPER’s runs at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The newer card’s smaller bus is more than compensated by the higher data rate per pin.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory, and does it matter?

A: The Quadro M6000 24 GB has exactly double the memory of the RTX 4070 SUPER (24 GB vs 12 GB). The Quadro uses GDDR5 on a 384-bit bus, while the RTX 4070 SUPER uses GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus. The RTX 4070 SUPER still achieves higher memory bandwidth (504.2 GB/s vs 317.4 GB/s), so the Quadro’s capacity advantage does not translate to a speed advantage.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare between the two cards?

A: They are nearly identical. The Quadro M6000 24 GB has an average benchmark score of 43,262, and the RTX 4070 SUPER scores 43,223. In the nearest-rivals data, the deltaPct between them is just 0.1% in favor of the Quadro and -0.1% when viewed from the RTX 4070 SUPER’s perspective.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 SUPER support ray tracing?

A: Yes. The RTX 4070 SUPER includes 56 ray tracing cores and 224 tensor cores. The Quadro M6000 24 GB has no ray tracing or tensor cores listed in its specifications, indicating it lacks dedicated hardware for these features.

Q: What is the transistor density difference between the two chips?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER’s AD104 chip has a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm², while the Quadro M6000 24 GB’s GM200 chip has 13.3 million per mm². This is a 9.2x difference in density, resulting from the process node shrink from 28 nm to 5 nm.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has a boost clock of 2475 MHz, which is more than double the Quadro M6000 24 GB’s boost clock of 1114 MHz. The base clocks are 1980 MHz and 988 MHz, respectively.

Q: Are both cards considered end-of-life?

A: Yes, both the Quadro M6000 24 GB and the RTX 4070 SUPER have a production status of "End-of-life" in the FACT PACK data.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |

| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 8,000 million | 35,800 million |

| Die Size | 601 mm² | 294 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 13.3M / mm² | 121.8M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 988 MHz | 1980 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 2475 MHz |

| Memory Size | 24 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |

| Memory Bus Width | 384 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 317.4 GB/s | 504.2 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 3072 | 7168 |

| TMUs | 192 | 224 |

| ROPs | 96 | 80 |

| RT Cores | None | 56 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 224 |

| Pixel Rate | 106.9 GPixel/s | 198.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 213.9 GTexel/s | 554.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 6.844 TFLOPS | 35.48 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | Not listed | 35.48 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 250 W | 220 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort 1.2 | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX Support | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Release Date | 2016-03-04 | 2024-01-16 |

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous about raw compute: the RTX 4070 SUPER is the faster card. It wins both available head-to-head benchmarks by margins of 76.8% and 77.4%, delivers over five times the FP32 throughput (35.48 TFLOPS vs 6.844 TFLOPS), and has more than double the shading units (7,168 vs 3,072). The RTX 4070 SUPER also brings modern features the Quadro M6000 24 GB completely lacks, including 56 ray tracing cores and 224 tensor cores. Its smaller 12 GB memory footprint is offset by 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is 58.8% higher than the Quadro’s 317.4 GB/s.

The Quadro M6000 24 GB’s only clear advantage is memory capacity. Its 24 GB of VRAM is exactly double the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 12 GB. For workloads that require holding very large datasets in video memory, this could be a deciding factor. The Quadro also carries a higher TDP of 250 W compared to 220 W, and its predecessor/successor lineage (Quadro Kepler to Quadro Pascal) marks it as a professional workstation card, while the RTX 4070 SUPER belongs to the GeForce 40-series consumer line with a GeForce 30 predecessor and GeForce 50 successor.

The launch MSRP for the Quadro M6000 24 GB is 4,999 USD, while the RTX 4070 SUPER has a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The average benchmark scores are statistically tied at 43,262 vs 43,223, but the distribution of performance could not be more different. The RTX 4070 SUPER is the logical choice for anyone running modern graphics workloads, gaming, or any application that benefits from ray tracing or tensor core acceleration. The Quadro M6000 24 GB is only relevant for niche use cases that specifically require more than 12 GB of VRAM and do not depend on the massive compute advantage of the newer architecture.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 SUPER wins decisively in every head-to-head benchmark recorded. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 172,795 crushes the Quadro’s 40,098, and its Geekbench Vulkan score of 205,624 dwarfs the Quadro’s 46,425. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s 224 tensor cores and 56 ray tracing cores make it the only option for applications that leverage these features. Its FP16 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS (1:1) opens up compute workloads that the Quadro cannot handle, as the older card lists no FP16 capability. The newer card also has a higher pixel rate (198.0 GPixel/s vs 106.9 GPixel/s) and texture rate (554.4 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel/s), indicating faster fill-rate-bound operations.

The Quadro M6000 24 GB wins on memory capacity alone. Its 24 GB VRAM is double that of the RTX 4070 SUPER, which could matter for datasets that exceed 12 GB. The Quadro also has a wider memory bus at 384 bit vs 192 bit, though this does not translate to higher bandwidth. The older card’s higher TDP of 250 W suggests it draws more power, but it also uses a simpler 1x 8-pin power connector compared to the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 1x 16-pin. For users with older systems, the Quadro’s PCIe 3.0 x16 interface is more compatible with legacy motherboards, while the RTX 4070 SUPER requires PCIe 4.0 x16 for full bandwidth. The Quadro’s display outputs include 1x DVI and 4x DisplayPort 1.2, whereas the RTX 4070 SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, making the newer card better suited for modern high-refresh-rate displays.