NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and RTX 4070 SUPER are two generations of NVIDIA's mainstream-to-high-end GPU stack, and the benchmark data shows a decisive, but not uniform, performance advantage for the newer card. Across the ten head-to-head tests, the RTX 5070 Ti wins every single matchup, with the largest margins in modern DirectX 12 workloads and compute tasks, while the older RTX 4070 SUPER remains competitive only in legacy DirectX 9 scenarios. This analysis breaks down where the performance gaps are largest, what architectural changes drive them, and which card is the better fit for specific use cases.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where the RTX 5070 Ti scores 6604 against the RTX 4070 SUPER's 4627. That is a 42.7% delta, the single biggest win for the newer card in any benchmark. This is a modern, demanding workload that heavily favors the Blackwell architecture's raw throughput and newer feature set.

Compute performance shows a similarly strong trend. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti posts 212363 points versus 172795 for the RTX 4070 SUPER, a 22.9% lead. The gap narrows somewhat in Geekbench Vulkan, where the RTX 5070 Ti scores 225122 against 205624, still a solid 9.5% advantage. This suggests the RTX 5070 Ti's advantage is more pronounced in general-purpose compute than in graphics-API-specific workloads.

In the Passmark suite, the RTX 5070 Ti wins every subtest, but the margins vary significantly. The Passmark GPU Compute test shows an 18.1% lead (20203 vs 17108), reinforcing the compute-heavy strength of the new card. The DirectX tests show a mixed picture: DirectX 10 has a 15% delta (192 vs 167), DirectX 12 has a 15.5% delta (127 vs 110), and DirectX 11 has a more modest 9.9% delta (300 vs 273).

The closest race is in Passmark DirectX 9, where the RTX 5070 Ti wins by just 2% (351 vs 344). This is a legacy API that neither card is optimized for, and the near-tie indicates that the RTX 4070 SUPER's higher boost clock of 2475 MHz versus the RTX 5070 Ti's 2452 MHz helps it keep pace in old, low-utilization workloads.

Finally, Passmark G3D (32974 vs 29995, a 9.9% delta) and Passmark G2D (1332 vs 1184, a 12.5% delta) round out the results. The G2D gap, which measures 2D graphics and desktop compositing, is notable because it shows the RTX 5070 Ti's advantage extends beyond raw 3D rendering. In summary, the RTX 5070 Ti is between 2% and 42.7% faster depending on the workload, with the largest leads in modern, compute-heavy scenarios.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on different architectures, nodes, and chip designs, which explains the benchmark gaps. The RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, while the RTX 4070 SUPER uses the AD104 chip on Ada Lovelace. Both are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the RTX 5070 Ti packs significantly more silicon: 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, versus 35,800 million on 294 mm² for the RTX 4070 SUPER. The transistor density is nearly identical (120.6M / mm² vs 121.8M / mm²), meaning the performance gain comes from a larger die rather than a denser one.

The compute core counts scale accordingly. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, compared to 7168 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 80 ROPs on the RTX 4070 SUPER. This translates to a 23.8% increase in shading units, which aligns with the compute benchmark wins. The RTX 5070 Ti also has more specialized hardware: 70 RT cores versus 56, and 280 tensor cores versus 224.

Clock speeds tell a nuanced story. The RTX 5070 Ti has a lower base clock (2295 MHz vs 1980 MHz) but a slightly lower boost clock (2452 MHz vs 2475 MHz). Despite the lower boost, the RTX 5070 Ti achieves higher FP32 throughput: 43.94 TFLOPS versus 35.48 TFLOPS. This is purely a function of having more cores; the per-clock efficiency is similar.

Memory is another major divergence. The RTX 5070 Ti uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, providing 504.2 GB/s. The RTX 5070 Ti's bandwidth advantage is 77.7%, which is critical for high-resolution textures and compute workloads. The memory clock also differs: 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5070 Ti versus 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) for the RTX 4070 SUPER.

Power and connectivity also differ. The RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP and recommends a 700 W PSU, while the RTX 4070 SUPER draws 220 W and suggests a 550 W PSU. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 16-pin connector. The RTX 5070 Ti uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RTX 4070 SUPER is on PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs also differ: the RTX 5070 Ti has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, whereas the RTX 4070 SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti wins everywhere in the data, but the magnitude of its wins dictates the use-case split. For modern gaming and 3D rendering, the RTX 5070 Ti is the clear choice. Its 42.7% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 shows it is far better equipped for current DirectX 12 titles. The 18.1% lead in Passmark GPU Compute also makes it the stronger pick for productivity tasks like video encoding, 3D modeling, or scientific simulations that leverage GPU compute.

The RTX 4070 SUPER's only relative strength is in legacy DirectX 9 workloads, where it is just 2% behind. If a user's primary software is an older game or application that runs on DX9, the performance difference is negligible, and the RTX 4070 SUPER's lower power draw becomes the more relevant factor. However, this is a narrow use case. For everything else, the RTX 5070 Ti's 9.5% to 22.9% leads in Vulkan and OpenCL, and its 9.9% to 15.5% leads across DirectX 10, 11, and 12, make it the more future-proof option.

The memory difference also creates a clear split. The RTX 5070 Ti's 16 GB frame buffer is better suited for 4K gaming or large datasets, while the RTX 4070 SUPER's 12 GB may be sufficient for 1080p or 1440p gaming but could be a bottleneck in VR or high-resolution texture packs. The RTX 5070 Ti's 77.7% higher memory bandwidth amplifies this advantage in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios.

FAQ

Q: Is the RTX 5070 Ti worth upgrading to from the RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: Benchmark results show a 42.7% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and a 22.9% lead in Geekbench OpenCL. If those workloads matter, the performance uplift is substantial.

Q: Which card is more power-efficient?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has a 220 W TDP versus 300 W for the RTX 5070 Ti. The RTX 4070 SUPER also recommends a 550 W PSU compared to 700 W for the newer card.

Q: Do both cards support the same APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The difference is in hardware, not API compatibility.

Q: Is the RTX 5070 Ti faster in all benchmarks?

A: Yes. In the ten head-to-head tests, the RTX 5070 Ti wins all ten, with deltas ranging from 2% in Passmark DirectX 9 to 42.7% in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: What is the memory difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card is smaller?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER is shorter at 267 mm and narrower at 112 mm high and 42 mm wide, versus 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 48 mm wide for the RTX 5070 Ti. Both are dual-slot.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the RTX 5070 Ti is the faster card in every measured test. Its largest wins are in the most demanding modern workloads, making it the better choice for anyone building a high-performance gaming PC or a workstation that handles GPU compute. The 42.7% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 18.1% lead in Passmark GPU Compute are decisive. The RTX 5070 Ti's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth also make it more capable at higher resolutions and with larger datasets.

The RTX 4070 SUPER is not without merit. Its 220 W TDP makes it more power-efficient, and its smaller dimensions (267 mm vs 304 mm) make it easier to fit in compact cases. It also has a 2% near-tie in DirectX 9, which is irrelevant for modern use. For a builder on a strict power budget or with a small case, the RTX 4070 SUPER remains a viable option, but it is an older product (release date 2024-01-16 versus 2025-02-19 for the RTX 5070 Ti) and is listed as end-of-life. The RTX 5070 Ti is the clear winner for performance, with the only trade-offs being higher power draw and larger physical size.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB203 | AD104 |

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |

| Transistors | 45,600 million | 35,800 million |

| Die Size | 378 mm² | 294 mm² |

| Base Clock | 2295 MHz | 1980 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2452 MHz | 2475 MHz |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6X |

| Memory Bus | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 896.0 GB/s | 504.2 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 8960 | 7168 |

| TMUs | 280 | 224 |

| ROPs | 96 | 80 |

| RT Cores | 70 | 56 |

| Tensor Cores | 280 | 224 |

| Pixel Rate | 235.4 GPixel/s | 198.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 686.6 GTexel/s | 554.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 43.94 TFLOPS | 35.48 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 300 W | 220 W |

| Suggested PSU | 700 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Dimensions | 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm | 267 mm x 112 mm x 42 mm |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-02-19 | 2024-01-16 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 49957 | 43223 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 86 | 83 |