NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits the two cards cleanly along different workload priorities. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 is the only one with a measured benchmark score in the database, posting 4334.5 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. That places it in the 25th percentile of all GPUs tracked by the database, meaning roughly three-quarters of recorded graphics cards score higher. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark entries at all, so its performance profile must be inferred from its specification sheet rather than direct measurements.

Where the RTX 4070 GDDR6 wins is in raw rasterization throughput at standard resolutions. Its FP32 compute of 29.15 TFLOPS exceeds the LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS by about 18.6 percent. Texture fill rate also favors the NVIDIA card at 455.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. Those two metrics translate directly into faster pixel shading and texture-mapped geometry processing in conventional 3D workloads. The 4070 GDDR6 also delivers higher memory bandwidth at 480.0 GB/s compared to 432.0 GB/s for the LX PRO, which helps in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios like high-resolution texture streaming.

The LX PRO counters with advantages in other areas. It carries twice the memory capacity at 24 GB versus 12 GB, and its FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS versus the 4070 GDDR6's 29.15 TFLOPS (the NVIDIA part runs FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, while the LX PRO runs it at 2:1). Pixel fill rate favors the LX PRO at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 158.4 GPixel/s. The LX PRO also has more shading units (6144 versus 5888), more texture mapping units (192 versus 184), and more ROPs (96 versus 64). Its higher ROP count and pixel rate suggest an edge in fill-rate-bound workloads such as heavy post-processing or high-resolution framebuffer operations.

The LX PRO's larger memory pool makes it the choice for capacity-hungry tasks like large dataset rendering or high-resolution texture sets, while the NVIDIA card leads in measured compute throughput and memory bandwidth. The RTX 4070 GDDR6 has ray tracing cores (46) and tensor cores (184); the LX PRO's specification sheet lists no RT or tensor core counts, so any AI acceleration or ray tracing capability for that card is undocumented in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural lineages. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 uses the AD104 chip built on Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. That yields a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on an architecture labeled TrueGPU, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

Memory configurations differ substantially. Both use GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, but the RTX 4070 GDDR6 runs at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective) for 480.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the LX PRO runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for 432.0 GB/s. Capacity differs sharply: 12 GB on the NVIDIA card versus 24 GB on the LX PRO.

Compute unit counts also diverge. The RTX 4070 GDDR6 has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no RT or tensor core counts listed. The LX PRO's pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s comes from its 96 ROPs, while the RTX 4070 GDDR6's 158.4 GPixel/s comes from 64 ROPs. Texture rate favors NVIDIA at 455.4 GTexel/s despite fewer TMUs because of the higher clock speeds.

Clock behavior is only partially documented. The RTX 4070 GDDR6 has a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The LX PRO lists no base or boost clocks in the database, so its performance characteristics cannot be tied to specific frequencies.

API support is nearly identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4070 GDDR6 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs differ: the NVIDIA card has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Power and physical specifications are close. The RTX 4070 GDDR6 is rated at 200 W TDP, the LX PRO at 225 W. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 16-pin power connector and a suggested 550 W PSU. The NVIDIA card is 240 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. The LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. Both use PCIe 4.0 x16.

Production status differs. The RTX 4070 GDDR6 is end-of-life, released on 2024-08-19, with the GeForce 30 as predecessor and GeForce 50 as successor. The LX PRO is active, released on 2026-03-16, with no predecessor or successor listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark comparisons exist in the database between these two cards. The RTX 4070 GDDR6 has a single recorded benchmark score of 4334.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while the LX PRO has no benchmark entries. Direct numerical comparison between the two in the same test is therefore impossible.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 4070 GDDR6 provide context for its measured performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 4360, which is 0.6 percent higher than the 4070 GDDR6. The AMD FirePro W2100 scores 4295, 0.9 percent lower. The NVIDIA GeForce 930M scores 4388, 1.2 percent higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M scores 4282, 1.2 percent lower. These deltas show the 4070 GDDR6 sitting in a tight cluster, within roughly 1.2 percentage points of all four nearest rivals. Its 25th percentile ranking reflects that it outperforms only about a quarter of the database's tracked GPUs, which is consistent with a mid-range positioning rather than a top-tier one.

The LX PRO has no nearest rivals and no measured scores, so its relative standing cannot be quantified from the database. Its 50th percentile rating appears to be a placeholder derived from the absence of benchmark data rather than from actual performance measurement.

The compute gap between the two cards is the clearest numerical comparison available. FP32 performance of 29.15 TFLOPS for the RTX 4070 GDDR6 versus 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO represents a 4.57 TFLOPS difference, or roughly 18.6 percent in favor of NVIDIA. FP16 performance reverses: the LX PRO's 49.15 TFLOPS is 68.6 percent higher than the 4070 GDDR6's 29.15 TFLOPS. Memory bandwidth favors NVIDIA by 48.0 GB/s, or 11.1 percent. Pixel rate favors the LX PRO by 33.6 GPixel/s, or 21.2 percent. Texture rate favors NVIDIA by 71.4 GTexel/s, or 18.6 percent.

The RTX 4070 GDDR6 also has a higher memory clock (2500 MHz versus 2250 MHz) and effective data rate (20 Gbps versus 18 Gbps). The LX PRO's 24 GB capacity is exactly double the 4070 GDDR6's 12 GB.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 delivers 29.15 TFLOPS in FP32, compared to 24.58 TFLOPS for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The RTX 4070 GDDR6 has 12 GB of GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus and 480.0 GB/s bandwidth at 20 Gbps effective. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth at 18 Gbps effective.

Q: Does either card support ray tracing?

A: The RTX 4070 GDDR6 lists 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores. The LX PRO's specification sheet lists no RT or tensor core counts, so no ray tracing or AI acceleration data is recorded for it.

Q: What is the measured benchmark score for each card?

A: The RTX 4070 GDDR6 scores 4334.5 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The LX PRO has no benchmark entries in the database.

Q: Which card has more ROPs and what does that mean?

A: The LX PRO has 96 ROPs versus 64 for the RTX 4070 GDDR6. This contributes to the LX PRO's higher pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, compared to 158.4 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA card.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The RTX 4070 GDDR6 has a 200 W TDP, while the LX PRO has a 225 W TDP. Both use a single 16-pin power connector and a suggested 550 W PSU.

The Verdict

The data shows two cards optimized for different workloads. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 is the safer choice for measured performance, as it is the only one with a recorded benchmark score. Its 4334.5 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while modest at the 25th percentile, at least quantifies its capabilities. The LX PRO has no measured results, so any purchase decision for it relies entirely on specification-derived expectations.

For standard gaming and general 3D rendering, the RTX 4070 GDDR6 appears stronger. Its FP32 throughput of 29.15 TFLOPS, texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s, and memory bandwidth of 480.0 GB/s all exceed the LX PRO's corresponding figures. The 4070 GDDR6 also has ray tracing cores and tensor cores, which the LX PRO does not document.

The LX PRO is the pick for workloads that need large memory capacity or high FP16 compute. Its 24 GB of GDDR6 is double the 4070 GDDR6's 12 GB, and its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is substantially higher. The LX PRO's 96 ROPs and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate also give it an edge in fill-rate-bound operations.

The production status is a differentiator. The RTX 4070 GDDR6 is end-of-life, with a successor already named (GeForce 50). The LX PRO is active, released later, with no successor planned. For users who prefer an actively supported product, the LX PRO holds the advantage.

Power consumption is comparable, with the LX PRO drawing 225 W versus 200 W for the NVIDIA card. Physical dimensions are similar, though the LX PRO is slightly larger in all three dimensions. Both fit in dual-slot chassis with the same power connector and PSU recommendation.

The absence of direct benchmark comparisons means the verdict rests on specification analysis. The RTX 4070 GDDR6 wins on measured performance, FP32 compute, memory bandwidth, and feature count. The LX PRO wins on memory capacity, FP16 throughput, pixel rate, and production status. Users who prioritize proven performance should choose the NVIDIA card. Users who need more VRAM or higher FP16 throughput should choose the LX PRO.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---------------|------------------------------|---------------------|

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TrueGPU |

| Chip | AD104 | 7G105 |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 35,800 million | unknown |

| Die size | 294 mm² | unknown |

| Memory size | 12 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory clock | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory bandwidth | 480.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 5888 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 184 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT cores | 46 | null |

| Tensor cores | 184 | null |

| Pixel rate | 158.4 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 455.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 29.15 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Base clock | 1920 MHz | null |

| Boost clock | 2475 MHz | null |

| TDP | 200 W | 225 W |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Length | 240 mm | 248 mm |

| Height | 110 mm | 118 mm |

| Width | 40 mm | 48 mm |

| Production status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release date | 2024-08-19 | 2026-03-16 |

| Predecessor | GeForce 30 | null |

| Successor | GeForce 50 | null |

| Launch MSRP | 599 USD | null |