NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA T400 Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and NVIDIA T400 are both end-of-life graphics cards from NVIDIA, but they target entirely different segments of the market. The RTX 4060 is a modern Ada Lovelace consumer card built for gaming and general compute, while the T400 is a low-profile Turing-based workstation card designed for basic multi-display office setups. The benchmark data reflects this chasm: the RTX 4060 wins both shared tests by overwhelming margins, with a 457.9% lead in Geekbench OpenCL and a 204.5% lead in Geekbench Vulkan. However, the T400's 60th percentile ranking versus the RTX 4060's 61st percentile shows that raw compute performance is not the only factor in how these cards slot into the broader GPU landscape.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 is the clear winner in every metric where both cards have been tested. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4060 scores 95,057 versus the T400's 17,039, a difference of 457.9%. The Vulkan test tells a similar story: 48,643 for the RTX 4060 against 15,976 for the T400, a 204.5% advantage. The RTX 4060 also has a higher average benchmark score of 17,639 compared to the T400's 16,508. The RTX 4060 wins all 2 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the T400 wins none.

The T400's only advantage is in its physical and power profile. It is a single-slot card with no power connectors, a 30W TDP, and a suggested PSU of 200W. The RTX 4060 is a dual-slot card with a 1x 12-pin power connector, a 115W TDP, and a suggested PSU of 300W. For a low-profile workstation that needs to drive multiple displays without requiring additional power cabling, the T400 is the more practical choice. The T400 also uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, while the RTX 4060 uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural generations. The RTX 4060 uses the AD107 chip built on Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5nm process at TSMC. It packs 18,900 million transistors into a 159 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The T400 uses the TU117 chip on Turing architecture, fabricated on a 12nm process, also at TSMC. It has 4,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, with a density of 23.5M per mm². The RTX 4060's smaller, denser die gives it a massive compute advantage.

The RTX 4060 has 3,072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It also includes 24 ray-tracing cores and 96 tensor cores, which the T400 lacks entirely. The T400 has 384 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with no RT or tensor core support. The RTX 4060 also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the T400 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). Both cards support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Memory configurations differ substantially. The RTX 4060 has 8GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The T400 has 2GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, giving 80.00 GB/s. The RTX 4060's memory clock is 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective), while the T400 runs at 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective). The RTX 4060 also has a much higher boost clock of 2460 MHz versus the T400's 1425 MHz, with base clocks of 1830 MHz and 420 MHz respectively.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only two benchmarks where both cards have results are Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan. In OpenCL, the RTX 4060 scores 95,057 against the T400's 17,039. That is a 457.9% delta, meaning the RTX 4060 delivers nearly five and a half times the compute throughput in this general-purpose workload. This is consistent with the massive difference in shading units (3,072 vs 384) and FP32 throughput (15.11 TFLOPS vs 1,094.4 GFLOPS).

In Vulkan, the RTX 4060 scores 48,643 versus the T400's 15,976, a 204.5% advantage. While still a decisive victory, the gap narrows compared to OpenCL. Vulkan workloads can be more driver-dependent and may scale differently with memory bandwidth and cache hierarchies. The RTX 4060's 96 tensor cores and 24 RT cores do not directly accelerate Vulkan rasterization, but the raw shader count advantage remains overwhelming.

Looking at the RTX 4060's broader benchmark suite, it shows strong results across different APIs: Passmark G3D score of 19,545, Passmark GPU Compute of 9,213, and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 of 2,302. The T400 has no results for these tests, so direct comparison is impossible, but the RTX 4060's average benchmark score of 17,639 places it near the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17,666, -0.2%) and AMD Radeon 780M (17,588, +0.3%). The T400's average score of 16,508 sits near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (16,504, 0%) and AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16,415, +0.6%).

FAQ

Q: Which card has better raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 4060 wins decisively. It scores 95,057 in Geekbench OpenCL versus 17,039 for the T400, a 457.9% lead. In Vulkan, the RTX 4060 scores 48,643 against 15,976, a 204.5% advantage.

Q: Does the T400 support ray tracing or tensor cores?

A: No. The T400 has no RT cores and no tensor cores. The RTX 4060 includes 24 ray-tracing cores and 96 tensor cores, which are part of its Ada Lovelace architecture.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The T400 has a 30W TDP, no power connectors, and a suggested PSU of 200W. The RTX 4060 has a 115W TDP, requires a 1x 12-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 300W.

Q: How do the memory specs compare?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. The T400 has 2GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 80.00 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4060's memory runs at 17 Gbps effective versus 10 Gbps for the T400.

Q: Which card has better driver and API support?

A: The RTX 4060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the T400 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Is the T400 suitable for gaming?

A: The data does not support gaming use. The T400 has only 384 shading units, a 1,094.4 GFLOPS FP32 rate, and no RT or tensor cores. Its benchmark scores are a fraction of the RTX 4060's, which itself is a mid-range gaming card.

The Verdict

The data points to an unambiguous conclusion: the RTX 4060 is vastly more powerful in every tested workload. Its OpenCL score is 457.9% higher and its Vulkan score is 204.5% higher. The RTX 4060's 8GB memory, 272.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it a capable card for gaming, content creation, and general compute. The T400's 2GB memory and 1,094.4 GFLOPS FP32 rate are suited only for basic display output and light 2D workloads.

Choose the RTX 4060 if you need any level of 3D rendering, gaming, or compute acceleration. Its 61st percentile ranking versus all GPUs and its average benchmark score of 17,639 place it in the mid-range of the GPU hierarchy. Choose the T400 only if your priority is a single-slot, low-power card that runs on a 200W PSU with no external power connectors. Its 60th percentile ranking is misleading in context, as its average score of 16,508 is dragged up by a small benchmark sample that does not include demanding workloads. For any task that requires more than basic video output, the RTX 4060 is the only rational choice.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA T400 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | AD107 | TU117 |

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |

| Generation | GeForce 40 | Quadro Turing (Tx000) |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |

| Transistors | 18,900 million | 4,700 million |

| Die Size | 159 mm² | 200 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 118.9M / mm² | 23.5M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1830 MHz | 420 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz | 1425 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective) | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 2 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 64 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 272.0 GB/s | 80.00 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 3072 | 384 |

| TMUs | 96 | 24 |

| ROPs | 48 | 16 |

| RT Cores | 24 | None |

| Tensor Cores | 96 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 118.1 GPixel/s | 22.80 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 236.2 GTexel/s | 34.20 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 15.11 TFLOPS | 1,094.4 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1) | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 115 W | 30 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | 200 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Release Date | 2023-05-17 | 2021-05-05 |

| Launch MSRP | 299 USD | Not specified |