NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 vs NVIDIA H20 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for either the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 or the NVIDIA H20. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counters for both parts sit at zero. Without measured performance data, no direct comparisons of frame rates, compute throughput, or application-specific results can be drawn from the records.

What the data does provide is a set of theoretical peak specifications that indicate where each GPU is designed to operate. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 delivers 22.06 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the H20 delivers 39.54 TFLOPS in the same precision. In FP16, the gap widens considerably: the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 maintains a 1:1 ratio at 22.06 TFLOPS, whereas the H20 doubles its rate to 79.07 TFLOPS with a 2:1 architecture. That difference in half-precision throughput points to the H20 being oriented toward workloads that rely heavily on reduced-precision arithmetic.

Texture processing also favors the H20. The H20 reaches 617.8 GTexel/s, compared to 344.8 GTexel/s for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104. Pixel throughput tells the opposite story: the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 produces 121.7 GPixel/s, while the H20 manages only 47.52 GPixel/s. This split suggests the two cards are optimized for fundamentally different output types, with the GeForce part prioritizing rasterization and display-centric rendering, and the Hopper part emphasizing compute throughput over pixel generation.

Memory bandwidth is another clear separator. The H20 uses 96 GB of HBM3 across a 6144-bit bus, yielding 4.03 TB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s. That is a factor of roughly 14 in favor of the H20, which aligns with its server positioning where large datasets and memory-intensive kernels are common. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104's memory subsystem is comparatively modest, appropriate for a consumer-oriented card with a 160 W TDP.

Clock speeds run in the opposite direction. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2535 MHz. The H20 operates at 1830 MHz base and 1980 MHz boost. Higher clocks on the GeForce part partially compensate for its smaller shader count, but the H20 still wins decisively in raw FP32 and FP16 throughput due to its larger execution resources.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database, and the H20 also holds a 50th percentile ranking. Both cards sit at the median of the recorded GPU population, though this percentile is based on all GPUs tracked, not on direct head-to-head measurements.

The Verdict

The recorded data draws a clear functional boundary between these two accelerators. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is a consumer graphics card with display outputs, DirectX 12 Ultimate support, and a 160 W TDP. The NVIDIA H20 is a server module with no display outputs, no DirectX or OpenGL or Vulkan support, and a 500 W TDP. Anyone requiring interactive rendering, gaming, or standard desktop graphics APIs should select the RTX 4060 Ti AD104, as the H20 lacks the necessary output and API support entirely.

For compute workloads that rely on FP16 performance or massive memory capacity, the H20 is the only choice from these two. Its 79.07 TFLOPS FP16 throughput and 96 GB HBM3 pool with 4.03 TB/s bandwidth dwarf the RTX 4060 Ti AD104's 22.06 TFLOPS FP16 and 8 GB GDDR6 with 288.0 GB/s. The H20 also uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, compared to the RTX 4060 Ti AD104's PCIe 4.0 x8, which affects host transfer rates in server environments.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is marked end-of-life, while the H20 remains active in production. The GeForce card has a launch MSRP of 399 USD, a figure the database records once, though the H20 has no launch MSRP listed. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 also has a successor in the GeForce 50 series, while the H20's successor is listed as Server Blackwell.

Neither card can substitute for the other across their respective intended roles. The H20 cannot drive a monitor, and the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 cannot match the H20's memory bandwidth or half-precision compute ceiling.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It uses the AD104 chip, which measures 294 mm² and contains 35,800 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The H20 is built on the Hopper architecture, also fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, but uses the GH100 chip, which measures 814 mm² and contains 80,000 million transistors, giving a density of 98.3 million per square millimeter. The H20's die is nearly three times larger in area and carries more than double the transistor count.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 4352 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs. It also includes 34 ray tracing cores and 136 tensor cores. The H20 has 9984 shading units, 312 texture mapping units, and only 24 ROPs. It has no listed ray tracing cores, but includes 312 tensor cores. The H20's ROP count is half that of the GeForce part, which explains its lower pixel rate despite having more than double the shader units.

Memory architectures differ completely. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses GDDR6 memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate, across a 128-bit bus. The H20 uses HBM3 memory at 1313 MHz with 5.3 Gbps effective data rate, across a 6144-bit bus. The HBM3 implementation provides a much wider interface and a far larger memory pool.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The H20 lists no API support for DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan, confirming its compute-only orientation. The GeForce card has display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a), while the H20 has no outputs at all.

Physical form factors also diverge. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is a dual-slot card measuring 240 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, using a single 16-pin power connector with a suggested 450 W PSU. The H20 is an SXM module with no listed dimensions or power connectors, and a suggested 900 W PSU. The H20 consumes 500 W versus the RTX 4060 Ti AD104's 160 W.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA H20 delivers 39.54 TFLOPS of FP32, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 delivers 22.06 TFLOPS. The H20 is roughly 79% higher in this measure.

Q: Does the NVIDIA H20 support graphics APIs?

A: No. The H20 lists DirectX as N/A, OpenGL as N/A, and Vulkan as N/A, and has no display outputs. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each card provide?

A: The H20 provides 4.03 TB/s from 96 GB of HBM3 across a 6144-bit bus. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 provides 288.0 GB/s from 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a 160 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The H20 has a 500 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 900 W.

Q: Which card has more tensor cores?

A: The H20 has 312 tensor cores. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 136 tensor cores.

Q: What are the production statuses of these GPUs?

A: The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is listed as end-of-life, while the H20 is listed as active.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 wins in pixel rate, delivering 121.7 GPixel/s versus 47.52 GPixel/s for the H20. It also operates at higher clock speeds, with a 2535 MHz boost versus 1980 MHz for the H20. It has a smaller physical footprint as a dual-slot card, uses less power at 160 W, and includes display outputs plus full graphics API support. Its transistor density is higher at 121.8 million per square millimeter, and it is built on a smaller die of 294 mm².

The H20 wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 figure of 39.54 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 4060 Ti AD104's 22.06 TFLOPS. Its FP16 figure of 79.07 TFLOPS is more than triple the GeForce card's 22.06 TFLOPS. The H20 also wins in texture rate at 617.8 GTexel/s versus 344.8 GTexel/s, memory capacity at 96 GB versus 8 GB, memory bandwidth at 4.03 TB/s versus 288.0 GB/s, and memory bus width at 6144 bit versus 128 bit. It has more shading units at 9984 versus 4352, more TMUs at 312 versus 136, more tensor cores at 312 versus 136, and a faster bus interface at PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x8.

The H20 also carries a larger transistor count at 80,000 million versus 35,800 million, and a larger die at 814 mm² versus 294 mm². It is the active production part, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is end-of-life.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture with an AD104 chip, while the H20 uses Hopper with a GH100 chip. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is in the GeForce 40 generation, while the H20 is in the Server Hopper generation. The H20's die is 814 mm² versus 294 mm², and its transistor count is 80,000 million versus 35,800 million, though the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a higher transistor density at 121.8M per mm² versus 98.3M per mm².

Clock speeds differ: the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 runs at 2310 MHz base and 2535 MHz boost, while the H20 runs at 1830 MHz base and 1980 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ, with the GeForce card at 2250 MHz and 18 Gbps effective, and the H20 at 1313 MHz and 5.3 Gbps effective. Memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all favor the H20: 96 GB HBM3, 6144 bit, 4.03 TB/s versus 8 GB GDDR6, 128 bit, 288.0 GB/s.

Shader resources are higher on the H20 for shading units (9984 versus 4352), TMUs (312 versus 136), and tensor cores (312 versus 136). The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 48 ROPs versus 24, and it has 34 ray tracing cores while the H20 lists none. Pixel rate favors the GeForce card at 121.7 GPixel/s versus 47.52 GPixel/s, while texture rate favors the H20 at 617.8 GTexel/s versus 344.8 GTexel/s. FP32 favors the H20 at 39.54 TFLOPS versus 22.06 TFLOPS, and FP16 favors the H20 at 79.07 TFLOPS versus 22.06 TFLOPS with different ratios (2:1 versus 1:1).

Power and physical specifications diverge: 160 W versus 500 W TDP, dual-slot versus SXM module, 1x 16-pin connector versus none listed, 450 W versus 900 W suggested PSU, PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 5.0 x16, display outputs present versus none, and DirectX/OpenGL/Vulkan support versus none. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has dimensions of 240 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm, while the H20 has no listed dimensions. The GeForce card is end-of-life, released on 2024-03-31, with a launch MSRP of 399 USD; the H20 is active, released on 2024-01-31, with no launch MSRP. Their predecessors and successors also differ: the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 follows GeForce 30 and precedes GeForce 50, while the H20 follows Server Ada and precedes Server Blackwell.