NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO shows two distinctly different products with no direct head-to-head benchmark overlap. The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2913, placing it in the 19th percentile among all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark entries in the database, so its percentile of 50 is based on spec-derived positioning rather than measured performance.

The data indicates the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB is the only one of the two with verified performance measurements. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF at 2910 (0.1% behind), the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2907 (0.2% behind), the Quadro P600 at 2923 (0.3% ahead), and the RTX 4010 at 2893 (0.7% ahead). This places the 8 GB card in a tight cluster where performance differences are within one percent.

For the Lisuan Tech LX PRO, the absence of benchmark data means any performance conclusion must rely on its stated specifications. The card lists a 24 GB GDDR6 memory configuration with a 192 bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, alongside 6144 shading units and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. These figures exceed the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB in raw compute and memory capacity, but without measured scores, the database cannot confirm real-world behavior.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB is a validated, end-of-life product with a known benchmark footprint. The LX PRO is an active product with a 2026 release date, but its lack of recorded benchmarks means it remains unproven in the database. Users who require verified performance data should favor the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB. Users who prioritize memory capacity and raw specification counts may consider the LX PRO, but they do so without database confirmation.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB wins in the only measured benchmark category. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2913 is the sole recorded performance data point in this comparison. The card sits within 0.7% of its nearest rivals, showing consistent performance in its class. The LX PRO has zero recorded wins because it has zero recorded benchmarks.

The LX PRO wins on specification-driven metrics. It lists 24 GB of GDDR6 memory versus 8 GB for the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, a threefold capacity advantage. Its memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s exceeds the 288.0 GB/s of the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB by 50%. The LX PRO also lists higher shading unit count (6144 versus 4352), higher texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s versus 344.8 GTexel/s), and higher pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s versus 121.7 GPixel/s). FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 22.06 TFLOPS, a 11.4% advantage.

The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB counters with architectural maturity. It uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process, while the LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process. The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB includes 34 RT cores and 136 tensor cores; the LX PRO lists no RT or tensor core counts in the database. The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB also supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO lists Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB uses the AD106 chip built on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip built on the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation.

The process nodes differ: the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB uses a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the LX PRO uses a 6 nm process at TSMC. The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB has a die size of 188 mm² with 22,900 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The LX PRO lists unknown die size and transistor count in the database, so no density figure is available.

Memory architecture differs significantly. The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB uses an 8 GB GDDR6 configuration on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO uses a 24 GB GDDR6 configuration on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both run memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Compute resources show the LX PRO with higher counts across the board: 6144 shading units versus 4352, 192 TMUs versus 136, and 96 ROPs versus 48. The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB includes 34 RT cores and 136 tensor cores, while the LX PRO has no RT or tensor core data recorded. FP16 throughput differs structurally: the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB runs FP16 at 22.06 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio with FP32), while the LX PRO runs FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio with FP32).

The bus interface also differs. The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs vary: the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB has one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the LX PRO has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Both cards are dual-slot designs with a single 16-pin power connector. The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB lists a 160 W TDP with a 450 W suggested PSU; the LX PRO lists a 225 W TDP with a 550 W suggested PSU.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a recorded benchmark score in the database?

A: Only the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB has a recorded benchmark, scoring 2913 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark entries.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2913, which is 0.1% ahead of the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910), 0.2% ahead of the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907), 0.3% behind the Quadro P600 (2923), and 0.7% ahead of the RTX 4010 (2893).

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The LX PRO lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is 11.4% higher than the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB at 22.06 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the LX PRO have ray tracing or tensor cores?

A: The database records no RT core or tensor core counts for the LX PRO. The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB lists 34 RT cores and 136 tensor cores.

Q: What are the production statuses of these GPUs?

A: The RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB is marked end-of-life with a release date of May 17, 2023. The LX PRO is marked active with a release date of March 16, 2026.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB and the LX PRO. The wins count stands at zero for both cards in direct comparison.

The only measured score belongs to the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB: 2913 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This score places the card in the 19th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival comparisons confirm tight grouping: the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF trails by 0.1%, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB trails by 0.2%, the Quadro P600 leads by 0.3%, and the RTX 4010 trails by 0.7%. These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating that the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB performs in a very narrow performance band relative to its closest competitors.

For the LX PRO, the database shows an average benchmark score of zero and no nearest rivals. The percentile of 50 cannot be validated against measured data. The specification sheet suggests higher raw throughput: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 22.06 TFLOPS for the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s, and 6144 shading units versus 4352. These figures imply the LX PRO could outperform the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB in compute-heavy workloads, but the database offers no measured confirmation.

The biggest wins for the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB are its verified benchmark presence, its RT core and tensor core support, its Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility, and its lower power draw at 160 W versus 225 W. The biggest wins for the LX PRO are its 24 GB memory capacity, its 192 bit bus, its 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, its higher shading unit and ROP counts, and its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two GPUs differ in the database.

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TrueGPU |

| Generation | GeForce 40 | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 22,900 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 188 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor Density | 121.8M / mm² | Not recorded |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 4352 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 136 | 192 |

| ROPs | 48 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 34 | Not recorded |

| Tensor Cores | 136 | Not recorded |

| Pixel Rate | 121.7 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 344.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 22.06 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 22.06 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 160 W | 225 W |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | 240 mm length, 111 mm height, 40 mm width | 248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2023-05-17 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 399 USD | Not recorded |

| Benchmark Score | 2913 | None recorded |

| Percentile | 19 | 50 |