GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1890 MHz
TDP 115 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A1000

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1462 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
89,420
52,078
geekbench_vulkan
89,569
49,574
passmark_directx_10
107
N/A
passmark_directx_11
157
N/A
passmark_directx_12
73
N/A
passmark_directx_9
216
N/A
passmark_g2d
730
N/A
passmark_g3d
17,469
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
6,816
N/A
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
969

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

If analyzing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile with the NVIDIA RTX A1000, the benchmark gap becomes obviously noticeable. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile takes the crown in essentially each game we ran. The gap is considerable sufficiently to influence practical rendering performance. Users should observe improved frame rates. The assessment is evident.

the NVIDIA RTX A1000 struggles to compete with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile's absolute power. In cost-sensitive buyers, the NVIDIA RTX A1000 could still deliver sufficient performance, but those demanding the best results might look toward NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. The benchmark difference is sufficiently considerable to overlook. Resource-hungry titles especially showcase this difference. The premium provides dividends in frame rates.

the NVIDIA RTX A1000 faces challenges to compete with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile's raw capability. In price-conscious consumers, the NVIDIA RTX A1000 can yet deliver adequate frame rates, yet people wanting premium quality will look toward NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. The gaming difference is sufficiently considerable to ignore. Intensive games notably highlight this difference. The price gap pays returns in frame rates.

The bottom line: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile claims this matchup decisively. Consumers wanting graphics capability will certainly consider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile over the NVIDIA RTX A1000. This test numbers validates this recommendation. Your scenarios should execute substantially more fluidly. It's a obvious winner in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 4060 Mobile
RTX A1000
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,072
2,304 -25.0%
Shaders
3,072
2,304 -25.0%
TMUs
96
72 -25.0%
ROPs
48
32 -33.3%
SM Count
24
18 -25.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
1545 MHz
727 MHz
Boost Clock
1890 MHz
1462 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
8,192 0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
256.0 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
32 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
90.72 GPixel/s
46.78 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
181.4 GTexel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
11.61 TFLOPS
6.737 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
181.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
105.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
11.61 TFLOPS (1:1)
6.737 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
24
18 -25.0%
Tensor Cores
96
72 -25.0%
Power
TDP
115 W
50 W
TDP (W)
115
50 -56.5%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ampere
GPU Name
AD107
GA107
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
18,900 million
8,700 million
Die Size
159 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
118.9M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 30 Mobile
Quadro Turing
Successor
GeForce 50 Mobile
Workstation Ada
View GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile Details View RTX A1000 Details