NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a stark contrast between two active graphics cards. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is a low-power, entry-level Ampere part that scores 2893 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it at the 18th percentile of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, by contrast, is a high-end TrueGPU architecture part with no recorded benchmark score in the database, but its specifications place it at the 50th percentile, indicating a fundamentally higher performance tier. The verdict is clear: the LX PRO is designed for compute-heavy, high-resolution workloads, while the RTX 4010 serves as a basic, low-profile solution for systems with minimal power delivery.

Users requiring 24 GB of memory, a 192-bit bus, and over 24 TFLOPS of FP32 performance should select the LX PRO. Those with power constraints, a single-slot footprint, and no need for high memory capacity should choose the RTX 4010. The data shows no overlap in their intended use cases; the LX PRO is a dual-slot, 225 W card with a 16-pin connector, whereas the RTX 4010 draws 50 W, uses no external power connector, and fits in a 163 mm length. The benchmark percentile gap (18 vs 50) reinforces that the LX PRO belongs to a much higher performance class, even without a direct score.

Architecture Differences

The two cards share no architectural lineage. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 uses the GA107 chip on an 8 nm Samsung process, with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. Its transistor density is 43.5M per mm². The architecture is Ampere, a generation removed from its immediate predecessor, the GeForce 30 series. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process, with the architecture designated as TrueGPU and the generation as 7G100. Transistor count and die size for the LX PRO are unknown in the database.

The RTX 4010 has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs. It includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, which are absent from the LX PRO's specification fields. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no RT or tensor core data recorded. The FP32 throughput is 2.706 TFLOPS for the RTX 4010 versus 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO, a 9.1x difference. FP16 on the RTX 4010 is 2.706 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, indicating a much stronger compute pipeline for the latter.

Memory architectures diverge sharply. The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s, which is 4.5x higher. Memory clocks also differ: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for the RTX 4010 versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX PRO. The RTX 4010 supports PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16, doubling the interface width. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the RTX 4010 supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for these two cards. However, the RTX 4010 has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893, while the LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0, with no tests listed. This absence of a direct comparison is itself informative: the LX PRO's performance cannot be quantified from current measurements, but its percentile rank of 50 versus the RTX 4010's 18 suggests a substantial gap.

Comparing the RTX 4010 to its nearest rivals provides context for its standing. The RTX 4010 scores 2893, which is 0.5% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (score 2907), 0.6% below the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (score 2910), 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (score 2913), and 1% below the NVIDIA Quadro P600 (score 2923). These deltas are all within a narrow 1% band, indicating that the RTX 4010 performs at a level comparable to those older or lower-tier cards in this specific test, despite its much lower power draw.

For the LX PRO, the absence of rivals in the database means no direct numerical comparisons can be made. Its specifications, however, show pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s, which are 6.8x and 9.1x the RTX 4010's respective rates of 28.19 GPixel/s and 42.29 GTexel/s. These fillrate figures suggest the LX PRO would dominate in rasterization-heavy tasks, but without benchmark scores, this remains an inference from the recorded data.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have a higher benchmark score than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark score for the LX PRO (average score of 0), while the RTX 4010 scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The LX PRO's percentile rank of 50 versus the RTX 4010's 18 indicates a higher performance class, but no direct score exists.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two cards?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6, while the LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6. The LX PRO also has a 192-bit memory bus versus the RTX 4010's 64-bit bus, resulting in 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 96.00 GB/s.

Q: Which card requires an external power connector?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO requires a single 16-pin connector and has a suggested PSU of 550 W. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W.

Q: How do the shading unit counts compare?

A: The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, which is 8 times the 768 shading units of the RTX 4010. The LX PRO also has 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs versus 24 TMUs and 16 ROPs on the RTX 4010.

Q: Are both cards compatible with the same graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4010 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3, a minor version difference.

Q: What are the physical size differences?

A: The RTX 4010 is 163 mm long and 69 mm high, single-slot. The LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide, dual-slot. The LX PRO is significantly larger in all dimensions.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4010 wins in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 50 W TDP requires no external power connector and a 250 W suggested PSU, making it suitable for small-form-factor builds or systems with limited power delivery. Its single-slot design and 163 mm length allow installation in compact chassis. The card's 4 GB memory and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth are modest, but its PCIe 4.0 x8 interface still provides adequate bandwidth for low-resolution gaming or basic display output. Its four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups without occupying additional slots. The RTX 4010 also has RT cores (6) and tensor cores (24), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads, though at a lower performance level than the LX PRO.

The LX PRO wins in raw compute, memory capacity, and bandwidth. Its 24 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is suited for large datasets, high-resolution textures, or machine learning training. The 6144 shading units and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide substantial throughput for rendering or compute tasks. The 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate indicate strong fillrate for high-resolution gaming or content creation. Its 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) suggests superior half-precision compute, which is valuable in AI inference. The dual-slot design with a 16-pin connector and 550 W suggested PSU accommodates higher power draw, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures full bandwidth to the host system.

Specific benchmark wins are absent due to missing LX PRO data, but the recorded specifications show the LX PRO leading in every compute and memory metric. The RTX 4010 leads only in power consumption (50 W vs 225 W) and physical size (163 mm vs 248 mm length). The RTX 4010's nearest rivals, all within a 1% delta in the Steel Nomad test, indicate its performance is comparable to cards like the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, but the LX PRO's percentile rank of 50 places it in the upper half of all GPUs, a category the RTX 4010 does not reach.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two cards, based solely on the recorded data:

• Chip: GA107 (RTX 4010) vs 7G105 (LX PRO)
• Architecture: Ampere vs TrueGPU
• Generation: GeForce 40 vs 7G100
• Process node: 8 nm vs 6 nm
• Foundry: Samsung vs TSMC
• Transistors: 8,700 million vs unknown
• Die size: 200 mm² vs unknown
• Transistor density: 43.5M / mm² vs null
• Base clock: 1417 MHz vs null
• Boost clock: 1762 MHz vs null
• Memory clock: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective)
• Memory size: 4 GB vs 24 GB
• Memory bus width: 64 bit vs 192 bit
• Memory bandwidth: 96.00 GB/s vs 432.0 GB/s
• Shading units: 768 vs 6144
• TMUs: 24 vs 192
• ROPs: 16 vs 96
• RT cores: 6 vs null
• Tensor cores: 24 vs null
• Pixel rate: 28.19 GPixel/s vs 192.0 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 42.29 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel/s
• FP32: 2.706 TFLOPS vs 24.58 TFLOPS
• FP16: 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1) vs 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 50 W vs 225 W
• Slot width: Single-slot vs Dual-slot
• Power connectors: None vs 1x 16-pin
• Suggested PSU: 250 W vs 550 W
• Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 vs PCIe 4.0 x16
• Display outputs: 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a vs 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
• Vulkan support: 1.4 vs 1.3
• Length: 163 mm (6.4 inches) vs 248 mm (9.8 inches)
• Height: 69 mm (2.7 inches) vs 118 mm (4.6 inches)
• Width: null vs 48 mm (1.9 inches)
• Release date: 2024-04-15 vs 2026-03-16
• Predecessor: GeForce 30 vs null
• Successor: GeForce 50 vs null
• Average benchmark score: 2893 vs 0
• Percentile vs all GPUs: 18 vs 50
• Nearest rivals: RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, Quadro P600 vs none

The RTX 4010 includes RT and tensor cores, which the LX PRO lacks in recorded data. The LX PRO has a wider memory bus, larger memory pool, and higher all compute rates. The RTX 4010 has a lower TDP, no power connector, and a smaller physical footprint. The LX PRO has a higher percentile rank, but no benchmark score to validate its performance. The database shows no head-to-head benchmarks, so direct comparison relies on specification-level differences.