NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 vs NVIDIA N1X 48SM Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains one benchmark result for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893 points. This places the RTX 4010 at the 18th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The NVIDIA N1X 48SM has no benchmark entries in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50. The percentile figure for the N1X 48SM, despite the absence of direct measurements, suggests it sits in the median range of all recorded GPUs, but the lack of any test results means the 2893 score from the RTX 4010 cannot be directly compared head-to-head.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 4010, based on average scores, are clustered tightly around its result. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB averages 2907 points, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX 4010. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF averages 2910 points, a 0.6% advantage. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB averages 2913 points, 0.7% ahead. The NVIDIA Quadro P600 averages 2923 points, a 1% lead. These deltas are minimal, indicating the RTX 4010 performs within a narrow band of these four products in this specific DX12 workload. The largest gap is the 1% difference against the Quadro P600, while the smallest is the 0.5% gap to the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB.

Because the N1X 48SM lacks benchmark data, the head-to-head section is defined by the absence of comparable measurements. The database shows zero wins for either product in direct comparisons. The RTX 4010 has one recorded benchmark, while the N1X 48SM has none. This asymmetry means any performance inference must rely on architectural specifications rather than measured scores. The data indicates the RTX 4010 is a tested, measurable product, whereas the N1X 48SM is listed with no verified performance results.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural generations and design philosophies. The RTX 4010 uses the GA107 chip built on the Ampere architecture, manufactured on an 8 nm process at Samsung. The N1X 48SM uses the GB20B chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference is significant: 8 nm versus 5 nm, which typically indicates a denser and more power-efficient transistor layout for the newer part, though the database does not record a transistor count for the N1X 48SM. The RTX 4010 contains 8,700 million transistors on a die size of 200 mm², giving a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². The N1X 48SM has a die size of 382 mm², nearly double the area, but its transistor count is listed as unknown, so no density comparison can be made.

Core counts diverge sharply. The RTX 4010 has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output pipelines. It also includes 6 ray tracing cores and 24 tensor cores. The N1X 48SM has 6144 shading units, 384 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It carries 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores. The N1X 48SM has 8 times the shading units, 16 times the TMUs, 3 times the ROPs, 8 times the ray tracing cores, and 8 times the tensor cores compared to the RTX 4010. These are structural differences that imply vastly different compute ceilings.

Clock speeds tell a mixed story. The RTX 4010 has a base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost clock of 1762 MHz. The N1X 48SM has a much lower base clock of 741 MHz but a significantly higher boost clock of 2346 MHz. The N1X 48SM’s boost clock is 584 MHz higher than the RTX 4010’s boost clock, which is unusual given its larger die and wider configuration. Memory clocks also differ: the RTX 4010 runs at 1500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective, while the N1X 48SM runs at 1067 MHz with 8.5 Gbps effective. The N1X 48SM has a lower memory clock but compensates with a much wider bus.

The memory subsystems are fundamentally different. The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The N1X 48SM has 128 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus, yielding 273.2 GB/s bandwidth. The N1X 48SM offers 32 times the memory capacity and roughly 2.85 times the bandwidth. The bus width difference (64-bit versus 256-bit) explains part of the bandwidth advantage, but the memory type also differs (GDDR6 versus LPDDR5X).

Rasterization and texture throughput figures reflect the core count disparities. The RTX 4010 achieves 28.19 GPixel/s pixel rate and 42.29 GTexel/s texture rate. The N1X 48SM achieves 112.6 GPixel/s and 900.9 GTexel/s. The N1X 48SM’s pixel rate is 4 times higher, while its texture rate is over 21 times higher. Floating point performance follows the same pattern: the RTX 4010 delivers 2.706 TFLOPS for FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), while the N1X 48SM delivers 28.83 TFLOPS for both, a factor of roughly 10.65.

The N1X 48SM is classified as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no slot width, while the RTX 4010 is a single-slot discrete card. The N1X 48SM has a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the RTX 4010 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The N1X 48SM has no listed TDP, while the RTX 4010 has a 50 W TDP. The N1X 48SM has a 382 mm² die, which is large for an integrated solution, suggesting it may be part of a multi-chip module or a high-end integrated design. The RTX 4010 has a 200 mm² die and is a standalone card.

API support differs completely. The RTX 4010 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The N1X 48SM lists DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan as N/A. This indicates the N1X 48SM may not expose traditional graphics APIs, or the database lacks that information. The N1X 48SM also has a single HDMI output, while the RTX 4010 has four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Where Each One Wins

Based on recorded data, the RTX 4010 wins in the only measurable benchmark category: it has a concrete 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893, while the N1X 48SM has no score. The RTX 4010 also wins on clock speeds, with a higher base clock (1417 MHz versus 741 MHz) and a higher memory clock (1500 MHz versus 1067 MHz). The RTX 4010 has a lower boost clock (1762 MHz versus 2346 MHz), so the N1X 48SM wins in that specific metric. The RTX 4010 also wins on API support, offering DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, whereas the N1X 48SM lists N/A for all three. The RTX 4010 has a defined TDP of 50 W, while the N1X 48SM has none listed, which favors the RTX 4010 in terms of power reporting.

The N1X 48SM wins decisively on raw compute specifications. It has higher FP32, FP16, pixel rate, texture rate, shading units, TMUs, ROPs, ray tracing cores, tensor cores, memory size, memory bus width, memory bandwidth, and boost clock. The N1X 48SM also has a larger die (382 mm² versus 200 mm²), a newer process node (5 nm versus 8 nm), a newer architecture (Blackwell 2.0 versus Ampere), and a wider bus interface (PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x8). The N1X 48SM’s 128 GB memory capacity dwarfs the 4 GB on the RTX 4010.

The use-case split follows these patterns. For traditional discrete GPU tasks, such as gaming or workstation rendering with standard graphics APIs, the RTX 4010 has the advantage of verified benchmark performance and full API support. Its 4 GB GDDR6 memory is small but functional for lighter workloads. The N1X 48SM, despite its massive compute resources, has no recorded benchmark results and no API support entries, making it difficult to recommend for software that relies on DirectX or Vulkan. Its 128 GB LPDDR5X memory and 273.2 GB/s bandwidth suggest it is designed for memory-intensive compute tasks, possibly in AI or data processing, rather than conventional graphics rendering.

The N1X 48SM’s 28.83 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly 10.65 times the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS. This indicates the N1X 48SM is built for high-throughput parallel compute, while the RTX 4010 is a low-power (50 W) entry-level discrete solution. The RTX 4010’s single-slot form factor and lack of power connectors make it suitable for compact systems, whereas the N1X 48SM’s IGP classification means it is not a standalone card.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear conclusion: the two products serve entirely different purposes and cannot be considered direct competitors. The RTX 4010 is the only one with a measurable benchmark score (2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12) and full API support. It is a discrete, single-slot card with a 50 W TDP, PCIe 4.0 x8, and 4 GB GDDR6. The N1X 48SM has no benchmarks, no API support entries, and is an IGP with a 382 mm² die, 128 GB LPDDR5X, PCIe 5.0 x16, and 28.83 TFLOPS FP32.

For any workload requiring standard graphics APIs, the RTX 4010 is the only option with verified performance. The N1X 48SM’s N/A entries for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan mean it cannot be assumed to run conventional graphics software. Its 50th percentile ranking, despite having no benchmark score, is likely based on its specification-derived potential, but the database shows no evidence of actual performance.

For raw compute throughput, the N1X 48SM dominates on paper. Its 6144 shading units, 384 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 48 ray tracing cores, and 192 tensor cores are all multiples of the RTX 4010’s counts. The N1X 48SM’s 28.83 TFLOPS FP32 is 10.65 times higher, and its texture rate of 900.9 GTexel/s is 21.3 times higher. The memory capacity difference (128 GB versus 4 GB) and bandwidth difference (273.2 GB/s versus 96.00 GB/s) further separate the two.

The RTX 4010 sits at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, which is low, but its nearest rivals (RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, Quadro P600) are all within 1% of its score. This indicates the RTX 4010 is competitive within its narrow performance class. The N1X 48SM’s 50th percentile, despite no measurements, suggests the database ranks it as a mid-tier performer, but this is speculative without test results.

The production status for both is Active. The RTX 4010 was released on 2024-04-15, while the N1X 48SM was released on 2026-05-31. The RTX 4010 has a predecessor (GeForce 30) and a successor (GeForce 50), while the N1X 48SM has neither listed. The N1X 48SM is from the generation "Blackwell IGP (N1x)", which indicates it is part of an integrated product line.

The verdict is straightforward: the RTX 4010 is the choice for anyone needing a tested, API-compatible discrete GPU. The N1X 48SM is the choice for compute-heavy tasks that do not require traditional graphics APIs, based solely on its specifications, but the lack of benchmark data means its real-world performance is unverified.

FAQ

Q: What is the only benchmark score recorded for the RTX 4010?

A: The RTX 4010 has one recorded benchmark: 2893 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: How does the RTX 4010 compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB?

A: The RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has an average score of 2907, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX 4010’s 2893.

Q: Does the N1X 48SM have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No, the N1X 48SM has an empty benchmark list and an average score of 0.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6, while the N1X 48SM has 128 GB of LPDDR5X, a 32-fold difference.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 performance?

A: The N1X 48SM delivers 28.83 TFLOPS FP32, while the RTX 4010 delivers 2.706 TFLOPS, making the N1X 48SM about 10.65 times higher.

Q: What are the API support entries for the N1X 48SM?

A: The N1X 48SM lists DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan as N/A.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 | NVIDIA N1X 48SM |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Samsung | TSMC |

| Die Size | 200 mm² | 382 mm² |

| Base Clock | 1417 MHz | 741 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1762 MHz | 2346 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1500 MHz | 1067 MHz |

| Memory Size | 4 GB | 128 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus Width | 64 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 273.2 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 768 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 24 | 384 |

| ROPs | 16 | 48 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 48 |

| Tensor Cores | 24 | 192 |

| Pixel Rate | 28.19 GPixel/s | 112.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 42.29 GTexel/s | 900.9 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 2.706 TFLOPS | 28.83 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 2.706 TFLOPS | 28.83 TFLOPS |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | None | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | N/A |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |

| Release Date | 2024-04-15 | 2026-05-31 |