NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only recorded benchmark in the database is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, and the result is decisive. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5 points, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 scores 2893 points. That puts the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER ahead by 53.9 percent in this workload. In raw terms, the newer card delivers more than double the score of the older, lower-tier model.

Looking at the percentile standings reinforces the gap. The RTX 4010 sits at the 18th percentile among all GPUs in the database, meaning roughly four out of five recorded graphics cards outperform it. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, sits at the 36th percentile, which places it above the median but not in the top tier. The score difference is substantial, yet neither card ranks as a flagship in the database's overall distribution.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 4010 are all within a very tight band. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB averages 2907 points, which is 0.5 percent higher than the RTX 4010. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF averages 2910 points, 0.6 percent higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB averages 2913 points, 0.7 percent higher. The NVIDIA Quadro P600 averages 2923 points, 1 percent higher. These deltas are small enough that the RTX 4010 effectively trades blows with those cards in this specific test, despite being from an older architecture and a lower product tier.

For the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, the nearest rivals cluster around its score as well. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 matches it exactly at 6270 points. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 trails by 0.2 percent at 6282 points. The AMD FirePro W600 sits 0.8 percent behind at 6223 points. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 is 0.9 percent behind at 6327 points. These are all within a narrow margin, so the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is not an outlier among its closest competitors; it sits comfortably in a well-populated performance band.

The head-to-head data shows a single clear winner. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins the only recorded benchmark, and the RTX 4010 records zero wins. The delta of 53.9 percent is not a marginal difference. It is a full performance class gap that separates the two cards in any practical sense.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 4010 uses the GA107 chip built on the Ampere architecture. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip built on Blackwell 2.0. This is a generational leap: Ampere is the GeForce 30-series foundation, while Blackwell 2.0 drives the GeForce 50-series. The RTX 4010 is listed as belonging to the GeForce 40 generation, but its underlying silicon is Ampere, which predates the Ada Lovelace architecture typically associated with the 40-series. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER belongs to the GeForce 50 generation and uses the newer Blackwell 2.0 design.

The manufacturing process differs significantly. The RTX 4010 is fabricated on an 8 nm node at Samsung. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses a 5 nm node at TSMC. The smaller process node allows for much higher transistor density. The RTX 4010 packs 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, which works out to 43.5 million transistors per square millimeter. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER packs 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, which translates to 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter. That is nearly three times the transistor density, and it explains why the newer card can deliver such a large performance advantage despite a die that is not proportionally larger.

Core counts amplify the architectural gap. The RTX 4010 has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The newer card has more than eleven times the shading units, more than eleven times the texture units, and six times the raster output units. Ray tracing cores follow the same pattern: 6 on the RTX 4010 versus 70 on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Tensor cores scale from 24 to 280. Every compute resource is dramatically larger on the newer card.

Clock speeds also favor the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The RTX 4010 has a base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost clock of 1762 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The boost clock alone is nearly 700 MHz higher, which compounds with the massive core count advantage. The result is visible in the raw throughput numbers. The RTX 4010 delivers 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS. That is roughly sixteen times the raw floating-point throughput.

Memory architecture is another major divider. The RTX 4010 uses 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, providing 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The newer card has four times the memory capacity and more than nine times the memory bandwidth. The memory clock also differs: 1500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective on the RTX 4010, versus 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The effective data rate more than doubles.

Output capabilities differ as well. The RTX 4010 uses four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connectors. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API coverage is identical. The bus interface is also different: PCIe 4.0 x8 on the RTX 4010 versus PCIe 5.0 x16 on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The newer card has both a newer PCIe generation and a wider link.

The Verdict

The data points to one obvious conclusion: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is overwhelmingly faster than the RTX 4010. The Steel Nomad score is 53.9 percent higher, and the architectural resources are an order of magnitude larger in nearly every category. The RTX 4010 is a low-power, entry-level card with 50 W TDP, a single-slot design, and no power connectors. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a high-power, dual-slot card with a 350 W TDP and a single 16-pin connector. These are not competing products in the same class; they serve entirely different segments.

The RTX 4010 makes sense for systems where power draw and physical size are paramount. Its 50 W TDP means it can run without supplemental power connectors, and its 163 mm length and 69 mm height fit in compact chassis. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, at 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 48 mm wide, requires a full-size case and a robust power delivery setup. The suggested PSU for the RTX 4010 is 250 W; the database does not list a suggested PSU for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, but the 350 W TDP alone signals a much larger system power requirement.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the correct choice for anyone who needs high frame rates, ray tracing performance, or large memory buffers. The 16 GB GDDR7 frame buffer with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth is suited for modern workloads that exceed the 4 GB capacity and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth of the RTX 4010. The RTX 4010 is suited for basic display output, light productivity, or legacy workloads where its modest resources are sufficient.

Neither card is a benchmark champion in the absolute sense. The RTX 4010 ranks at the 18th percentile, and the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER ranks at the 36th percentile. The newer card is clearly the stronger performer, but the database shows both sit below the top echelon of recorded GPUs. Buyers should align their choice with the workload, not with marketing tiers.

Specification Differences

| Specification | RTX 4010 | RTX 5070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process node | 8 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Samsung | TSMC |

| Transistors | 8,700 million | 45,600 million |

| Die size | 200 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Transistor density | 43.5M / mm² | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base clock | 1417 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost clock | 1762 MHz | 2452 MHz |

| Memory clock | 1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 4 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 768 | 8960 |

| Texture mapping units | 24 | 280 |

| Raster output units | 16 | 96 |

| Ray tracing cores | 6 | 70 |

| Tensor cores | 24 | 280 |

| Pixel rate | 28.19 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 42.29 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 performance | 2.706 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |

| FP16 performance | 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1) | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 50 W | 350 W |

| Slot width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | Not listed |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Length | 163 mm (6.4 inches) | 304 mm (12 inches) |

| Height | 69 mm (2.7 inches) | 137 mm (5.4 inches) |

| Width | Not listed | 48 mm (1.9 inches) |

| Release date | 2024-04-15 | 2025-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | 749 USD |

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 scores 2893. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER leads by 53.9 percent.

Q: How do these cards compare to their nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4010 is within 1 percent of several cards, including the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (0.5 percent higher), RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (0.6 percent higher), RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (0.7 percent higher), and Quadro P600 (1 percent higher). The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is essentially tied with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at 0 percent delta, with the Quadro K620 0.2 percent lower, the FirePro W600 0.8 percent lower, and the Radeon R7 M350 0.9 percent lower.

Q: What memory specifications do the two cards use?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The RTX 4010 has a 50 W TDP, uses no power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 250 W. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP and uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Do these cards support the same APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which card is larger physically?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is larger in every dimension: 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 48 mm wide, compared to the RTX 4010 at 163 mm long and 69 mm high. The RTX 4010 is single-slot, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is dual-slot.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins the only recorded benchmark outright, and it wins by a massive margin. Its 6269.5 score versus 2893 represents a 53.9 percent advantage. That alone settles any general-purpose performance comparison. The card also wins on every architectural metric that matters for compute-heavy workloads: shading units, texture units, raster units, ray tracing cores, tensor cores, FP32 throughput, and memory bandwidth. For gaming at high resolutions, ray tracing workloads, or any task that benefits from large memory capacity, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the clear choice.

The RTX 4010 wins in areas that are not captured by the benchmark score. Its 50 W TDP is dramatically lower than the 350 W TDP of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. It requires no power connectors, so it can fit into systems with minimal power delivery. Its single-slot design and short 163 mm length make it suitable for small form factor builds where the 304 mm length and 48 mm width of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER would not fit. The RTX 4010 also uses four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, which may be preferable in multi-monitor setups that rely on that connector type.

The RTX 4010's nearest rivals are all within 1 percent of its score, which indicates it performs at a consistent level with other entry-level cards. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's nearest rivals are also tightly clustered, with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 matching it exactly. This suggests both cards are well-positioned within their respective performance tiers, even though those tiers are far apart.

For a builder prioritizing low power consumption, minimal physical footprint, and basic display capabilities, the RTX 4010 is the sensible option. For a builder prioritizing raw performance, modern memory technology, and the capacity to handle demanding workloads, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only choice between the two. The data does not support any scenario where the RTX 4010 outperforms the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER in compute tasks; the 53.9 percent delta is the definitive separator.