NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

CORE STATE GB205
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1447 MHz
TDP 60 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,893
N/A
geekbench_opencl
N/A
143,870
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
139,213
passmark_directx_10
N/A
151
passmark_directx_11
N/A
237
passmark_directx_12
N/A
102
passmark_directx_9
N/A
259
passmark_g2d
N/A
981
passmark_g3d
N/A
24,004
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
10,101

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains only a single measured result for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scores 2,893 points. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has no overlapping 3DMark Steel Nomad result; its recorded benchmark suite consists of Geekbench and Passmark workloads. Direct head-to-head comparisons across identical test conditions are therefore limited, but the available data still allows for a meaningful performance positioning analysis.

The RTX 4010’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,893 places it within a tight cluster of near-identical performers. The nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2,907 (0.5% ahead), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF at 2,910 (0.6% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB at 2,913 (0.7% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro P600 at 2,923 (1% ahead). The RTX 4010 trails the best of these rivals by only 1%, a margin that falls within typical run-to-run variance for synthetic workloads. This result indicates that the RTX 4010 delivers performance nearly identical to those desktop-oriented cards in this specific DX12 test, despite its drastically lower power envelope.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, by contrast, holds a database percentile of 80 among all GPUs, while the RTX 4010 sits at only the 18th percentile. The average benchmark score for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 35,435, which is 12.2 times higher than the RTX 4010’s single recorded average of 2,893. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 at 35,520 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro Duo at 35,860 (1.2% ahead), the NVIDIA A2 at 34,690 (2.1% behind), and the NVIDIA T1000 at 36,289 (2.4% ahead). The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits within 2.4% of all four of these rivals, showing it competes directly with much larger workstation and prosumer cards that draw substantially more power.

Within the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s own benchmark suite, the Passmark G3D score of 24,004 dominates its other results, while the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 102 and DirectX 10 score of 151 are notably low. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 143,870 and Vulkan score of 139,213 are both strong, indicating that the card’s compute and modern API performance is robust. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 10,101 further confirms that general compute workloads run far ahead of the legacy DirectX 9/10/11/12 rasterization tests, which return scores of 259, 151, 237, and 102 respectively. This pattern suggests that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s architectural strengths are concentrated in newer API paths and compute tasks, rather than older fixed-function pipeline stages.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4010 wins in the narrow but important category of low-power desktop integration. Its 50 W TDP, single-slot form factor, and lack of any power connectors make it suitable for systems with a suggested 250 W power supply. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, in contrast, is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) package with a 60 W TDP, also requiring no power connectors, but it is designed for portable devices where the display outputs are dependent on the host platform. The RTX 4010 provides four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs directly, making it a self-contained display solution, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s display outputs are listed as “Portable Device Dependent,” meaning the laptop manufacturer controls connectivity.

In raw compute throughput, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins decisively. Its FP32 performance of 17.04 TFLOPS is 6.3 times the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS. The pixel rate of 115.8 GPixel/s versus 28.19 GPixel/s represents a 4.1-fold advantage, and the texture rate of 266.2 GTexel/s versus 42.29 GTexel/s is a 6.3-fold advantage. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also carries 6,144 more shading units (5,888 versus 768), 160 more texture mapping units (184 versus 24), and 64 more ROPs (80 versus 16). Every measured throughput metric in the database favors the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile by a wide margin.

The RTX 4010 wins on the basis of its 18th percentile versus the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 80th percentile only in the sense that it is a much simpler product. It uses an 8 nm process node from Samsung with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses a 5 nm TSMC node with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The RTX 4010’s transistor density is 43.5 million per mm², while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile achieves 118.3 million per mm². This means the RTX 4010 is a smaller, older, and less dense chip, but that also makes it easier to cool in a single-slot form factor with no auxiliary power.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 4010 is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA107 chip, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB205 chip. The RTX 4010 belongs to the GeForce 40-series generation, and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile belongs to the GeForce 50 Mobile generation. The manufacturing processes differ substantially: the RTX 4010 uses an 8 nm Samsung process, and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses a 5 nm TSMC process. The RTX 4010’s predecessor is the GeForce 30 series and its successor is the GeForce 50 series, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s predecessor is the GeForce 40 Mobile series and it has no successor listed.

The RTX 4010 has 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. This is a 7.7-fold increase in RT cores and a 7.7-fold increase in tensor cores. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so the API feature set is identical on paper. The RTX 4010’s FP16 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to FP32, and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s FP16 is also 17.04 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to FP32.

The clock behavior differs significantly. The RTX 4010 has a base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost clock of 1762 MHz, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a base clock of 847 MHz and a boost clock of 1447 MHz. Despite the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s lower clocks, its massive parallel resource count (5,888 shading units versus 768) more than compensates, yielding the 6.3-fold FP32 advantage. The memory clock also differs: the RTX 4010 runs at 1500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective GDDR6, and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective GDDR7.

Specification Differences

The memory configuration is one of the largest gaps. The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. That is a 7-fold increase in bandwidth and a 3-fold increase in capacity. The bus interface also differs: the RTX 4010 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16.

The physical form factors are opposite. The RTX 4010 is a single-slot card with dimensions of 163 mm length and 69 mm height, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an IGP with no listed dimensions. The RTX 4010 has a TDP of 50 W and a suggested power supply of 250 W, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W and no suggested PSU listed. Neither card requires power connectors. The RTX 4010 offers four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s display outputs are dependent on the portable device.

The transistor counts are 8,700 million for the RTX 4010 and 31,100 million for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, a 3.6-fold difference. The die sizes are 200 mm² and 263 mm² respectively, a 1.3-fold difference. The transistor density of 43.5M per mm² for the RTX 4010 versus 118.3M per mm² for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile reflects the process node advantage of the 5 nm TSMC node over the 8 nm Samsung node. The release dates are April 15, 2024 for the RTX 4010 and February 28, 2025 for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 17.04 TFLOPS FP32, which is 6.3 times the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS.

Q: How do their memory bandwidths compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 672.0 GB/s bandwidth across a 192-bit GDDR7 bus, versus the RTX 4010’s 96.00 GB/s across a 64-bit GDDR6 bus. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile provides 7 times the bandwidth.

Q: What is the percentile ranking difference?

A: The RTX 4010 ranks at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile ranks at the 80th percentile.

Q: Do they support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What are the TDP values?

A: The RTX 4010 has a TDP of 50 W, and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W. Neither requires power connectors.

Q: How do their nearest rival scores compare?

A: The RTX 4010’s closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2,907, which is 0.5% ahead. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s closest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 at 35,520, which is 0.2% ahead.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 4010
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
5,888 +666.7%
Shaders
768
5,888 +666.7%
TMUs
24
184 +666.7%
ROPs
16
80 +400.0%
SM Count
6
46 +666.7%
Clocks
Base Clock
1417 MHz
847 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1447 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
12,288 +200.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
64 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
96.00 GB/s
672.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
115.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
266.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
2.706 TFLOPS
17.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)
266.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)
17.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
46 +666.7%
Tensor Cores
24
184 +666.7%
Power
TDP
50 W
60 W
TDP (W)
50
60 +20.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
—
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
GA107
GB205
Generation
GeForce 40
GeForce 50 Mobile
Process Size
8 nm
5 nm
Transistors
8,700 million
31,100 million
Die Size
200 mm²
263 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
TSMC
Density
43.5M / mm²
118.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
12.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
IGP
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
—
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
—
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 30
GeForce 40 Mobile
Successor
GeForce 50
—
View GeForce RTX 4010 Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Details