NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data includes two direct benchmark comparisons between the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. The results are decisive in favor of the RTX 3070, which wins both tests. The largest margin appears in Geekbench OpenCL, where the RTX 3070 scores 112821 against the Quadro K5200's 19024. That represents an 83.1% advantage for the newer card, a massive gap that reflects the generational leap between the two architectures.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the margin narrows considerably. The RTX 3070 scores 21022, while the Quadro K5200 posts 20180. The delta here is only 4%, making this a much closer contest. The Vulkan result suggests that the Quadro K5200, despite its age, retains competitive driver-level performance in this particular API. Still, the RTX 3070 wins outright, giving it a clean 2-0 record in the head-to-head comparison.

Looking at the broader database averages, the picture becomes more nuanced. The Quadro K5200 has an average benchmark score of 19602, while the RTX 3070 averages 17208. That is a notable inversion: the older professional card actually holds a higher aggregate score across all recorded benchmarks, even though it loses both direct comparisons. This discrepancy stems from the benchmark mix. The RTX 3070's average is pulled down by several low scores in Passmark tests, including a DirectX 12 result of 85 and a DirectX 10 result of 150. The Quadro K5200, by contrast, only has two benchmark entries in the database, both of which are competitive.

The percentile rankings reinforce this split. The Quadro K5200 sits at the 64th percentile against all GPUs, while the RTX 3070 lands at the 61st percentile. Despite the RTX 3070's overwhelming OpenCL win, the aggregate data places the Quadro slightly higher in the overall distribution. This is a reminder that raw compute benchmarks do not always align with average scores across diverse test suites.

For the nearest rivals, the Quadro K5200's closest competitor is the AMD FirePro D300, which averages 19637, a 0.2% edge over the Quadro. The Radeon RX 6650 XT sits 0.8% ahead at 19765, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX trails by 1% at 19410. The GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is 1.4% behind at 19334. These are tight margins, indicating that the Quadro K5200 occupies a narrow performance band relative to its immediate peers.

The RTX 3070's nearest rivals tell a different story. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT leads by 0.7% with a score of 17083. The GeForce GTX 690 is 1% ahead at 17037, and the Radeon HD 7970M is 1.1% ahead at 17019. The NVIDIA Tesla K40c trails the RTX 3070 by 1.5% with a score of 17468. These deltas are all small, clustering the RTX 3070 in a dense competitive field.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear choice for anyone prioritizing raw compute throughput: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. Its OpenCL score of 112821 dwarfs the Quadro K5200's 19024, a 5.9x advantage in raw numbers. The RTX 3070 also wins the Vulkan test, albeit by a slim 4% margin. For modern workloads that leverage OpenCL heavily, the RTX 3070 is the superior option by a wide margin.

However, the Quadro K5200 is not without merit. Its average benchmark score of 19602 exceeds the RTX 3070's 17208 by roughly 14%. This is driven by the RTX 3070's weak Passmark DirectX results, particularly the DirectX 12 score of 85 and DirectX 9 score of 247. The Quadro K5200 has no such weak entries in the database, which boosts its aggregate standing. Users who rely on the exact benchmarks present in the database may find the Quadro more consistent across the board.

The percentile rankings favor the Quadro K5200 as well, with a 64th percentile placement versus the RTX 3070's 61st. This suggests that, in the context of all GPUs tracked by the database, the Quadro holds a slightly higher relative position. That is a meaningful signal for professional users who care about overall standing rather than a single test.

For most modern applications, the RTX 3070 is the pragmatic pick. It delivers far higher compute performance in the OpenCL test, which is the more demanding workload in this comparison. The Vulkan win, though narrow, still favors it. The Quadro K5200's higher average score is an artifact of its limited benchmark entries and the RTX 3070's unusually low Passmark results, which may not reflect real-world gaming or compute scenarios.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 3070 wins decisively in OpenCL compute. Its score of 112821 against 19024 is the single largest margin in the entire comparison. Any workload that scales with OpenCL, such as physics simulation, image processing, or general-purpose GPU compute, will see a dramatic advantage from the RTX 3070. This is the headline win.

The RTX 3070 also edges out the Quadro K5200 in Vulkan, scoring 21022 versus 20180. The 4% delta is small but consistent. Vulkan-based applications, including many modern games and some rendering engines, will run slightly faster on the RTX 3070. The difference is unlikely to be transformative, but it is measurable.

The Quadro K5200 wins on aggregate average score. Its 19602 average beats the RTX 3070's 17208. This is not a single-test victory but a cumulative one, driven by the RTX 3070's poor Passmark DirectX 12 and DirectX 10 scores. For users who put weight on the overall benchmark average rather than individual tests, the Quadro K5200 comes out ahead.

The Quadro K5200 also holds the higher percentile ranking at 64 versus 61. This is a subtle but real advantage in the database's global GPU hierarchy. It indicates that the Quadro sits above a larger proportion of tracked GPUs than the RTX 3070 does.

In terms of nearest rival positioning, the Quadro K5200's closest competitors are all within 1.4% of its score. This suggests a stable, mid-pack performance level. The RTX 3070's rivals are similarly clustered, with deltas under 1.5%. Neither card dominates its immediate competitive set, but the RTX 3070's OpenCL outlier pushes it far beyond the Quadro in that specific test.

FAQ

Q: Which card performs better in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is far ahead, scoring 112821 compared to the Quadro K5200's 19024. The RTX 3070 leads by 83.1% in this test.

Q: Is the Quadro K5200 competitive in Vulkan?

A: Yes, it is close. The Quadro K5200 scores 20180 in Geekbench Vulkan, while the RTX 3070 scores 21022. The RTX 3070 wins, but only by 4%.

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Quadro K5200 has a higher average, at 19602, versus the RTX 3070's 17208. This is despite the RTX 3070 winning both direct head-to-head tests.

Q: How do the percentile rankings compare?

A: The Quadro K5200 sits at the 64th percentile against all GPUs, while the RTX 3070 is at the 61st percentile. The Quadro holds a slightly higher relative position.

Q: What is the closest rival to the RTX 3070?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the nearest rival, with an average score of 17083, which is 0.7% higher than the RTX 3070's 17208.

Q: Does the Quadro K5200 have any benchmark wins over the RTX 3070?

A: No. In the two recorded head-to-head tests, the RTX 3070 wins both. The Quadro K5200's advantage only appears in the aggregate average score and percentile ranking.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different eras and use fundamentally different designs. The Quadro K5200 is built on the Kepler architecture, specifically the GK110B chip, using a 28 nm process from TSMC. It packs 7,080 million transistors on a 561 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 12.6 million per square millimeter. The RTX 3070 uses the Ampere architecture with the GA104 chip, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm node. It contains 17,400 million transistors on a smaller 392 mm² die, yielding a much higher density of 44.4 million per square millimeter.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The Quadro K5200 has a base clock of 667 MHz and a boost clock of 771 MHz. The RTX 3070 operates at a 1500 MHz base and 1725 MHz boost. Memory clocks also diverge: the Quadro runs at 1502 MHz with 6 Gbps effective, while the RTX 3070 runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective.

Memory configurations are similar in capacity but not in speed. Both cards have 8 GB of VRAM on a 256-bit bus. The Quadro K5200 uses GDDR5 with a bandwidth of 192.3 GB/s. The RTX 3070 uses GDDR6 and achieves 448.0 GB/s, more than double the Quadro's bandwidth.

Compute resources favor the RTX 3070 heavily. It has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The Quadro K5200 has 2304 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The RTX 3070 also includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, features entirely absent from the Kepler-based Quadro. Pixel rate is 165.6 GPixel/s for the RTX 3070 versus 37.01 GPixel/s for the Quadro. Texture rate is 317.4 GTexel/s versus 148.0 GTexel/s.

Floating-point performance shows the greatest gap. The RTX 3070 delivers 20.31 TFLOPS in FP32 and the same in FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The Quadro K5200 manages 3.553 TFLOPS in FP32 and has no listed FP16 capability. This is a raw compute advantage of nearly 6x for the RTX 3070.

Power and interface specifications also differ. The Quadro K5200 has a 150 W TDP with a single 6-pin power connector and a suggested 450 W power supply. The RTX 3070 has a 220 W TDP, a single 12-pin connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU. The Quadro uses PCIe 3.0 x16, while the RTX 3070 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are legacy on the Quadro, with 2x DVI and 2x DisplayPort 1.2. The RTX 3070 offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

API support reflects the newer architecture. The RTX 3070 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4. The Quadro K5200 is limited to DirectX 12 (11_1) and Vulkan 1.2.175. Both support OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 3070 also has a listed launch MSRP of 499 USD, while the Quadro K5200 has no recorded launch price. The Quadro measures 267 mm in length and 111 mm in height, while the RTX 3070 is shorter at 242 mm and nearly identical in height at 112 mm. Both are dual-slot cards.