NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a clear split between these two NVIDIA offerings. Across the nine benchmark comparisons, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti claims eight wins, while the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 takes a single, albeit significant, victory. The most decisive result for the Quadro GV100 comes in the Geekbench OpenCL test, where it scores 150,004 against the RTX 3070 Ti's 119,718. This represents a 25.3% advantage for the older professional card, indicating a substantial lead in a compute-oriented workload that leverages its architecture's strengths.

The RTX 3070 Ti's wins are consistent but vary in magnitude. The narrowest margin is in Geekbench Vulkan, where the RTX 3070 Ti scores 139,541 versus the GV100's 139,526. The delta is recorded as 0%, making this effectively a tie, though the database credits the win to the newer card. Beyond this, the RTX 3070 Ti's victories are more pronounced. In Passmark's DirectX suite, it leads by 9.7% in DirectX 10 (155 vs. 140), 12.5% in DirectX 11 (192 vs. 168), and 7.7% in DirectX 12 (91 vs. 84). The largest gap in the DirectX tests is in DirectX 9, where the RTX 3070 Ti scores 261 against the GV100's 207, a 20.7% difference.

The synthetic gaming and graphics tests further favor the RTX 3070 Ti. In Passmark G3D, a general indicator of 3D rendering performance, the RTX 3070 Ti scores 23,356, which is 15.9% higher than the GV100's 19,650. The Passmark G2D test shows a 20.8% lead for the RTX 3070 Ti (1,055 vs. 836), and the Passmark GPU Compute test reveals a 21.8% advantage (11,601 vs. 9,069). These results indicate that while the Quadro GV100 holds a commanding lead in a specific compute benchmark like OpenCL, the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is consistently faster across a broader spectrum of DirectX, 2D, and general compute workloads.

When placed in the context of the overall database, the average benchmark scores tell a complementary story. The Quadro GV100 has an average benchmark score of 35,520, which places it at the 80th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, which scores 35,435 (a 0.2% difference). In contrast, the RTX 3070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 29,945, placing it at the 75th percentile. Its closest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, with a score of 29,928 (a 0.1% difference). This suggests that the GV100's overall average is skewed by its exceptional OpenCL performance, while the RTX 3070 Ti's average reflects more consistent strength across many tests.

The Verdict

The data dictates a straightforward conclusion for different use cases. For users prioritizing raw compute throughput in applications that utilize OpenCL, the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 is the clear choice. Its 25.3% lead in the Geekbench OpenCL test is a decisive factor, and its 32 GB of HBM2 memory alongside a 4096-bit bus provides a massive memory subsystem. The Quadro GV100's launch MSRP was 8,999 USD.

For virtually every other scenario, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the superior option based on the recorded benchmarks. Its wins in DirectX 10, 11, and 12, along with its substantial leads in Passmark G3D and GPU Compute, show that it is more adept at handling contemporary graphics APIs and general-purpose compute tasks. The RTX 3070 Ti's launch MSRP was 599 USD.

The choice is not about which card is "better" overall, but which is better for the specific workload. The Quadro GV100, with its Volta architecture and focus on HBM2 memory, is optimized for professional compute tasks that benefit from its unique memory configuration and tensor core count. The RTX 3070 Ti, with its Ampere architecture, is a more balanced card that excels in gaming and standard graphics workloads, as evidenced by its higher scores in the DirectX and 3DMark tests. The data shows that the RTX 3070 Ti is the more versatile performer, while the GV100 is a specialized tool with a single, powerful advantage.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro GV100 has a higher average benchmark score of 35,520, compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti's 29,945.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti perform in DirectX 12 compared to the GV100?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti scores 91 in the Passmark DirectX 12 test, which is 7.7% higher than the GV100's score of 84.

Q: What is the performance difference in the Geekbench Vulkan test?

A: The scores are nearly identical, with the RTX 3070 Ti at 139,541 and the GV100 at 139,526. The recorded delta is 0%.

Q: Which GPU has a larger memory bus width?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro GV100 has a 4096-bit memory bus, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti has a 256-bit bus.

Q: In which benchmark does the Quadro GV100 outperform the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The Quadro GV100 wins in the Geekbench OpenCL test, scoring 150,004 versus 119,718, a 25.3% advantage.

Q: What are the DirectX feature levels supported by each GPU?

A: The Quadro GV100 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the RTX 3070 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every core specification. The Quadro GV100 is built on a 12 nm process at TSMC, while the RTX 3070 Ti uses an 8 nm process at Samsung. The GV100 has a larger die at 815 mm² and contains 21,100 million transistors, whereas the RTX 3070 Ti's die is 392 mm² with 17,400 million transistors. This results in a different transistor density: 25.9M per mm² for the GV100 and 44.4M per mm² for the RTX 3070 Ti.

Clock speeds also differ significantly. The Quadro GV100 has a base clock of 1132 MHz and a boost clock of 1627 MHz. The RTX 3070 Ti operates at a higher base clock of 1575 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz. Memory configurations are starkly different: the GV100 offers 32 GB of HBM2 on a 4096-bit bus, delivering 868.4 GB/s of bandwidth, while the RTX 3070 Ti provides 8 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth.

The compute and rendering pipelines diverge as well. The Quadro GV100 has 5120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, while the RTX 3070 Ti has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The GV100 features 640 tensor cores and no dedicated RT cores, whereas the RTX 3070 Ti has 192 tensor cores and 48 RT cores. Power consumption is higher on the RTX 3070 Ti at 290 W versus the GV100's 250 W. The bus interface also differs: the GV100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16, and the RTX 3070 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are another point of difference, with the GV100 offering 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and the RTX 3070 Ti offering 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is fundamental. The Quadro GV100 is based on the Volta architecture, while the RTX 3070 Ti is based on Ampere. This is reflected in their respective generations: the GV100 belongs to the Quadro Volta (Vx000) series, and the RTX 3070 Ti belongs to the GeForce 30-series.

Process technology and foundry differ, with the GV100 using TSMC's 12 nm node and the RTX 3070 Ti using Samsung's 8 nm node. The GV100's larger transistor count and die size are characteristic of a high-performance compute chip, while the RTX 3070 Ti's denser packing on a smaller die indicates a more modern, efficiency-focused design.

The memory architecture is a major differentiator. The GV100's HBM2 memory with a 4096-bit bus is a hallmark of professional compute cards, designed for massive data throughput. The RTX 3070 Ti's GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus is a gaming-oriented solution that is faster per clock but offers less total capacity and bandwidth.

Feature sets also diverge. The RTX 3070 Ti includes dedicated RT cores for ray tracing and a higher number of tensor cores (192) relative to its shading units, supporting its DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) feature level. The GV100, with its 640 tensor cores and no RT cores, is tuned for AI and scientific compute, but its older DirectX 12 (12_1) support reflects its professional focus. The FP32 and FP16 compute throughputs also reveal their different natures: the GV100 offers 16.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 33.32 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), while the RTX 3070 Ti offers 21.75 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1). This indicates the RTX 3070 Ti's shader units are more general-purpose, whereas the GV100's architecture can double FP16 rate for specialized workloads.