NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared benchmark results for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The RTX 3050 A Mobile has recorded scores across eight tests, while the LX PRO has no benchmark entries in the database. This absence of overlapping measurements prevents a direct numerical comparison of the two GPUs.

For the RTX 3050 A Mobile, the recorded data shows a Geekbench OpenCL score of 52998, a Passmark G3D score of 11664, and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 4419. Its Passmark DirectX scores are 152 for DirectX 9, 94 for DirectX 11, 61 for DirectX 10, and 55 for DirectX 12. The G2D score is 526. The average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 8746, placing the GPU at the 44th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

The nearest rivals to the RTX 3050 A Mobile, based on average benchmark scores, include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 with an average score of 8743 and a delta of 0 percent, the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 at 8686 with a delta of 0.7 percent, the AMD Radeon R9 M265X at 8851 with a delta of -1.2 percent, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 at 8863 with a delta of -1.3 percent. These deltas are all within 1.3 percent of the RTX 3050 A Mobile's average, indicating that the GPU sits in a tightly contested performance band. The RTX 3050 A Mobile trails the Radeon R9 M265X by 1.2 percent and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 by 1.3 percent, while it leads the GTX 460 v2 by a negligible margin and the Quadro P2200 by 0.7 percent.

The LX PRO carries a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database, but its average benchmark score is recorded as 0 due to the lack of test data. Without measurements, the percentile ranking cannot be substantiated by actual performance results. The RTX 3050 A Mobile, by contrast, has concrete scores that place it at the 44th percentile, a ranking derived from its recorded performance.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 3050 A Mobile demonstrates its strengths in legacy DirectX workloads. Its Passmark DirectX 9 score of 152 is the highest among its DirectX results, and the DirectX 11 score of 94 outperforms the DirectX 10 score of 61 and the DirectX 12 score of 55. The data indicates that this GPU handles older API workloads more efficiently than newer ones. The G2D score of 526, which measures 2D graphics performance, also represents a strong result relative to the GPU's overall profile.

The LX PRO has no benchmark results in the database, so no wins can be attributed to it based on recorded measurements. Its specifications suggest capability in compute-heavy tasks, as the FP32 throughput is listed at 24.58 TFLOPS and FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, but without benchmark scores, these figures remain unverified in actual performance.

For use-case analysis, the RTX 3050 A Mobile's data points to suitability for applications relying on DirectX 9 or DirectX 11 rendering, where its recorded scores are relatively higher. The LX PRO, based on its specification sheet, appears oriented toward high-throughput compute and modern graphics workloads, given its larger memory pool and higher texture and pixel rates, but the database provides no measured confirmation.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile uses the GA106 chip built on the Ampere architecture, fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung. The die contains 12,000 million transistors across a 276 mm² area, resulting in a transistor density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. The architecture includes 1792 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, 32 raster output units, 14 ray tracing cores, and 56 tensor cores. The FP32 and FP16 performance are both listed at 4.813 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, indicating that the GPU does not double FP16 throughput.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip built on a TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, with no transistor density provided. The GPU includes 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, but no ray tracing cores or tensor cores are listed. The FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, showing a doubling of FP16 performance over FP32.

The process node difference is notable: the LX PRO uses a smaller 6 nm process from TSMC, while the RTX 3050 A Mobile uses an 8 nm process from Samsung. The LX PRO's architecture provides a significantly higher shading unit count at 6144 versus 1792, and its FP32 throughput is over five times that of the RTX 3050 A Mobile based on the listed figures. The RTX 3050 A Mobile includes dedicated ray tracing and tensor cores, features absent from the LX PRO's specification list.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every major specification category. The RTX 3050 A Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The LX PRO offers six times the memory capacity and more than double the bandwidth.

The base and boost clocks differ as well. The RTX 3050 A Mobile operates at a base clock of 1065 MHz and a boost clock of 1343 MHz. The LX PRO lists no base or boost clocks in the database, leaving its operating frequencies unspecified.

The power characteristics are substantially different. The RTX 3050 A Mobile has a TDP of 45 W and uses no power connectors, fitting an integrated graphics processor form factor with an IGP slot width. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and is a dual-slot card. The LX PRO also lists a suggested PSU of 550 W, while the RTX 3050 A Mobile has no suggested PSU listed.

The bus interface differs: the RTX 3050 A Mobile uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs also vary, with the RTX 3050 A Mobile described as portable device dependent and the LX PRO offering four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The LX PRO has physical dimensions of 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, whereas the RTX 3050 A Mobile has no dimensions listed.

The production status and release dates differ. The RTX 3050 A Mobile is marked as end-of-life and was released on 2023-12-31, with its predecessor listed as GeForce 20 Mobile. The LX PRO is marked as active and has a release date of 2026-03-16, with no predecessor listed. The RTX 3050 A Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3; both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

FAQ

Q: How does the RTX 3050 A Mobile compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 3050 A Mobile has an average benchmark score of 8746. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2, scores 8743 with a delta of 0 percent. The NVIDIA Quadro P2200 scores 8686 with a delta of 0.7 percent, the AMD Radeon R9 M265X scores 8851 with a delta of -1.2 percent, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 scores 8863 with a delta of -1.3 percent.

Q: What benchmark results are available for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO?

A: The database contains no benchmark entries for the LX PRO. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 throughput according to the database?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO lists FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile lists FP32 throughput of 4.813 TFLOPS. The LX PRO's FP32 figure is roughly five times higher.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each GPU?

A: The RTX 3050 A Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same API versions?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 3050 A Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What is the power requirement difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 3050 A Mobile has a TDP of 45 W and uses no power connectors. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and lists a suggested PSU of 550 W.