NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

The Verdict

The data separates these two mobile GPUs into entirely different performance classes. The RTX 3050 A Mobile is an entry-level Ampere part built for thin, power-limited laptops, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a high-end Blackwell 2.0 chip designed for desktop-class performance in large gaming machines. Benchmark results confirm a massive gap: the 3050 A scores 11,664 in PassMark G3D and 52,998 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the 5070 Ti SUPER records 6,269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. These are not directly comparable tests, but the architectural differences make the outcome obvious.

The RTX 3050 A Mobile suits users who need a capable IGP-class GPU in a portable chassis. Its 45 W TDP, IGP slot width, and lack of power connectors mean it fits into slim notebooks where discrete power delivery is impossible. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, with its 350 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, and 16-pin connector, belongs in a large, high-performance laptop that can dissipate serious heat. Buyers choosing between these two are really choosing between a lightweight productivity machine and a heavy gaming rig.

The 5070 Ti SUPER dominates in every measurable specification. It has 8,960 shading units versus 1,792, 280 texture mapping units versus 56, 96 raster output units versus 32, and 70 RT cores versus 14. Its FP32 compute of 43.94 TFLOPS is roughly nine times the 4.813 TFLOPS of the 3050 A. Memory capacity jumps from 4 GB GDDR6 to 16 GB GDDR7, with bandwidth increasing from 192.0 GB/s to 896.0 GB/s. The verdict is clear: the 5070 Ti SUPER is for demanding gaming and creative workloads, while the 3050 A handles light gaming and general productivity.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 3050 A Mobile uses the GA106 chip built on Samsung's 8 nm process. It packs 12,000 million transistors into a 276 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. This is an Ampere-generation part from the GeForce 30-series, released in early 2024. Its predecessor is the GeForce 20 Mobile series, and it is now marked end-of-life.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die contains 45,600 million transistors across 378 mm², giving a density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. This is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture part from the GeForce 50-generation, released in early 2026. It remains in active production.

The process node difference is significant. Samsung's 8 nm node is older and less dense than TSMC's 5 nm node, which explains the transistor density gap. The 5070 Ti SUPER fits nearly four times as many transistors into only 37% more die area. This density advantage translates directly into higher clock speeds: the 5070 Ti SUPER boosts to 2,452 MHz versus 1,343 MHz for the 3050 A.

Memory technology also differs sharply. The 3050 A uses GDDR6 at 12 Gbps effective on a 128-bit bus, while the 5070 Ti SUPER uses GDDR7 at 28 Gbps effective on a 256-bit bus. The newer memory standard and wider bus give the 5070 Ti SUPER a 4.67x bandwidth advantage. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but the 5070 Ti SUPER adds DisplayPort 2.1b outputs and PCIe 5.0 x16 connectivity.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16, compared to 4.813 TFLOPS for the RTX 3050 A Mobile. That is approximately 9.1 times the compute throughput.

Q: How much memory do these GPUs have?

A: The RTX 3050 A Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The RTX 3050 A Mobile consumes 45 W and requires no external power connectors, making it suitable for IGP-class notebooks. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER consumes 350 W and requires a 16-pin power connector, indicating a large, high-performance laptop chassis.

Q: How do their benchmark scores compare?

A: The RTX 3050 A Mobile scores 11,664 in PassMark G3D and 52,998 in Geekbench OpenCL. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6,269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. These tests measure different workloads, so direct comparison is not possible, but the average benchmark score of 8,746 for the 3050 A versus 6,270 for the 5070 Ti SUPER reflects their positioning in different test suites.

Q: Which GPU has better ray tracing hardware?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 70 RT cores, five times the 14 RT cores in the RTX 3050 A Mobile. This gives it substantially more capacity for hardware-accelerated ray tracing workloads.

Q: What is the physical size difference?

A: The RTX 3050 A Mobile is IGP-class with no specified dimensions and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is dual-slot, measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, with 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The RTX 3050 A Mobile uses the GA106 chip on Samsung's 8 nm process, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process. Transistor count jumps from 12,000 million to 45,600 million, and die size grows from 276 mm² to 378 mm². Transistor density improves from 43.5M per mm² to 120.6M per mm².

Clock speeds are markedly different. The 3050 A runs at 1,065 MHz base and 1,343 MHz boost, with memory at 1,500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The 5070 Ti SUPER runs at 2,295 MHz base and 2,452 MHz boost, with memory at 1,750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The boost clock advantage alone is 1,109 MHz, or 82.6% higher.

Memory configuration shows a generational leap. The 3050 A has 4 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. That is four times the capacity and 4.67 times the bandwidth.

Compute resources scale proportionally. Shading units go from 1,792 to 8,960 (5x), TMUs from 56 to 280 (5x), ROPs from 32 to 96 (3x), RT cores from 14 to 70 (5x), and tensor cores from 56 to 280 (5x). Pixel rate increases from 42.98 GPixel/s to 235.4 GPixel/s, and texture rate from 75.21 GTexel/s to 686.6 GTexel/s.

Power and physical requirements differ fundamentally. The 3050 A draws 45 W, uses no power connectors, and is IGP-class. The 5070 Ti SUPER draws 350 W, requires a 16-pin connector, and is dual-slot with dimensions of 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm. Bus interface also advances from PCIe 4.0 x8 to PCIe 5.0 x16. The 3050 A is end-of-life, while the 5070 Ti SUPER is active production.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no overlapping benchmark tests for these two GPUs, so direct head-to-head scores are unavailable. The RTX 3050 A Mobile has results across multiple PassMark tests and Geekbench OpenCL, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result. This reflects their different market positioning: the 3050 A targets older, lighter workloads, while the 5070 Ti SUPER is validated against modern DX12 gaming.

The RTX 3050 A Mobile's PassMark scores show its strengths in legacy APIs. It scores 152 in DirectX 9, 94 in DirectX 11, 61 in DirectX 10, and 55 in DirectX 12. Its PassMark G2D score is 526, and its G3D score is 11,664. The GPU compute score is 4,419. These numbers position it as a capable entry-level part for older games and 2D desktop work.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,269.5 places it in a different league entirely. Its nearest rivals in the database include the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at the same score (0% delta), the Quadro K620 at 6,282 (-0.2%), the FirePro W600 at 6,223 (+0.8%), and the Radeon R7 M350 at 6,327 (-0.9%). These tight deltas suggest the 5070 Ti SUPER sits in a narrow performance band among its immediate peers.

The RTX 3050 A Mobile's nearest rivals tell a similar story for its class. The GTX 460 v2 scores 8,743 (0% delta), the Quadro P2200 scores 8,686 (+0.7%), the Radeon R9 M265X scores 8,851 (-1.2%), and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 scores 8,863 (-1.3%). The 3050 A's average benchmark score of 8,746 places it at the 44th percentile of all GPUs, while the 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile with an average of 6,270.

The percentile rankings are counterintuitive given the specification gap. The 3050 A's 44th percentile reflects its strong performance in legacy PassMark tests, which are less demanding and favor its 4 GB memory footprint. The 5070 Ti SUPER's 36th percentile stems from its single modern DX12 benchmark result, which is a far more demanding workload. This does not indicate the 3050 A is faster; it indicates the test suites measure different performance aspects.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 3050 A Mobile wins in scenarios requiring low power and compact integration. Its 45 W TDP and IGP form factor make it suitable for thin-and-light notebooks where a discrete GPU with external power is impossible. The lack of power connectors means it draws entirely from the motherboard, and its portable-device-dependent display outputs allow flexible panel configurations. This GPU handles DirectX 9, 10, and 11 workloads with relative strength, as shown by its PassMark scores of 152, 61, and 94 respectively. For legacy games, 2D productivity, and basic multimedia, the 3050 A provides adequate performance without compromising portability.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in every scenario demanding maximum performance. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 compute, 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 16 GB GDDR7 capacity handle modern AAA games, ray tracing, and AI workloads. The 70 RT cores provide substantial hardware ray tracing capability, while 280 tensor cores accelerate DLSS and other neural network operations. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,269.5 confirms it can sustain modern graphics APIs at high settings. The dual-slot cooler and 16-pin power connector indicate a chassis designed for sustained heavy load, making it the choice for high-refresh-rate gaming and content creation on a laptop.

The 5070 Ti SUPER also wins on connectivity and future-proofing. Its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface doubles the bandwidth of the 3050 A's PCIe 4.0 x8 link, and its DisplayPort 2.1b outputs support higher-resolution and higher-refresh-rate external displays. The 3050 A's PCIe 4.0 x8 and portable-device-dependent outputs limit external display flexibility.

In summary, the RTX 3050 A Mobile is the pick for lightweight, power-efficient laptops handling older games and everyday tasks. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the pick for heavy gaming, ray tracing, and compute-intensive workloads in large, well-cooled laptops. The data leaves no ambiguity: these GPUs serve entirely different user segments, and the 5070 Ti SUPER's massive specification advantages make it the clear performance winner across the board.