NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. This absence of recorded comparison data is notable, as the two cards occupy vastly different performance tiers based on their individual specifications and available test results.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, the recorded benchmark suite provides a clear performance profile. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 1515 points. Passmark results show a G3D score of 10738, a GPU compute score of 5192, and DirectX API-specific scores of 124 for DirectX 9, 72 for DirectX 11, 59 for DirectX 10, and 53 for DirectX 12. The 2D graphics score sits at 882. These figures place the RTX 3050 6 GB at the 15th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 2329.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmarks in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty. However, its percentile ranking against all GPUs is 50, which places it above the midpoint of the database distribution. This percentile figure, combined with the specification sheet, suggests the LX PRO occupies a higher performance bracket than the RTX 3050 6 GB, despite the absence of direct measurement data.

The nearest rival data for the RTX 3050 6 GB shows how tightly clustered its performance is around the 2329 average score. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M scores 2335, a delta of -0.3 percent relative to the RTX 3050. The NVIDIA Quadro P620 scores 2339, a delta of -0.4 percent. The Intel HD Graphics 510 scores 2305, a delta of 1 percent. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M scores 2363, a delta of -1.4 percent. These small deltas, all within roughly 1.5 percent of the RTX 3050 6 GB's average, indicate that the card's overall benchmark average is closely matched by older and lower-tier hardware.

For the LX PRO, the absence of benchmark scores means no performance comparisons can be drawn from direct measurements. The database records no wins for either card in head-to-head testing, as no such tests exist. Any performance assessment must therefore rely on architectural and specification differences, which are substantial.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each card?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB has an average benchmark score of 2329, placing it at the 15th percentile among all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmarks, yet its percentile ranking is 50.

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: The RTX 3050 6 GB uses 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, delivering 168.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO's memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, compared to 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective for the RTX 3050.

Q: What are the compute capabilities in terms of FP32 throughput?

A: The RTX 3050 6 GB delivers 6.774 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is substantially higher. The LX PRO also supports FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 3050 offers 6.774 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: Which card has more shading units and texture units?

A: The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The RTX 3050 6 GB has 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The LX PRO's counts are higher in every category.

Q: Do both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate with the 12_2 feature level. Both also support OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 3050 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 3050 6 GB has a TDP of 70 W and a suggested power supply of 250 W, with no power connectors required. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested power supply of 550 W, requiring one 16-pin power connector.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA107 chip, manufactured on an 8 nm process at Samsung. The chip contains 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. This is a mature architecture from the GeForce 30-series generation, with the card's production status listed as end-of-life.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a fundamentally different architecture called TrueGPU, built around the 7G105 chip. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, a more advanced node than the RTX 3050's 8 nm Samsung process. The transistor count and die size for the LX PRO are recorded as unknown, and the transistor density is not listed. The LX PRO belongs to the 7G100 generation, and its production status is active.

The RTX 3050 6 GB includes dedicated ray tracing cores and tensor cores. It has 18 ray tracing cores and 72 tensor cores, reflecting NVIDIA's hardware acceleration approach for ray-traced workloads and AI-based features. The LX PRO lists no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores in its specifications, indicating a different design philosophy that relies on raw shading throughput rather than specialized acceleration units.

The FP16 compute ratio also highlights architectural differences. The RTX 3050 delivers FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning both data types process at the same rate. The LX PRO delivers FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, doubling the FP16 throughput relative to FP32. This suggests the LX PRO is designed to handle workloads that benefit from reduced-precision arithmetic, such as certain machine learning inference tasks, more efficiently than the RTX 3050.

The bus interface differs as well. The RTX 3050 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The wider interface on the LX PRO provides greater bandwidth to the host system, which can matter for data-intensive workloads that move large amounts of information between the GPU and CPU.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every major specification category. The RTX 3050 6 GB has a base clock of 1042 MHz and a boost clock of 1470 MHz. The LX PRO lists no base or boost clock figures in the database, making direct clock-speed comparison impossible.

Memory capacity differs significantly: 6 GB on the RTX 3050 versus 24 GB on the LX PRO. The memory bus width is 96-bit versus 192-bit, and memory bandwidth is 168.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. The memory type is GDDR6 for both, but the effective memory speed is 14 Gbps on the RTX 3050 and 18 Gbps on the LX PRO.

Compute resources are substantially higher on the LX PRO. Shading units are 2304 versus 6144. Texture mapping units are 72 versus 192. Raster output units are 32 versus 96. The RTX 3050 has 18 ray tracing cores and 72 tensor cores, while the LX PRO has none listed. Pixel rate is 47.04 GPixel/s for the RTX 3050 and 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO. Texture rate is 105.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 6.774 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 6.774 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS.

Power draw and cooling requirements diverge sharply. The RTX 3050 has a TDP of 70 W, requires no power connectors, and suggests a 250 W power supply. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, requires one 16-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. Both are dual-slot cards, but the LX PRO is slightly larger: 248 mm in length versus 242 mm, and 118 mm in height versus 112 mm. The LX PRO also lists a width of 48 mm, while the RTX 3050 does not list a width.

Display outputs differ: the RTX 3050 offers one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the LX PRO offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs with no HDMI. The RTX 3050 has a launch MSRP of 179 USD, while the LX PRO has no recorded launch MSRP.

The RTX 3050's release date is recorded as 2024-02-01, and it is marked end-of-life with a predecessor in GeForce 20 and a successor in GeForce 40. The LX PRO's release date is 2026-03-16, it is marked active, and it has no recorded predecessor or successor.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data supports clear use-case separation between these two cards, based on their specification sheets and the RTX 3050's benchmark results.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB wins in efficiency and integration simplicity. Its 70 W TDP requires no external power connectors, making it suitable for systems with limited power delivery. The suggested 250 W power supply is modest, and the dual-slot cooler with 242 mm length fits standard chassis layouts. The inclusion of HDMI 2.1 output broadens display compatibility beyond DisplayPort-only options. The RTX 3050 also includes 18 ray tracing cores and 72 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced games and AI-enhanced features that the LX PRO cannot offer, as it lists no such cores.

The RTX 3050's benchmark data shows it competes closely with older mobile and entry-level desktop parts. Its nearest rivals, all within 1.4 percent of its average score, include the GT 640M, Quadro P620, HD Graphics 510, and GT 550M. This clustering indicates the RTX 3050 6 GB delivers performance consistent with that tier of hardware, suitable for light gaming and general 2D and 3D tasks. Its DirectX 9 score of 124 is its strongest API result, suggesting particular competence in legacy DirectX workloads.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in raw compute capacity and memory resources. Its 6144 shading units, 192 texture units, and 96 ROPs provide more than double the shading throughput of the RTX 3050. The 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 figure is roughly 3.6 times the RTX 3050's 6.774 TFLOPS, and the FP16 rate of 49.15 TFLOPS is more than seven times higher. The 24 GB memory capacity and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth enable handling of large datasets and high-resolution textures that the 6 GB and 168.0 GB/s of the RTX 3050 cannot accommodate.

The LX PRO's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, despite having no recorded benchmark scores, indicates the database positions it above the median hardware population. The RTX 3050's 15th percentile ranking places it below that median. The LX PRO's active production status and 2026 release date also indicate current availability, while the RTX 3050 is end-of-life.

The LX PRO wins for compute-heavy workloads such as large-scale rendering, data processing, and tasks requiring substantial memory capacity. Its 192-bit bus and 18 Gbps effective memory speed provide a wide data path for bandwidth-intensive operations. The 2:1 FP16 ratio makes it better suited for mixed-precision workloads than the RTX 3050's 1:1 ratio.

The RTX 3050 wins for power-constrained environments and systems without auxiliary power connectors. Its 70 W draw and connector-free design make it drop-in compatible with many pre-built systems. The LX PRO's 225 W TDP and 16-pin connector requirement demand a power supply with dedicated GPU power delivery.

Neither card shows a head-to-head win in the database, as no direct comparison tests exist. The performance gap implied by specifications is large, but without recorded benchmarks for the LX PRO, the exact magnitude of that gap cannot be quantified from the data. What is clear is that the two cards target different segments: the RTX 3050 for efficient, entry-level gaming with ray tracing support, and the LX PRO for high-throughput compute with extensive memory resources.