NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark data presents an unusually one-sided picture. Across all nine head-to-head tests in the database, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 wins outright. The RTX A2000 Mobile does not secure a single victory in any DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan, or compute workload. This does not mean the mobile workstation card is without merit, but its strengths lie outside the measured metrics, specifically in its physical footprint and power envelope.

The RTX 2060 dominates in every graphics API workload. Its largest margins appear in legacy and DirectX 11 scenarios, where it leads by 71.9% in DirectX 10 and 61.8% in DirectX 11. The gap narrows considerably in DirectX 12, where the RTX 2060 still wins but by only 12.8%. This suggests that as workloads become more modern and better threaded, the RTX A2000 Mobile's architectural efficiency begins to close the distance, though it never crosses the finish line first.

The RTX A2000 Mobile's intended role is not reflected in these synthetic tests. As an IGP-class mobile part with no power connectors and a 95 W TDP, it is designed for portable workstations where battery life and thermals take priority over raw frame rates. The RTX 2060, with its 160 W TDP and dual-slot cooler, belongs to a desktop ecosystem where power delivery is a non-issue. The data shows that when both are pushed to their limits in identical workloads, the desktop card's additional power budget translates directly into higher scores.

For users comparing these two, the decision hinges on form factor. The RTX 2060 is the clear performance winner in every recorded test. The RTX A2000 Mobile is the only choice when the system must be a thin, lightweight laptop with integrated graphics soldered to the board. The benchmark results cannot be separated from this context: one is a desktop expansion card, the other is a mobile GPU baked into a portable system.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 records an average benchmark score of 15290, while the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile scores 13821. The RTX 2060 also sits at the 58th percentile among all GPUs, compared to the A2000 Mobile's 55th percentile.

Q: How large is the performance gap in DirectX 11?

A: The RTX 2060 scores 110 in Passmark DirectX 11, while the RTX A2000 Mobile scores 68. This gives the RTX 2060 a 61.8% lead in that specific test.

Q: Does the RTX A2000 Mobile win in any benchmark?

A: No. The head-to-head data shows the RTX 2060 winning all nine recorded tests. The wins tally is 9 for the RTX 2060 and 0 for the RTX A2000 Mobile.

Q: What is the closest result between the two cards?

A: The DirectX 12 test is the closest, with the RTX 2060 scoring 53 and the RTX A2000 Mobile scoring 47, a delta of only 12.8%. This is significantly narrower than the 71.9% gap seen in DirectX 10.

Q: How do their compute performances compare?

A: In Passmark GPU Compute, the RTX 2060 scores 5488 versus 4334 for the RTX A2000 Mobile, a 26.6% advantage. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 2060 leads by 15% (65014 vs 56518).

Q: Are both cards based on the same architecture?

A: No. The RTX 2060 uses the Turing architecture on a 12 nm TSMC process, while the RTX A2000 Mobile uses the Ampere architecture on an 8 nm Samsung process.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database records nine direct comparisons, and the pattern is consistent: the RTX 2060 wins every test, but the margin varies dramatically by workload type. The largest gap appears in Passmark DirectX 10, where the RTX 2060 scores 98 against the A2000 Mobile's 57, a 71.9% difference. This is a legacy API test, and the result suggests the older Turing architecture still has substantial strength in older rendering paths.

DirectX 11 tells a similar story. The RTX 2060 posts 110, while the A2000 Mobile manages 68, a 61.8% lead. DirectX 9 shows a 65.2% gap (190 vs 115). These three legacy API results indicate that the RTX 2060's higher texture rate (201.6 GTexel/s versus 135.0 GTexel/s) and larger memory bandwidth (336.0 GB/s versus 192.0 GB/s) translate directly into superior fill-rate-bound performance.

Moving to modern APIs, the gap compresses. In DirectX 12, the RTX 2060 scores 53 versus 47, a lead of only 12.8%. This is the closest result in the entire comparison. The A2000 Mobile's Ampere architecture, with its 2560 shading units compared to the RTX 2060's 1920, appears to scale better with parallel workloads that leverage newer API features. Despite having fewer TMUs (80 versus 120) and lower raw texture throughput, the A2000 Mobile's higher FP32 throughput (8.637 TFLOPS versus 6.451 TFLOPS) helps it stay competitive in compute-adjacent rendering tasks.

The compute-oriented tests reinforce this pattern. Geekbench Vulkan shows the RTX 2060 ahead by 23.9% (65846 vs 53146), while Geekbench OpenCL shows a 15% lead (65014 vs 56518). Passmark GPU Compute gives the RTX 2060 a 26.6% advantage (5488 vs 4334). The 2D test is also decisive: Passmark G2D scores 745 for the RTX 2060 and 491 for the A2000 Mobile, a 51.7% gap that reflects the desktop card's dedicated display outputs and higher pixel rate (80.64 GPixel/s versus 80.98 GPixel/s, nearly identical but implemented differently).

The overall 3D performance difference is captured in Passmark G3D: 14111 for the RTX 2060 versus 9611 for the A2000 Mobile, a 46.8% lead. This is the headline number for gaming and general 3D workloads. The RTX 2060's nearest rivals in the database include the GeForce GTX 580 (average score 15283, 0% delta) and the AMD Radeon 680M (15270, 0.1% delta), placing it in a tight cluster of mid-range performers. The A2000 Mobile, by contrast, sits near the AMD Radeon 660M (13812, 0.1% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 570X (13871, -0.4% delta), a slightly lower performance tier.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs diverge sharply on memory and physical specifications. The RTX 2060 offers 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX A2000 Mobile is limited to 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s. This 144 GB/s bandwidth deficit is a primary reason for the RTX 2060's dominance in texture-heavy benchmarks.

Clock speeds are closer than expected. The RTX 2060 runs at 1365 MHz base and 1680 MHz boost, while the A2000 Mobile runs at 1215 MHz base and 1687 MHz boost. The boost clocks are nearly identical, differing by only 7 MHz, but the RTX 2060's higher base clock and larger memory bandwidth carry the day.

Power and form factor differences are stark. The RTX 2060 consumes 160 W, requires a dual-slot cooler, a single 8-pin power connector, and a 450 W suggested PSU. The A2000 Mobile is rated at 95 W, uses an IGP (integrated graphics processor) form factor, requires no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU because it is soldered to a motherboard. The RTX 2060 measures 229 mm in length, 113 mm in height, and 35 mm in width. The A2000 Mobile has no recorded dimensions because it is not a standalone card.

The bus interface also differs: PCIe 3.0 x16 for the RTX 2060 versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for the A2000 Mobile. Display outputs are another differentiator. The RTX 2060 provides 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C. The A2000 Mobile's outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning they vary by laptop implementation.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is generational. The RTX 2060 uses the TU106 chip on NVIDIA's Turing architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 12 nm process with 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die. The RTX A2000 Mobile uses the GA107 chip on the Ampere architecture, fabricated by Samsung on an 8 nm process with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die.

The transistor density tells a compelling story. The A2000 Mobile packs 43.5 million transistors per mm², nearly double the RTX 2060's 24.3 million per mm². This is the efficiency gain from the 8 nm node. However, the RTX 2060 has a larger absolute transistor budget, which contributes to its higher raw performance in most tests.

Shader and compute resources favor each card differently. The RTX 2060 has 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The A2000 Mobile has 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The A2000 Mobile has 33% more shading units, but 33% fewer TMUs. This explains why the A2000 Mobile's FP32 throughput (8.637 TFLOPS) exceeds the RTX 2060's (6.451 TFLOPS), yet the RTX 2060's texture rate (201.6 GTexel/s) crushes the A2000 Mobile's (135.0 GTexel/s).

Ray tracing and tensor cores also differ. The RTX 2060 carries 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. The A2000 Mobile has 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores. The RTX 2060's tensor core advantage (3x) is notable for AI workloads, though the A2000 Mobile's FP16 performance (8.637 TFLOPS at 1:1 ratio) is more straightforward than the RTX 2060's FP16 (12.90 TFLOPS at 2:1 ratio). The A2000 Mobile's FP16 is not a doubled rate; it is native, which can be preferable for certain compute tasks.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 2060 was released on January 6, 2019, with the A2000 Mobile following on April 11, 2021. Both are marked end-of-life, with the RTX 2060's predecessor being GeForce 10 and successor GeForce 30, while the A2000 Mobile's predecessor is Quadro Turing-M and successor is Ada-MW.

The Verdict

The benchmark database is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile in every recorded test. The average score difference is 1469 points (15290 vs 13821), and the RTX 2060 wins all nine head-to-head comparisons. For anyone building a desktop system where size and power are not constraints, the RTX 2060 is the superior choice across DirectX 9 through 12, OpenCL, Vulkan, compute, and 2D workloads.

The RTX A2000 Mobile's case rests entirely on its form factor. It is an IGP with no power connectors, a 95 W TDP, and no physical dimensions because it does not exist as a standalone card. It belongs in a mobile workstation where the alternative is integrated graphics, not a desktop GPU. In that context, its 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 2560 shading units provide respectable performance for a laptop component, and its PCIe 4.0 interface is more modern than the RTX 2060's PCIe 3.0.

The data also reveals where the A2000 Mobile comes closest to closing the gap. In DirectX 12, the delta shrinks to 12.8%, and its higher FP32 throughput (8.637 TFLOPS) suggests that compute-heavy, modern workloads are its best case. But the RTX 2060's massive memory bandwidth advantage (336.0 GB/s vs 192.0 GB/s) and texture rate (201.6 GTexel/s vs 135.0 GTexel/s) are decisive in nearly every other scenario.

The verdict is straightforward: choose the RTX 2060 for desktop performance, choose the RTX A2000 Mobile only when the system must be portable and the GPU must be integrated. The RTX 2060's launch MSRP was 349 USD, and it delivers a 58th-percentile standing among all GPUs. The A2000 Mobile has no recorded launch MSRP and sits at the 55th percentile. For raw capability, the RTX 2060 wins outright. For mobile deployment, the A2000 Mobile is the only viable option, and its performance, while lower, is still competitive within its constrained power envelope.