GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A310

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1750 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1245 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

30,607

N/A

geekbench_vulkan

28,964

N/A

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

625

N/A

passmark_g3d

5,433

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

2,157

N/A

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

274

Analysis: Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Visual performance tests between the Arc A310 card from Intel and NVIDIA's RTX 2050 graphics indicate a clear winner. the Arc A310 card from Intel delivers considerably better frame rates in recent AAA releases. This VRAM superiority and architectural enhancements convert into noticeably smoother gameplay results. Test figures demonstrates this conclusion. Users seeking premium visuals might consider this.

NVIDIA's RTX 2050 graphics encounters issues to rival the Arc A310 card from Intel's sheer throughput. In value-focused buyers, NVIDIA's RTX 2050 graphics could still deliver reasonable results, but people wanting the best quality would lean toward the Arc A310 card from Intel. The gaming gap is notably considerable to deny. Resource-hungry scenarios especially reveal this disparity. The cost difference delivers benefits in performance.

When it comes to RT, the Arc A310 card from Intel pulls further beyond of NVIDIA's RTX 2050 graphics. The RT cores execute heavy reflection effects considerably more effectively. Users wanting next-gen effects will definitely choose the Arc A310 card from Intel. The RT capability is considerable. Modern releases continually leverage hardware RT features.

In conclusion, the Arc A310 card from Intel offers the superior option in this analysis. Its gaming superiority justify evaluation for users putting together a demanding rendering PC. Even though NVIDIA's RTX 2050 graphics has its strengths, the performance results undeniably benefits the Arc A310 card from Intel. Base your decision accordingly. This gaming margin is notable sufficiently to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A310

RTX 2050 Mobile

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

2,048 +166.7%

Shaders

768

2,048 +166.7%

TMUs

64 +100.0%

ROPs

32 +100.0%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1750 MHz

735 MHz

Boost Clock

1750 MHz

1245 MHz

Memory Clock

1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

4,096 0.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

64 bit

Bandwidth

124.0 GB/s

112.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

64 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

4 MB

2 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

28.00 GPixel/s

39.84 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

56.00 GTexel/s

79.68 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

2.688 TFLOPS

5.100 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

672.0 GFLOPS (1:4)

159.4 GFLOPS (1:32)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.376 TFLOPS (2:1)

10.20 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

32 +433.3%

Tensor Cores

—

XMX Cores

—

Power

TDP

30 W

TDP (W)

30 0.0%

Suggested PSU

200 W

—

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Ampere

GPU Name

DG2-128

GA107

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 3)

GeForce 20 Mobile

Process Size

6 nm

8 nm

Transistors

7,200 million

8,700 million

Die Size

157 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

45.9M / mm²

43.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Single-slot

—

Length

—

229 mm 9 inches

Height

—

113 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

1x DVI1x HDMI 2.12x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 3.0 x8

Other

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Xe Graphics

GeForce 10 Mobile

Successor

Battlemage

GeForce 30 Mobile

View Arc A310 Details View GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile Details