NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data places these two NVIDIA parts in entirely different performance tiers, with the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell dominating the MX570 in every measurable category. The most striking gap appears in raw compute throughput: the RTX PRO 4500 delivers 50.53 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is more than ten times the MX570's 4.731 TFLOPS. That is not a marginal difference; it represents a fundamental shift in processing capability.

Memory bandwidth tells a similar story. The RTX PRO 4500's 896.0 GB/s bandwidth is over nine times the MX570's 96.00 GB/s. This disparity directly impacts texture-heavy workloads and large dataset manipulation. The pixel rate differential is even more pronounced: 269.6 GPixel/s versus 36.96 GPixel/s, a factor of roughly 7.3. Texture rate follows at 789.5 GTexel/s against 73.92 GTexel/s, an approximate 10.7x advantage for the Blackwell part.

The benchmark scores reflect these architectural advantages. The MX570's sole recorded benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL, yields 38299 points, placing it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile at 38349 (0.1% ahead), the RTX 4080 Mobile at 38135 (0.4% behind), the MX570 A at 38691 (1% ahead), and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X at 38706 (1.1% ahead). The MX570 essentially trades blows with these mobile and workstation parts, remaining within roughly one percent of each.

The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, by contrast, shows a broader benchmark profile. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 31532, with a 76th percentile ranking. The Geekbench Vulkan score reaches 221768, while Passmark G3D hits 33360 and Passmark GPU Compute reaches 19255. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA TITAN RTX at 31676 (0.5% ahead), the GRID M60-1Q at 31220 (1% behind), the Quadro M5000 at 31206 (1% behind), and the Intel Arc Pro A30M at 31894 (1.1% ahead). The RTX PRO 4500 sits in a tight cluster around the 31,000-32,000 average score range, indicating strong competition at that performance level.

The DirectX results for the RTX PRO 4500 reveal interesting variation across API generations: Passmark DirectX 9 scores 397, DirectX 10 scores 204, DirectX 11 scores 320, and DirectX 12 scores only 119. The lower DirectX 12 number relative to older API scores suggests that the card's raw power may be constrained by driver maturity or workload characteristics in that specific test.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell in FP32 compute compared to the MX570?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 delivers 50.53 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the MX570 provides 4.731 TFLOPS. This represents an approximate 10.7x advantage for the Blackwell card.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The MX570 features 2 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX PRO 4500 uses 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do their benchmark percentiles compare?

A: The MX570 sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 38299. The RTX PRO 4500 ranks at the 76th percentile with an average score of 31532 across its multiple benchmark tests.

Q: Which card has higher ray tracing core counts?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 includes 82 ray tracing cores, while the MX570 has 16. The Blackwell card also has 328 tensor cores compared to 64 on the Ampere-based MX570.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings?

A: The MX570 has a TDP of 15 W, making it suitable for integrated graphics packages. The RTX PRO 4500 carries a 200 W TDP with a suggested 550 W power supply.

Q: Are these cards from the same architectural generation?

A: No. The MX570 uses the Ampere architecture (GA107S chip) on Samsung's 8 nm process. The RTX PRO 4500 uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture (GB203 chip) on TSMC's 5 nm process.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs represent distinct architectural generations with fundamentally different design philosophies. The MX570 is built on NVIDIA's Ampere architecture, using the GA107S chip manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process. The die measures 200 mm² and contains 8,700 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. This is a modest, power-efficient design aimed at thin-and-light portable systems.

The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell uses the GB203 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, a more advanced node that allows for significantly higher transistor density. The die is 378 mm² and packs 45,600 million transistors, resulting in a density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. That density figure is nearly three times higher than the MX570, reflecting both the newer process and the architectural complexity of Blackwell 2.0.

Memory architecture diverges sharply. The MX570 uses 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 1500 MHz memory clock (12 Gbps effective). The RTX PRO 4500 employs 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 1750 MHz memory clock (28 Gbps effective). The bus width and memory type combine to deliver the massive bandwidth advantage noted earlier.

Compute resources scale accordingly. The MX570 has 2048 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The RTX PRO 4500 fields 10496 shading units, 328 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. Ray tracing cores jump from 16 to 82, and tensor cores from 64 to 328. These are not incremental upgrades; they represent a full platform shift.

Clock speeds also differ substantially. The MX570 runs at a base clock of 832 MHz with a boost of 1155 MHz. The RTX PRO 4500 starts at 1635 MHz base and boosts to 2407 MHz. Even accounting for the higher TDP, the Blackwell part sustains much higher operating frequencies.

The interface and physical specifications reflect their intended markets. The MX570 uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and is an integrated graphics package (IGP) with no power connectors. The RTX PRO 4500 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, occupies a dual-slot form factor, requires a 16-pin power connector, and measures 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

Display outputs also differ: the MX570's outputs are listed as portable device dependent, while the RTX PRO 4500 provides four DisplayPort 2.1b connections. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API feature parity exists despite the generational gap.

The Verdict

The data paints a clear picture for different use cases. The MX570, with its 15 W TDP and integrated form factor, is designed for maximum portability and minimal power draw. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 38299 and 81st percentile ranking show it performs respectably within its power envelope, trading closely with mobile RTX 4080 and RTX 5080 parts in that specific test. For lightweight productivity, basic multimedia, or systems where battery life and heat are primary concerns, the MX570 remains a viable option.

The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is a workstation-class GPU built for sustained heavy workloads. Its 200 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, and 16-pin power connector signal that it expects a desktop workstation chassis with adequate cooling and power delivery. The 32 GB GDDR7 memory and 256-bit bus make it suitable for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and compute-heavy professional applications. The Passmark G3D score of 33360 and GPU Compute score of 19255 indicate strong sustained performance across multiple benchmark methodologies.

Professionals working with 3D rendering, simulation, or AI inference would find the RTX PRO 4500's 82 ray tracing cores, 328 tensor cores, and 50.53 TFLOPS FP32 throughput essential. The MX570's 16 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores suffice only for basic acceleration tasks. The RTX PRO 4500's production status is active, while the MX570 is end-of-life, so the newer part also offers better long-term driver support and ecosystem longevity.

The release dates reinforce this positioning: the MX570 launched in December 2021, while the RTX PRO 4500 arrived in March 2025. The RTX PRO 4500's predecessor is listed as Workstation Ada, indicating a clear professional lineage. The MX570 belongs to the GeForce MX (5xx) generation, a consumer-oriented mobile line.

Users who prioritize battery efficiency and compact systems should choose the MX570. Users who need maximum compute throughput, large memory capacity, and professional display outputs should select the RTX PRO 4500. There is no meaningful overlap in their performance profiles; the data shows they serve entirely different market segments.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GA107S | GB203 |

| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 8 nm (Samsung) | 5 nm (TSMC) |

| Transistors | 8,700 million | 45,600 million |

| Die Size | 200 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 43.5M / mm² | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 832 MHz | 1635 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2407 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 2 GB | 32 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | 64 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 10496 |

| TMUs | 64 | 328 |

| ROPs | 32 | 112 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 82 |

| Tensor Cores | 64 | 328 |

| Pixel Rate | 36.96 GPixel/s | 269.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 789.5 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | 50.53 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | 50.53 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 200 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not specified | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2021-12-16 | 2025-03-17 |