NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Comparison

The NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA GeForce MX570 are both Ampere-based GPUs, but they serve entirely different purposes. The data shows a decisive performance gap in favor of the RTX A2000, which posts an average benchmark score of 46043 compared to the MX570’s 38299. This difference is driven by fundamental hardware disparities, from compute resources to memory bandwidth, making the A2000 the clear choice for demanding workstation tasks while the MX570 remains a low-power option for basic portable computing.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison available in the database is Geekbench OpenCL, and the result is not close. The RTX A2000 scores 67695, while the MX570 scores 38299. That represents a 76.8% advantage for the A2000, a massive lead in raw compute throughput. In practical terms, the A2000 delivers nearly 1.77 times the OpenCL performance of the MX570, which translates directly to faster rendering, simulation, and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Looking at the broader benchmark landscape, the A2000’s average score of 46043 places it at the 85th percentile of all GPUs tracked. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45972, just 0.2% slower), the Intel Arc A730M (45592, 1% slower), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46601, 1.2% faster). The A2000 sits in a tightly contested performance band, but its 85th percentile ranking confirms it is well above the median GPU in the database.

The MX570, by contrast, holds an average score of 38299 and sits at the 81st percentile. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (38349, 0.1% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38135, 0.4% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A (38691, 1% faster). The MX570 is competitive with these mobile and workstation parts, but it is clearly a tier below the A2000 in absolute terms.

The delta between the two GPUs is stark: the A2000 outperforms the MX570 by 76.8% in the one shared benchmark. No other head-to-head tests are recorded, so this single data point carries significant weight. The A2000’s win count in the database is 1, while the MX570 has 0 wins. This is not a balanced rivalry; it is a one-sided comparison where the A2000 dominates in the measured workload.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs are built on the Ampere architecture and use Samsung’s 8 nm process node, with an identical transistor density of 43.5M per mm². However, the silicon itself differs substantially. The A2000 uses the GA106 chip with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. The MX570 uses the GA107S chip with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. The A2000 packs 38% more transistors into a 38% larger die, which explains its superior compute capacity.

The A2000 features 3328 shading units, 104 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. The MX570 is cut down significantly, with 2048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. That means the A2000 has 62.5% more shading units, 62.5% more TMUs, and 50% more ROPs. Ray tracing hardware follows the same pattern: the A2000 has 26 RT cores and 104 tensor cores, while the MX570 has 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores. Every computational resource is larger on the A2000, which is why its FP32 throughput reaches 7.987 TFLOPS compared to the MX570’s 4.731 TFLOPS, a 68.8% advantage.

Memory is another major divider. The A2000 comes with 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The MX570 has only 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 96.00 GB/s. The A2000 offers three times the memory capacity and three times the memory bandwidth. This matters enormously for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and multi-scene workloads where memory pressure is common.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The MX570 has a higher base clock at 832 MHz versus the A2000’s 562 MHz, though the boost clocks are closer: 1155 MHz for the MX570 and 1200 MHz for the A2000. Despite the lower base clock, the A2000’s massive shader count and wider memory bus overwhelm the MX570’s clock advantage. The A2000 also achieves higher pixel and texture rates: 57.60 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s, versus 36.96 GPixel/s and 73.92 GTexel/s for the MX570.

Power consumption is where the MX570 fights back. The A2000 has a 70 W TDP, while the MX570 draws only 15 W. That is a 55 W difference, making the MX570 far more suitable for thin-and-light laptops. The A2000 is a dual-slot card with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W, while the MX570 is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no separate power connectors and no suggested PSU listed. The bus interface also differs: the A2000 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the MX570 uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 is the superior GPU for performance-critical tasks. Its 76.8% lead in Geekbench OpenCL, combined with higher average scores, a higher percentile ranking, and vastly superior memory and compute resources, makes it the only choice for users who need real GPU horsepower. The A2000’s 6 GB memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are essential for professional workloads like 3D rendering, video editing, and scientific computing.

The MX570, however, is not without merit. Its 15 W TDP is a fraction of the A2000’s 70 W, and its IGP form factor means it can be integrated directly into portable devices without discrete cooling solutions. For users who prioritize battery life, portability, and low heat generation over raw performance, the MX570 is the appropriate pick. It still delivers 4.731 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is respectable for light CUDA acceleration, basic photo editing, and everyday GPU tasks.

The choice comes down to use case. If the workload demands maximum throughput and memory capacity, the RTX A2000 wins decisively. If the priority is an ultra-low-power GPU that fits into a compact laptop, the MX570 is the logical option. There is no middle ground in the recorded data: the A2000 is a workstation-class part, and the MX570 is a mobile efficiency part.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The A2000 uses the GA106 chip, while the MX570 uses GA107S. Transistor counts are 12,000 million versus 8,700 million, and die sizes are 276 mm² versus 200 mm². Both share the same process node and foundry, but the A2000 packs more silicon.

Compute resources: the A2000 has 3328 shading units, 104 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 26 RT cores, and 104 tensor cores. The MX570 has 2048 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 16 RT cores, and 64 tensor cores.

Memory: the A2000 has 6 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The MX570 has 2 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. Both use 12 Gbps effective memory clocks, but the A2000’s wider bus triples bandwidth.

Clocks: the A2000 runs at 562 MHz base and 1200 MHz boost; the MX570 runs at 832 MHz base and 1155 MHz boost. The MX570 has a higher base clock, but the A2000 has a higher boost clock.

Rates: the A2000 achieves 57.60 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s; the MX570 achieves 36.96 GPixel/s and 73.92 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 throughput are 7.987 TFLOPS for the A2000 and 4.731 TFLOPS for the MX570, both at 1:1 ratio.

Power and form factor: the A2000 has a 70 W TDP, is dual-slot, and lists a 250 W suggested PSU. The MX570 has a 15 W TDP, is an IGP, and lists no suggested PSU. The A2000 uses PCIe 4.0 x16; the MX570 uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

Display outputs: the A2000 offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, while the MX570’s outputs are listed as portable-device dependent. The A2000 is 167 mm long and 69 mm high; the MX570 has no recorded dimensions. Release dates differ: the A2000 launched on 2021-08-09, while the MX570 launched on 2021-12-16.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in OpenCL benchmarks?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A2000 scores 67695 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 scores 38299. The A2000 leads by 76.8%.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RTX A2000 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the MX570 has 2 GB of GDDR6 memory. The A2000 also has a 192-bit memory bus versus the MX570’s 64-bit bus.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RTX A2000 has a 70 W TDP, while the MX570 has a 15 W TDP. The MX570 consumes significantly less power, making it more suitable for portable devices.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: Yes, both are based on the Ampere architecture and support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The RTX A2000 has 26 RT cores, while the MX570 has 16 RT cores.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each?

A: The RTX A2000 has an average benchmark score of 46043, placing it at the 85th percentile of all GPUs. The MX570 has an average score of 38299, placing it at the 81st percentile.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The RTX A2000 delivers 7.987 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the MX570 delivers 4.731 TFLOPS. The A2000 is 68.8% faster in raw FP32 throughput.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX A2000 wins in every performance-related category recorded. Its 76.8% OpenCL advantage, triple memory capacity, triple memory bandwidth, and superior compute resources make it the definitive choice for workstation tasks. The A2000’s 85th percentile ranking versus the MX570’s 81st percentile further confirms its higher standing in the database. Any workload that stresses the GPU, such as 3D rendering, machine learning inference, or high-resolution video processing, will benefit from the A2000’s 3328 shading units and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The MX570 wins in efficiency and portability. Its 15 W TDP is 78.6% lower than the A2000’s 70 W, and its IGP form factor requires no discrete power connectors. This makes it ideal for ultra-thin laptops where battery life and thermal management are critical. The MX570 also has a higher base clock (832 MHz versus 562 MHz), which may help in short, lightly threaded tasks that do not sustain boost clocks. For users who need GPU acceleration on the go without sacrificing battery life, the MX570 is the practical option.

There is no scenario in the recorded data where the MX570 outperforms the A2000 in raw speed. The A2000 is the clear winner for anyone prioritizing performance, while the MX570 is the winner for anyone prioritizing low power draw and compact integration.