NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile Comparison

NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile and GeForce MX570 target very different corners of the laptop market, and the benchmark data reflects that gap clearly. The RTX 5050 Mobile is a modern Blackwell-based part aimed at mainstream gaming and content creation, while the MX570 is an older, end-of-life Ampere chip designed for thin-and-light productivity machines. Their scores, architectures, and specifications tell a straightforward story of generational and performance-class separation.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only directly comparable benchmark in the data is Geekbench OpenCL, and it is not close. The RTX 5050 Mobile scores 84,171 points, while the MX570 manages 38,299 points. That is a 119.8% advantage for the RTX 5050 Mobile — more than double the raw compute output. In practical terms, the RTX 5050 Mobile delivers over twice the OpenCL throughput, which translates directly to faster GPU-accelerated workloads in applications that leverage OpenCL for video encoding, image processing, or physics simulation.

Look at how each card sits among its nearest rivals to understand the magnitude of this gap. The RTX 5050 Mobile’s average benchmark score is 43,268, placing it within 0.1% of the Quadro M6000 24 GB (43,262) and 0.9% below the RTX 4090 Mobile (43,667). That is remarkable company — the 5050 Mobile is effectively trading blows with a desktop Quadro workstation card and a flagship mobile RTX 4090 in aggregate benchmark terms. Meanwhile, the MX570’s average score of 38,299 puts it 1% below the MX570 A (38,691) and 0.4% above the RTX 4080 Mobile (38,135). The MX570 is not far off the pace of much larger mobile GPUs, but that only highlights how low the baseline is — its closest rival, the RTX 5080 Mobile, scores 38,349, which is just 0.1% higher.

The wins tally is a clean sweep: the RTX 5050 Mobile wins 1 head-to-head comparison, and the MX570 wins 0. The delta is so large that no single workload in the data favors the older card. Even accounting for driver maturity or workload-specific quirks, the 119.8% OpenCL lead is a decisive, all-encompassing victory.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5050 Mobile wins everywhere the data measures. Its 84,171 Geekbench OpenCL score suggests it can handle demanding GPU compute tasks like 3D rendering, CAD, or machine learning inference without breaking a sweat. The 7.680 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 7.680 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1 ratio) mean it can process both single-precision and half-precision workloads at identical rates, which is useful for AI applications that rely on FP16 acceleration.

The MX570, by contrast, is not a winner in any benchmark category in this dataset. With 4.731 TFLOPS of FP32 and the same 4.731 TFLOPS of FP16, it offers roughly 62% of the RTX 5050 Mobile’s raw compute throughput. Its 36.96 GPixel/s pixel rate and 73.92 GTexel/s texture rate are also lower than the 5050 Mobile’s 48.00 GPixel/s and 120.0 GTexel/s. For everyday tasks like office work, web browsing, or light photo editing, the MX570 is perfectly adequate — but the data does not show it winning any competitive scenario against the 5050 Mobile.

If you are choosing between these two strictly on performance, the MX570’s only conceivable advantage is its 15 W TDP, which is one-third of the RTX 5050 Mobile’s 50 W. That makes the MX570 a better fit for ultra-portable designs where battery life and thermal headroom are paramount. But for anything that stresses the GPU, the RTX 5050 Mobile is the clear choice.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5050 Mobile is built on the GB207 chip using Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 16,900 million transistors into a 149 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 113.4 million per mm². The MX570 uses the GA107S chip with Ampere architecture, fabricated on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It contains 8,700 million transistors spread across a larger 200 mm² die, resulting in a much lower density of 43.5 million per mm².

These architectural differences translate directly into features and efficiency. Blackwell 2.0 is a newer generation, and the RTX 5050 Mobile supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the MX570 is limited to PCIe 4.0 x8. That doubles the available bandwidth ceiling for the newer card, which matters for data-heavy workloads. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical.

The RTX 5050 Mobile also has more of everything compute-related: 2,560 shading units versus 2,048, 80 TMUs versus 64, 20 RT cores versus 16, and 80 tensor cores versus 64. The 5050 Mobile’s 32 ROPs match the MX570’s 32 ROPs, but every other compute block is larger. The memory subsystem is also fundamentally different — the 5050 Mobile uses GDDR7, while the MX570 uses GDDR6 — which contributes to a massive bandwidth gap (384.0 GB/s versus 96.00 GB/s).

Specification Differences

The specification sheets diverge sharply across memory, clocks, and power. The RTX 5050 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The MX570 has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding just 96.00 GB/s — a quarter of the bandwidth. Memory clock is nominally similar at 1500 MHz, but the effective data rate differs: 24 Gbps for the 5050 Mobile versus 12 Gbps for the MX570.

Clock speeds also favor the newer card. The RTX 5050 Mobile runs at a base clock of 1020 MHz and boosts to 1500 MHz. The MX570 starts lower at 832 MHz and boosts to only 1155 MHz. That 345 MHz boost advantage, combined with more shading units and higher memory throughput, explains the substantial performance delta.

Power consumption is the one category where the MX570 leads. Its TDP is 15 W, compared to 50 W for the RTX 5050 Mobile. Both are IGP slot-width designs with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs, so they are meant to be soldered onto motherboards. The MX570 is end-of-life, while the RTX 5050 Mobile is active production with a 2025 release date. The predecessor of the RTX 5050 Mobile is the GeForce 40 Mobile series; the MX570 has no listed predecessor or successor.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5050 Mobile than the MX570 in OpenCL?

A: The RTX 5050 Mobile scores 84,171 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the MX570 scores 38,299. That is a 119.8% advantage for the RTX 5050 Mobile.

Q: Which GPU has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5050 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The MX570 has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the TDP differences?

A: The RTX 5050 Mobile has a 50 W TDP, while the MX570 has a 15 W TDP. This makes the MX570 more suitable for low-power, ultra-portable designs.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX and Vulkan versions?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor density?

A: The RTX 5050 Mobile has a density of 113.4 million transistors per mm², compared to 43.5 million per mm² for the MX570.

Q: Is the MX570 still in production?

A: No, the MX570 is end-of-life. The RTX 5050 Mobile is active production and was released later.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the RTX 5050 Mobile is the superior GPU in every performance metric measured. Its OpenCL score is more than double the MX570’s, its memory bandwidth is four times higher, and its shading unit count is 25% greater. If you need GPU compute power for gaming, 3D rendering, or AI workloads, the RTX 5050 Mobile is the only rational choice between these two.

The MX570’s sole advantage is its 15 W TDP, which is one-third of the RTX 5050 Mobile’s 50 W. That makes it viable for fanless or passively cooled ultrabooks where every watt counts and where performance expectations are modest. The MX570 is also end-of-life, so it should only be considered for legacy designs or extremely constrained power budgets.

For a mainstream laptop buyer, the RTX 5050 Mobile’s 83rd percentile ranking among all GPUs — versus the MX570’s 81st percentile — understates how much faster it is in practice. The average benchmark score of 43,268 for the 5050 Mobile versus 38,299 for the MX570 reflects a 13% gap in aggregate, but the head-to-head OpenCL test shows the true scale: 119.8% faster. Choose the RTX 5050 Mobile unless your absolute priority is minimal power draw.