NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce MX570?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 43,667, while the MX570 scores 38,299. This places the RTX 4090 Mobile at the 84th percentile of all GPUs, compared to the 81st percentile for the MX570.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor count and by how much?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile uses 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, whereas the MX570 uses 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. The RTX 4090 Mobile's transistor density is 121.1M per mm², versus 43.5M per mm² for the MX570.

Q: How do the memory configurations differ between these two GPUs?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The MX570 has 2 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the RTX 4090 Mobile versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for the MX570.

Q: What are the architectural generations of these GPUs?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD103 chip on a 5 nm process from TSMC. The MX570 is based on the Ampere architecture using the GA107S chip on an 8 nm process from Samsung.

Q: Which GPU has a higher TDP, and what is the difference?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile has a TDP of 120 W, while the MX570 has a TDP of 15 W. This is an 8x difference in power envelope, reflecting the RTX 4090 Mobile's desktop-class performance ambitions in a mobile form factor.

Q: In the sole head-to-head benchmark available, what is the performance gap?

A: In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 4090 Mobile scores 180,831 versus 38,299 for the MX570, a delta of 372.2% in favor of the RTX 4090 Mobile.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4090 Mobile wins the only direct benchmark comparison available. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, it delivers 180,831 points versus 38,299 for the MX570. That is a 372.2% advantage, meaning the RTX 4090 Mobile is roughly 4.7 times faster in raw compute workloads measured by this test.

The MX570 has no benchmark wins in the head-to-head comparison. Its single available score of 38,299 in Geekbench OpenCL is its only data point. However, the MX570's advantage lies in its power efficiency profile: at 15 W TDP, it draws one-eighth the power of the RTX 4090 Mobile's 120 W. For thin-and-light laptops where battery life and thermals are paramount, the MX570 is designed to operate within a much tighter power budget.

The RTX 4090 Mobile's win extends beyond raw compute. Its Passmark G3D score of 27,212 and GPU compute score of 12,347 demonstrate strong 3D rendering and compute throughput. The MX570 has no Passmark scores listed, so direct comparisons in those workloads are not possible from the data.

Benchmark results indicate the RTX 4090 Mobile is positioned for demanding tasks like gaming, 3D rendering, and GPU-accelerated compute. The MX570, with its 15 W TDP and 2 GB memory, is oriented toward basic graphics acceleration and light productivity in ultraportable systems.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 4090 Mobile uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on TSMC's 5 nm process. The MX570 uses the Ampere architecture on Samsung's 8 nm process. This process node difference – 5 nm versus 8 nm – is a foundational distinction that affects transistor density: 121.1M per mm² for the RTX 4090 Mobile versus 43.5M per mm² for the MX570.

The chip designs differ significantly. The RTX 4090 Mobile uses the AD103 chip with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The MX570 uses the GA107S chip with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. Despite the MX570's smaller transistor count, its die is over half the size of the RTX 4090 Mobile's, reflecting the less dense 8 nm process.

Both architectures support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 4090 Mobile has 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores, while the MX570 has 16 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores. These are the same architectural features, but the RTX 4090 Mobile scales them up substantially.

The RTX 4090 Mobile is part of the GeForce 40 Mobile generation, with a predecessor in GeForce 30 Mobile and a successor in GeForce 50 Mobile. The MX570 belongs to the GeForce MX (5xx) generation and has no listed predecessor or successor. The production status also differs: the RTX 4090 Mobile is Active, while the MX570 is End-of-life.

Specification Differences

The RTX 4090 Mobile has 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. The MX570 has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. These are 4.75x, 4.75x, and 3.5x differences respectively.

Clock speeds differ considerably. The RTX 4090 Mobile runs at a base clock of 1335 MHz and a boost clock of 1695 MHz. The MX570 runs at 832 MHz base and 1155 MHz boost. The RTX 4090 Mobile's boost clock is 540 MHz higher.

Memory bandwidth is another major differentiator. The RTX 4090 Mobile's 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is 6x the MX570's 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s. Memory capacity is 16 GB versus 2 GB – an 8x difference.

Compute throughput reflects the hardware scaling. The RTX 4090 Mobile delivers 32.98 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1), while the MX570 delivers 4.731 TFLOPS in both. Pixel rate is 189.8 GPixel/s versus 36.96 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 515.3 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s.

The bus interface differs: PCIe 4.0 x16 for the RTX 4090 Mobile versus PCIe 4.0 x8 for the MX570. Both are IGP slot width with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The release dates are also different: the RTX 4090 Mobile launched on 2023-01-02, while the MX570 launched on 2021-12-16.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison available is the Geekbench OpenCL test. The RTX 4090 Mobile scores 180,831, and the MX570 scores 38,299. The delta is 372.2% in favor of the RTX 4090 Mobile. This is not a marginal difference; it is a complete tier separation.

To contextualize the RTX 4090 Mobile's score, its nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 at 43,301 (0.8% ahead) and the NVIDIA RTX A6000 at 44,075 (0.9% behind). The RTX 4090 Mobile sits in a performance class with professional workstation GPUs.

The MX570's nearest rivals tell a different story. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile scores 38,349 (0.1% behind), the RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38,135 (0.4% ahead), and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X scores 38,706 (1.1% behind). The MX570 is competitive with mobile RTX-class GPUs in this specific average benchmark metric.

However, the MX570's average benchmark score of 38,299 is based on a single Geekbench OpenCL result. The RTX 4090 Mobile's average of 43,667 is derived from nine benchmarks including Passmark tests across DirectX 9, 10, 11, 12, G2D, G3D, and GPU compute. The breadth of the RTX 4090 Mobile's benchmark coverage shows consistent performance across multiple API generations.

The RTX 4090 Mobile's individual Passmark scores are instructive: 310 in DirectX 9, 173 in DirectX 10, 262 in DirectX 11, 107 in DirectX 12, 984 in G2D, 27,212 in G3D, and 12,347 in GPU compute. The MX570 has no comparable data points, so the full performance picture for the MX570 remains incomplete.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile for any workload requiring substantial GPU compute or graphics performance. Its 372.2% lead in Geekbench OpenCL over the MX570 is decisive. The RTX 4090 Mobile's 16 GB memory, 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 32.98 TFLOPS FP32 throughput position it for high-end gaming, 3D rendering, and compute acceleration.

The MX570 is the appropriate choice only when the 15 W TDP is a hard constraint. Its 2 GB memory and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth limit it to light graphics workloads. The MX570's percentile rank of 81 versus the RTX 4090 Mobile's 84 shows both are above-average GPUs, but the RTX 4090 Mobile is in a higher performance tier.

Benchmark results indicate the RTX 4090 Mobile competes with professional workstation GPUs like the Quadro M6000 and RTX A6000, with average scores within 0.9% of those parts. The MX570, by contrast, sits within 1.1% of mobile RTX-class GPUs like the RTX 5080 Mobile and RTX 4080 Mobile, but its single benchmark result limits confidence in that comparison.

For users selecting between these two, the decision hinges on power budget versus performance needs. A laptop with the RTX 4090 Mobile is a high-performance machine for demanding applications. A laptop with the MX570 is an ultraportable for basic graphics acceleration. The production status further clarifies the choice: the RTX 4090 Mobile is Active, while the MX570 is End-of-life.

The RTX 4090 Mobile is the clear performance winner. The MX570's only advantage is its dramatically lower power draw, which enables thinner and lighter designs with longer battery life. From the data available, there is no scenario where the MX570 outperforms the RTX 4090 Mobile in raw compute or graphics benchmarks.