NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 is a comparison of two graphics cards from different eras and completely different market segments. The RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop enthusiast card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, while the MX570 is a low-power mobile chip from the Ampere generation. The benchmark data shows a single head-to-head result, but the gulf between them is massive, making this less a contest and more a demonstration of tier separation. Here is the data-driven breakdown.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison available in the data is the Geekbench OpenCL test. This single result defines the entire competitive landscape between these two products.

• Geekbench OpenCL: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 172795, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 scores 38299. This gives the RTX 4070 SUPER a win with a delta of 351.2%. In practical terms, the RTX 4070 SUPER delivers more than four and a half times the raw compute performance of the MX570 in this specific test. This is not a marginal lead; it is a generational and segment-defining gap.

• Overall Win Count: The head-to-head data records 1 win for the RTX 4070 SUPER and 0 wins for the MX570. There is no benchmark in the provided data where the MX570 comes out ahead.

• Average Score Context: The RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43223, while the MX570 averages 38299. While the average score for the RTX 4070 SUPER is pulled down by other tests in its suite, the MX570's only recorded score is its OpenCL result, which is its average. The RTX 4070 SUPER's average is still 12.8% higher than the MX570's single score, even when diluted by its other benchmark results.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two GPUs is stark, reflecting their different purposes and release timelines.

• Process Node and Foundry: The RTX 4070 SUPER is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the MX570 uses an 8 nm process at Samsung. This node advantage is a primary driver of the efficiency and performance gap.

• Chip and Die: The RTX 4070 SUPER uses the AD104 chip with a die size of 294 mm² and a transistor count of 35,800 million. The MX570 uses the GA107S chip with a die size of 200 mm² and 8,700 million transistors. The RTX 4070 SUPER packs over four times the transistors into a die that is only about 47% larger, resulting in a transistor density of 121.8M / mm² versus 43.5M / mm² for the MX570.

• Core Configuration: The RTX 4070 SUPER features 7168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. The MX570 has 2048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The RTX 4070 SUPER has exactly 3.5 times the shading units and TMUs, and 2.5 times the ROPs.

• Ray Tracing and Tensor Cores: The RTX 4070 SUPER includes 56 ray tracing cores and 224 tensor cores. The MX570 includes 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, but the RTX 4070 SUPER has 3.5 times the RT and tensor core count, making it vastly more capable for ray-traced workloads and AI-accelerated features.

• Clock Speeds: The RTX 4070 SUPER has a base clock of 1980 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The MX570 has a base clock of 832 MHz and a boost clock of 1155 MHz. The RTX 4070 SUPER's boost clock is more than double the MX570's base clock, contributing significantly to its performance lead.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is significantly faster, scoring 172795 compared to the MX570's 38299, a delta of 351.2%.

Q: Does the MX570 have any benchmark wins over the RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: No. In the head-to-head data provided, the RTX 4070 SUPER records 1 win and the MX570 records 0 wins.

Q: How do their memory architectures compare?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER uses 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The MX570 uses 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 96.00 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has a TDP of 220 W and requires a 550 W power supply, using a 1x 16-pin connector. The MX570 has a TDP of 15 W, uses no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU listed.

Q: What is the difference in their production status?

A: Both are listed as End-of-life. The RTX 4070 SUPER was released on 2024-01-16, while the MX570 was released earlier on 2021-12-16.

Q: Which card has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER ranks in the 83rd percentile, while the MX570 ranks in the 81st percentile. Despite the massive performance gap, both are in the top quintile of all GPUs, though the RTX 4070 SUPER is higher.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two cards, highlighting the fundamental disparity in their designs.

• Process Node: 5 nm (RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 8 nm (MX570)
• Transistors: 35,800 million vs 8,700 million
• Die Size: 294 mm² vs 200 mm²
• Base Clock: 1980 MHz vs 832 MHz
• Boost Clock: 2475 MHz vs 1155 MHz
• Memory Size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
• Memory Type: GDDR6X vs GDDR6
• Memory Bus Width: 192 bit vs 64 bit
• Memory Bandwidth: 504.2 GB/s vs 96.00 GB/s
• Shading Units: 7168 vs 2048
• TMUs: 224 vs 64
• ROPs: 80 vs 32
• RT Cores: 56 vs 16
• Tensor Cores: 224 vs 64
• Pixel Rate: 198.0 GPixel/s vs 36.96 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 554.4 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s
• FP32 Performance: 35.48 TFLOPS vs 4.731 TFLOPS
• TDP: 220 W vs 15 W
• Slot Width: Dual-slot vs IGP
• Power Connectors: 1x 16-pin vs None
• Suggested PSU: 550 W vs None
• Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x16 vs PCIe 4.0 x8
• Display Outputs: 1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a vs Portable Device Dependent
• Release Date: 2024-01-16 vs 2021-12-16
• Launch MSRP: 599 USD vs None

Where Each One Wins

The data paints a clear picture of where each card excels, though the categories are vastly different.

• NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER: This card wins every performance metric. It dominates in raw compute (35.48 TFLOPS FP32 vs 4.731 TFLOPS), memory bandwidth (504.2 GB/s vs 96.00 GB/s), and texture/pixel fill rates. Its 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores make it far more suitable for modern gaming with ray tracing and DLSS features. The 12 GB GDDR6X frame buffer allows for high-resolution textures and future-proofing, whereas the MX570's 2 GB is a severe limitation. The RTX 4070 SUPER is unequivocally the winner for any demanding 3D workload.

• NVIDIA GeForce MX570: The MX570 wins on power efficiency. With a 15 W TDP versus the RTX 4070 SUPER's 220 W, it consumes a fraction of the power. It also requires no external power connectors and has no suggested PSU, making it a drop-in solution for thin-and-light laptops. Its IGP slot width means it is integrated into the motherboard, not a separate card. Its only advantage is operational efficiency and physical footprint, not performance.

The Verdict

The choice between these two is dictated entirely by the use case, as they are not competing in the same arena.

• Pick the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER if: You are building a desktop PC for high-end gaming, content creation, or any GPU-accelerated workload. The data shows it is 351.2% faster than the MX570 in OpenCL, has 3.5 times the shading units, and offers 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Its 83rd percentile ranking places it among the top GPUs, while its 12 GB VRAM and 56 RT cores make it a capable choice for modern titles. The 599 USD launch MSRP reflects its performance class.

• Pick the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 if: You need an ultra-low-power solution for a portable device where battery life and thermals are paramount. Its 15 W TDP is a fraction of the RTX 4070 SUPER's 220 W, and it requires no power connectors. It is suitable for basic display output and light 2D tasks. However, its 2 GB VRAM and 4.731 TFLOPS compute performance mean it is not designed for gaming or heavy rendering. Its 81st percentile ranking is high, but this is likely due to the narrow set of other low-power GPUs it is compared against.

In summary, the RTX 4070 SUPER is a performance powerhouse for a desktop system, while the MX570 is an efficiency-focused mobile chip. The benchmark results confirm that the RTX 4070 SUPER is in a completely different performance class, and the MX570 should only be considered for non-performance-critical, power-constrained applications.