NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a stark contrast between these two mobile graphics solutions. In the two shared tests, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile dominates the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A by a massive margin. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5090 Mobile scores 201,834 against the MX570 A's 39,780, a delta of 407.4%. The Vulkan test tells a similar story: 198,405 versus 37,601, with the RTX 5090 Mobile ahead by 427.7%. These are not incremental gains; they represent a generational chasm in compute capability.

The RTX 5090 Mobile's average benchmark score across all recorded tests reaches 45,152, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The MX570 A, by comparison, averages 38,691 across its two available tests, sitting in the 81st percentile. While the percentile gap looks modest, the raw score difference is substantial. The RTX 5090 Mobile's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45,384, a 0.5% deficit), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (44,795, a 0.8% lead), the Intel Arc A730M (45,592, a 1% deficit), and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45,972, a 1.8% deficit). This places it in the company of desktop-class discrete GPUs, not entry-level mobile parts.

The MX570 A's nearest rivals tell a different story. It sits within 1.1% of the AMD Radeon Pro 580X (38,706), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (38,349, a 0.9% lead), the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 (38,299, a 1% lead), and the AMD Radeon Pro 575X (39,116, a 1.1% deficit). These are older or lower-tier parts, and the MX570 A performs roughly on par with them. The data indicates the MX570 A is a competent entry-level chip, but it cannot approach the RTX 5090 Mobile's output.

Looking at the RTX 5090 Mobile's individual test results, the PassMark G3D score of 30,034 and GPU Compute score of 13,401 show strong rasterization and compute performance. The Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 201,834 and 198,405 respectively reinforce its position as a high-end part. The MX570 A lacks these additional benchmark entries, making direct comparison possible only through the two Geekbench tests, but those two tests are decisive enough.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these GPUs is fundamental. The RTX 5090 Mobile uses the GB203 chip built on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The MX570 A, in contrast, uses the GA107SB chip on the older Ampere architecture, built on Samsung's 8 nm process. It contains 8,700 million transistors across a 200 mm² die, with a density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. The RTX 5090 Mobile's newer node and larger die allow for a far more complex implementation.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The RTX 5090 Mobile carries 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a 9.3x difference in raw memory bandwidth, a factor that heavily impacts performance in memory-bound workloads. The RTX 5090 Mobile also runs its memory at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), while the MX570 A operates at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

Compute resources are equally lopsided. The RTX 5090 Mobile features 10,496 shading units, 328 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 82 RT cores, and 328 tensor cores. The MX570 A has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 16 RT cores, and 64 tensor cores. These figures translate into a pixel rate of 169.7 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 496.9 GTexel/s for the RTX 5090 Mobile, versus 36.96 GPixel/s and 73.92 GTexel/s for the MX570 A. FP32 throughput stands at 31.80 TFLOPS for the RTX 5090 Mobile and 4.731 TFLOPS for the MX570 A, a 6.7x gap.

Power and interface specifications also differ. The RTX 5090 Mobile has a TDP of 95 W, while the MX570 A draws only 25 W. Both use integrated form factors with no power connectors, and both rely on portable device dependent display outputs. The RTX 5090 Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the MX570 A uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical. The production status of the RTX 5090 Mobile is Active, with a release date of 2025-03-26, while the MX570 A is End-of-life, released 2021-12-16.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear hierarchy. The RTX 5090 Mobile is a flagship-class mobile GPU, ranking in the 84th percentile of all GPUs and competing with desktop parts like the RTX 4070 Ti. The MX570 A is an entry-level mobile chip, ranking in the 81st percentile and matching older workstation cards like the Radeon Pro 580X. In the two head-to-head tests, the RTX 5090 Mobile leads by over 400% in both OpenCL and Vulkan. No nuance exists in these results; the RTX 5090 Mobile wins every recorded comparison.

Users seeking maximum performance in a laptop should choose the RTX 5090 Mobile. Its 24 GB VRAM, 896 GB/s bandwidth, and 31.80 TFLOPS FP32 throughput make it suitable for demanding workloads such as high-resolution gaming, 3D rendering, and AI inference. The MX570 A, with 2 GB VRAM and 96 GB/s bandwidth, is limited to light tasks like basic photo editing, casual gaming at lower settings, or office productivity. Its 25 W TDP makes it suitable for ultra-thin laptops where battery life and thermals take priority.

The age difference matters. The RTX 5090 Mobile is an active, current-generation product from 2025. The MX570 A is end-of-life from 2021. The architectural gap between Blackwell 2.0 and Ampere is reflected in every measurable metric. For anyone building or buying a system today, the RTX 5090 Mobile is the only choice if performance is the goal. The MX570 A remains viable only for legacy systems or extremely power-constrained designs.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5090 Mobile than the MX570 A in OpenCL?

A: The RTX 5090 Mobile scores 201,834 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the MX570 A scores 39,780. This represents a 407.4% lead for the RTX 5090 Mobile.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between these two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5090 Mobile has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has better Vulkan performance?

A: The RTX 5090 Mobile scores 198,405 in Geekbench Vulkan, versus 37,601 for the MX570 A, a 427.7% advantage for the RTX 5090 Mobile.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5090 Mobile has a TDP of 95 W, while the MX570 A has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: When was each GPU released?

A: The RTX 5090 Mobile was released on 2025-03-26 and is currently in active production. The MX570 A was released on 2021-12-16 and is now end-of-life.

Q: How do their compute resources compare?

A: The RTX 5090 Mobile has 10,496 shading units, 328 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 82 RT cores, and 328 tensor cores. The MX570 A has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 16 RT cores, and 64 tensor cores.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5090 Mobile wins in every category where data exists. Its 31.80 TFLOPS FP32 throughput dwarfs the MX570 A's 4.731 TFLOPS. The 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and large datasets, while the MX570 A's 96.00 GB/s limits it to lighter workloads. The RTX 5090 Mobile's 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores enable hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration, features that the MX570 A's 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores provide only in a much more limited capacity.

For gaming, the RTX 5090 Mobile's 169.7 GPixel/s pixel rate and 496.9 GTexel/s texture rate can drive high refresh rate displays at demanding resolutions. The MX570 A's 36.96 GPixel/s and 73.92 GTexel/s are suited for 1080p gaming at modest settings. For content creation, the RTX 5090 Mobile's 24 GB VRAM allows large scenes and complex renders, while the MX570 A's 2 GB VRAM will hit capacity quickly.

The MX570 A does retain one advantage: power efficiency. At 25 W TDP, it consumes less than a third of the RTX 5090 Mobile's 95 W. This makes it viable for fanless or passively cooled designs, ultra-portable notebooks, and systems where battery life is paramount. The RTX 5090 Mobile requires more substantial cooling and power delivery, limiting its use to larger, performance-oriented laptops.

The RTX 5090 Mobile's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides twice the bandwidth of the MX570 A's PCIe 4.0 x8, which matters for external GPU enclosures or data transfer between CPU and GPU. Both GPUs support the same API set, so software compatibility is equal. The RTX 5090 Mobile's active production status ensures ongoing driver support and availability, while the MX570 A's end-of-life status means no further development.

In summary, the RTX 5090 Mobile is the clear winner for performance-sensitive applications, while the MX570 A serves a niche role in low-power, compact devices. The benchmark data leaves no ambiguity: 407.4% and 427.7% leads in the two shared tests define this matchup decisively.