NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A occupy opposite ends of the mobile graphics spectrum, and the benchmark data reflects this divide. The RTX 4090 Mobile is a top-tier part with an average benchmark score of 43,667, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, while the MX570 A is a low-power entry offering with an average score of 38,691, sitting in the 81st percentile. Despite the seemingly close percentile ranking, the head-to-head results reveal a massive performance gulf, with the RTX 4090 Mobile delivering over 354% higher scores in both available compute tests. The data shows two distinct use cases: one for uncompromising performance and another for basic acceleration in thin, power-conscious systems.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4090 Mobile wins decisively in raw compute and graphics throughput. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, it scores 180,831 against the MX570 A’s 39,780, a 354.6% advantage. Similarly, in Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 4090 Mobile posts 170,774 versus 37,601, a 354.2% lead. These results indicate the RTX 4090 Mobile is built for demanding workloads such as 3D rendering, video editing, and high-end gaming, where massive shading and tensor core counts translate directly into frame rates and render times. Its Passmark G3D score of 27,212 and GPU compute score of 12,347 further confirm its dominance in sustained, heavy graphics tasks.

The MX570 A, by contrast, has no benchmark wins in this comparison. Its 2 GB memory capacity and 4.731 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest it is suited for light tasks like office productivity, casual media playback, and basic photo editing, where the GPU can offload simple operations from the CPU. Its 25 W TDP makes it an ideal companion for ultraportable laptops where battery life and thermals take precedence over raw speed. The MX570 A’s 81st percentile ranking shows it is not a weak chip by general standards, but it competes in a different performance class entirely, one defined by efficiency rather than peak output.

The Verdict

From the data, the choice is unambiguous for users who need performance: the RTX 4090 Mobile is the only option. Its 354.6% lead in OpenCL and 354.2% lead in Vulkan mean that any application relying on GPU compute will finish tasks nearly four times faster. This extends to gaming at high resolutions and detail settings, where the 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for large textures and complex scenes. The RTX 4090 Mobile’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A6000, which is 0.9% faster on average, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000, which is 0.8% slower. This places it in professional workstation territory, capable of handling the most demanding creative and scientific workloads.

The MX570 A serves a different audience entirely. With no wins in this head-to-head, its value lies in what it does not consume: 25 W versus 120 W. For users who prioritize portability and quiet operation over performance, the MX570 A provides sufficient acceleration for everyday tasks without the thermal and power demands of a flagship GPU. Its 2 GB memory limit means it cannot handle modern AAA games or large datasets, but for web browsing, office suites, and streaming video, it is more than adequate. The MX570 A is end-of-life, which suggests it is a legacy part, while the RTX 4090 Mobile remains active in production. Users seeking a new system should consider the RTX 4090 Mobile for longevity, while those with basic needs might find the MX570 A acceptable if already installed in a budget laptop.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two available head-to-head benchmarks tell a consistent story of overwhelming RTX 4090 Mobile superiority. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4090 Mobile scores 180,831 against the MX570 A’s 39,780. The delta of 354.6% means the RTX 4090 Mobile completes OpenCL workloads approximately 4.5 times faster. This test exercises general-purpose GPU compute, including floating-point math and memory access patterns, where the RTX 4090 Mobile’s 9,728 shading units and 304 tensor cores provide a massive parallel throughput advantage over the MX570 A’s 2,048 shading units and 64 tensor cores.

Geekbench Vulkan shows a nearly identical margin: 170,774 for the RTX 4090 Mobile versus 37,601 for the MX570 A, a 354.2% difference. Vulkan is a low-level graphics API that stresses both the GPU’s rasterization pipeline and its compute units. The RTX 4090 Mobile’s 112 ROPs and 304 TMUs deliver pixel and texture fill rates that dwarf the MX570 A’s 32 ROPs and 64 TMUs. In practical terms, this means the RTX 4090 Mobile can render scenes at much higher resolutions and with more complex shaders while maintaining smooth frame rates, whereas the MX570 A would struggle with anything beyond basic 2D or very light 3D graphics. The consistency of the 354% delta across both APIs indicates that the performance gap is fundamental, rooted in every aspect of the GPU architecture, not just a single feature.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 43,667, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A has an average score of 38,691.

Q: How much faster is the RTX 4090 Mobile in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile scores 180,831 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 354.6% higher than the MX570 A’s score of 39,780.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile has a TDP of 120 W, while the MX570 A has a TDP of 25 W, making the MX570 A significantly more power-efficient.

Q: Which GPU has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 64-bit bus and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are both GPUs on the same manufacturing process?

A: No, the RTX 4090 Mobile uses TSMC’s 5 nm process, while the MX570 A uses Samsung’s 8 nm process.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile is listed as Active, while the MX570 A is listed as End-of-life.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 4090 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD103 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 121.1 million per mm². The MX570 A uses the Ampere architecture with the GA107SB chip, made on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It packs 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, for a density of 43.5 million per mm². The newer 5 nm node and larger die give the RTX 4090 Mobile a fundamental transistor count advantage that underpins its performance lead.

The RTX 4090 Mobile has 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. It also includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores. In contrast, the MX570 A has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 16 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores. The RTX 4090 Mobile’s shading unit count is 4.75 times higher, and its tensor core count is also 4.75 times higher, which directly explains its massive FP32 and FP16 throughput of 32.98 TFLOPS versus 4.731 TFLOPS. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but the RTX 4090 Mobile has the hardware resources to take full advantage of these APIs’ advanced features.

Specification Differences

The RTX 4090 Mobile has a base clock of 1335 MHz and a boost clock of 1695 MHz, while the MX570 A runs at 832 MHz base and 1155 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ: the RTX 4090 Mobile runs at 2250 MHz with an 18 Gbps effective data rate, while the MX570 A runs at 1500 MHz with a 12 Gbps effective rate. The RTX 4090 Mobile’s memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s is exactly six times the MX570 A’s 96.00 GB/s, reflecting the wider 256-bit bus versus 64-bit.

Pixel and texture rates scale accordingly. The RTX 4090 Mobile achieves 189.8 GPixel/s and 515.3 GTexel/s, compared to 36.96 GPixel/s and 73.92 GTexel/s for the MX570 A. The bus interface differs as well: the RTX 4090 Mobile uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the MX570 A uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Both are integrated into the system as IGP with no power connectors, but the RTX 4090 Mobile’s 120 W TDP is nearly five times the MX570 A’s 25 W. The RTX 4090 Mobile was released on 2023-01-02, while the MX570 A came earlier on 2021-12-16. Neither has a launch MSRP listed. The RTX 4090 Mobile has a successor in the GeForce 50 Mobile series, while the MX570 A has no listed predecessor or successor.