NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile Comparison

The benchmark data places the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A in the same overall performance percentile (81st), yet their actual scores and architectural approaches could not be more different. The RTX 4080 Mobile is a dominant force, delivering over 300% higher scores in every shared test, while the MX570 A is a low-power, end-of-life part that barely registers against its newer, larger rival. The data shows a clear hierarchy: the RTX 4080 Mobile is in a different performance class entirely, despite the misleadingly similar percentile ranking.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two GPUs share only two benchmark results in the data: Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan. In both, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile wins decisively. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 4080 Mobile scores 159575, while the MX570 A manages just 39780. This translates to a delta of 301.1%, meaning the RTX 4080 Mobile is roughly four times faster. The story repeats in Geekbench Vulkan: the RTX 4080 Mobile posts 145807 against the MX570 A’s 36236, a 302.4% advantage.

These aren’t marginal wins; they are generational and architectural obliterations. The RTX 4080 Mobile’s closest rival in the overall average benchmark score is the NVIDIA CMP 70HX, which sits just 0.2% ahead. The MX570 A, by contrast, is 0.3% behind the RTX 4080 Mobile in average score, yet its individual test results are a fraction of the flagship mobile part. The data indicates that the MX570 A’s average is buoyed by its limited test set—only two Geekbench entries—whereas the RTX 4080 Mobile has nine benchmark results, including Passmark DX9, DX10, DX11, DX12, G2D, G3D, and compute tests.

The RTX 4080 Mobile’s Passmark results further illustrate its breadth: a G3D score of 24926 and a GPU compute score of 11191. The MX570 A has no Passmark data, so the head-to-head remains confined to Geekbench, but the pattern is unambiguous. The RTX 4080 Mobile wins both head-to-head tests, with a combined win count of 2 versus 0. No benchmark in the shared set favors the MX570 A.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on entirely different architectures and process nodes. The RTX 4080 Mobile uses the AD104 chip on TSMC’s 5 nm process, while the MX570 A uses the GA107SB chip on Samsung’s 8 nm node. This process gap is significant: the 5 nm node allows for 121.8 million transistors per square millimeter, compared to 43.5 million on the 8 nm node. The RTX 4080 Mobile packs 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, whereas the MX570 A has just 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die.

The core configurations diverge sharply. The RTX 4080 Mobile features 7424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 80 raster operation units (ROPs). The MX570 A has 2048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Ray tracing and tensor core counts follow suit: the RTX 4080 Mobile has 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores, while the MX570 A has 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores. The compute throughput reflects this gap—the RTX 4080 Mobile delivers 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1), while the MX570 A manages 4.731 TFLOPS in both.

Memory subsystems are equally disparate. The RTX 4080 Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with 96.00 GB/s. Effective memory speeds differ: 18 Gbps for the RTX 4080 Mobile versus 12 Gbps for the MX570 A. The RTX 4080 Mobile also has a wider PCIe interface (x16 versus x8), both on PCIe 4.0. Power consumption is a major differentiator: the RTX 4080 Mobile is rated at 110 W TDP, while the MX570 A draws just 25 W. Both are integrated (IGP) with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4080 Mobile wins every scenario where raw performance matters. Its 301.1% lead in OpenCL and 302.4% lead in Vulkan make it the obvious choice for gaming, content creation, or any GPU-accelerated workload that leverages compute or rendering. The data shows it excels in both API environments, with a Vulkan score of 145807 that is nearly four times the MX570 A’s 36236. Its higher pixel rate (133.2 GPixel/s versus 36.96 GPixel/s) and texture rate (386.3 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s) further cement its dominance for resolution-heavy tasks.

The MX570 A’s only advantage is power efficiency, though the benchmark data does not directly measure this. Its 25 W TDP versus 110 W suggests it can operate in thinner, cooler, and longer-lasting laptops. However, the benchmark scores indicate that this efficiency comes at a massive performance cost. The MX570 A’s FP32 throughput of 4.731 TFLOPS is less than one-fifth of the RTX 4080 Mobile’s 24.72 TFLOPS. For users who prioritize battery life over frame rates, the MX570 A could suffice for light tasks, but the data provides no benchmark where it wins.

The RTX 4080 Mobile also has a production status of “Active,” while the MX570 A is marked “End-of-life.” This suggests the MX570 A is being phased out, while the RTX 4080 Mobile remains a current product. The RTX 4080 Mobile’s release date is 2023-01-02, over a year after the MX570 A’s 2021-12-16 launch, and it belongs to the GeForce 40 Mobile generation, succeeding the GeForce 30 Mobile. The MX570 A has no predecessor or successor listed.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 4080 Mobile than the MX570 A in OpenCL?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile scores 159575 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the MX570 A scores 39780. This is a 301.1% delta, meaning the RTX 4080 Mobile is over four times faster.

Q: Do the two GPUs have the same average benchmark score?

A: No. The RTX 4080 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 38135, while the MX570 A has 38008. The RTX 4080 Mobile is 0.3% ahead, but this narrow margin is misleading because the MX570 A only has two benchmark results.

Q: Which GPU has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s.

Q: What are the process node differences?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile is fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm node, while the MX570 A uses Samsung’s 8 nm node. The 5 nm node has a transistor density of 121.8M per mm², versus 43.5M per mm² for the 8 nm node.

Q: Are both GPUs still in production?

A: No. The RTX 4080 Mobile is marked “Active,” while the MX570 A is marked “End-of-life.”

Q: Which GPU has higher ray tracing core counts?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has 58 RT cores, while the MX570 A has 16 RT cores.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The RTX 4080 Mobile uses the AD104 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, with 35,800 million transistors and a 294 mm² die size. The MX570 A uses the GA107SB chip on an 8 nm Samsung process, with 8,700 million transistors and a 200 mm² die. Transistor density is 121.8M / mm² versus 43.5M / mm².

Clock speeds diverge: the RTX 4080 Mobile runs at 1290 MHz base and 1665 MHz boost, while the MX570 A runs at 832 MHz base and 1155 MHz boost. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the RTX 4080 Mobile, versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for the MX570 A. Memory size is 12 GB versus 2 GB, bus width is 192-bit versus 64-bit, and bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s versus 96.00 GB/s.

Core counts: shading units are 7424 versus 2048, TMUs are 232 versus 64, ROPs are 80 versus 32, RT cores are 58 versus 16, and tensor cores are 232 versus 64. Pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s versus 36.96 GPixel/s, texture rate is 386.3 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s, and FP32/FP16 compute is 24.72 TFLOPS versus 4.731 TFLOPS. TDP is 110 W versus 25 W. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x8. Release dates are 2023-01-02 versus 2021-12-16. Production status is Active versus End-of-life. The generation is GeForce 40 Mobile versus GeForce MX (5xx).

The Verdict

The data is unequivocal: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the superior GPU for any performance-oriented task. It wins both head-to-head benchmarks by over 300%, has roughly five times the FP32 throughput, and offers four times the memory capacity and bandwidth. Its 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs is matched by the MX570 A, but that parity is an artifact of the MX570 A’s sparse benchmark data—only two Geekbench tests—versus the RTX 4080 Mobile’s nine comprehensive results.

The MX570 A is a low-power, end-of-life part with a 25 W TDP, suited only for the most power-constrained laptops where battery life trumps all else. Its 4.731 TFLOPS FP32 and 2 GB memory are sufficient for basic tasks, but the data shows it cannot compete in any shared benchmark. The RTX 4080 Mobile, despite its 110 W TDP, delivers 24.72 TFLOPS and 12 GB memory, making it the clear choice for gaming, rendering, or compute workloads.

Users should pick the RTX 4080 Mobile if they need performance and are willing to accept higher power draw. The MX570 A should only be considered for ultra-portable devices where 25 W is a hard limit, and even then, the benchmark results indicate severe compromises. The RTX 4080 Mobile is active and current; the MX570 A is end-of-life. For any user prioritizing speed, the verdict is the RTX 4080 Mobile by a landslide.