NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A occupy opposite ends of the GeForce spectrum, and the benchmark data reflects a chasm in raw performance. In the two shared head-to-head tests, the RTX 4070 SUPER delivers a commanding victory, but the MX570 A’s role as a low-power mobile part means the comparison hinges on context rather than contest.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data shows a decisive sweep for the RTX 4070 SUPER in the two overlapping tests. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4070 SUPER scores 172,795, while the MX570 A manages 39,780. That is a deltaPct of 334.4%, meaning the RTX 4070 SUPER is roughly four and a half times faster in this compute workload. The margin widens further in Geekbench Vulkan, where the RTX 4070 SUPER posts 205,624 against the MX570 A’s 37,601 — a deltaPct of 446.9%. This indicates that the RTX 4070 SUPER’s advantage grows when the API scales across its larger hardware resource pool, likely due to its massive shading unit count and memory bandwidth.

Across the entire benchmark suite, the RTX 4070 SUPER accumulates an avgBenchmarkScore of 43,223, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, scores 43,262, a negligible 0.1% difference, while the RTX 4090 Mobile trails by 1%. The MX570 A, in contrast, averages 38,691, sitting at the 81st percentile. Notably, its closest competitor is the AMD Radeon Pro 580X at 38,706, which is a 0% delta — essentially a statistical tie. The MX570 A also edges out the GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile by 0.9% and the MX570 by 1%, showing that within its own performance tier, it is competitive, but that tier is far below the 40-series desktop card.

The biggest single-test win for the RTX 4070 SUPER appears in Passmark G3D, where it scores 29,995, a figure that dwarfs any score the MX570 A could approach given its absence from that test list. Similarly, the RTX 4070 SUPER’s Passmark GPU Compute score of 17,108 and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,627 highlight strengths in both rasterization and modern API workloads. The MX570 A’s only benchmark entries are the two Geekbench tests, which is itself an indicator of its limited scope — it is not designed for the same synthetic stress loads.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 SUPER wins every metric where both are measured, but the MX570 A’s strengths lie outside raw benchmark scores. The MX570 A has a TDP of 25 W, making it an IGP-class part with no power connectors and a bus interface of PCIe 4.0 x8. This means it wins on portability and integration — it is built for thin-and-light laptops where sustained high performance is secondary to battery life and thermal headroom. Its 2 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus delivers 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for light productivity and older titles, but not for modern AAA gaming at high settings.

The RTX 4070 SUPER, by contrast, wins on every performance-driven use case. Its 12 GB GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus offers 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is over five times the MX570 A’s throughput. This enables high-resolution texture streaming and ray tracing workloads, supported by 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores. The data shows a clear split: the MX570 A is a capable basic display adapter, while the RTX 4070 SUPER is a high-end desktop GPU for gaming, content creation, and compute tasks.

In terms of benchmark wins, the headToHead data shows 2 wins for the RTX 4070 SUPER and 0 for the MX570 A. However, the MX570 A’s 81st percentile ranking suggests it outperforms a majority of all GPUs in the database, likely due to its efficiency rather than absolute speed. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s 83rd percentile is only slightly higher, indicating that its raw power places it in the top tier, but the percentile gap (2 points) is far smaller than the score gap (4,532 points). This suggests the MX570 A’s modest performance is still above average for integrated or low-power parts.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is generational. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses the AD104 chip on TSMC’s 5 nm process, packing 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The MX570 A uses the GA107SB chip on Samsung’s 8 nm process, with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, for a density of 43.5M per mm². The 5 nm node allows the RTX 4070 SUPER to pack over four times the transistors into a die that is less than 50% larger by area, explaining its massive compute advantage.

Core counts follow the same pattern. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 7,168 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, while the MX570 A has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. This translates to a pixel rate of 198.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s for the RTX 4070 SUPER, versus 36.96 GPixel/s and 73.92 GTexel/s for the MX570 A. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s FP32 compute is 35.48 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), while the MX570 A manages 4.731 TFLOPS for both. That is a 7.5x difference in raw floating-point throughput.

Memory architecture also diverges sharply. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s 192-bit GDDR6X interface provides 504.2 GB/s, while the MX570 A’s 64-bit GDDR6 bus provides 96.00 GB/s. Clock speeds tell a similar story: the RTX 4070 SUPER boosts to 2475 MHz from a 1980 MHz base, whereas the MX570 A boosts to 1155 MHz from an 832 MHz base. The RTX 4070 SUPER also features a 16-pin power connector and requires a 550 W suggested PSU, while the MX570 A has no connectors and draws power from the motherboard — a reflection of its 25 W TDP versus 220 W.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning API feature parity exists, but the hardware beneath is wildly different. The RTX 4070 SUPER is a dual-slot card at 267 mm long, while the MX570 A has no fixed dimensions, being designed for portable devices. The RTX 4070 SUPER was released on 2024-01-16, over two years after the MX570 A’s 2021-12-16 launch, and the 4070 SUPER’s predecessor is GeForce 30, with successor GeForce 50, whereas the MX570 A has no declared predecessor or successor.

The Verdict

From the data, the RTX 4070 SUPER is the clear choice for any user needing high-end performance. Its 334.4% lead in OpenCL and 446.9% lead in Vulkan over the MX570 A are not incremental; they are generational leaps. With 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, it handles demanding workloads — 4K gaming, ray tracing, AI inference — with headroom. Its 83rd percentile ranking and near-tie with the Quadro M6000 24 GB (0.1% delta) confirm it sits at the top of the desktop heap. Its launch MSRP is 599 USD.

The MX570 A, however, is not a competitor to the RTX 4070 SUPER; it is a different product category. Its 25 W TDP and IGP slot width make it suitable for ultraportable laptops where battery life is paramount. Its 81st percentile ranking shows it outperforms most GPUs in the database, but that is because the database includes many weaker integrated parts. For a user who needs a discrete GPU for light gaming and media, the MX570 A’s 2 GB memory and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth are adequate, but they will hit walls in modern titles or creative applications.

Benchmark results indicate that no user should choose the MX570 A for performance parity with the RTX 4070 SUPER — the score difference is too vast. Instead, the decision rests on form factor and power envelope. If the use case demands a desktop tower with a 220 W card, the RTX 4070 SUPER wins outright. If the use case requires a fanless, connector-free IGP in a thin chassis, the MX570 A is the only viable option between the two. The data does not support any scenario where the MX570 A outperforms the RTX 4070 SUPER, but it does support the MX570 A as a capable low-power solution for specific mobile environments.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 4070 SUPER than the MX570 A in Geekbench Vulkan?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER scores 205,624 versus 37,601 for the MX570 A, a deltaPct of 446.9%.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, while the MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor density?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 121.8M transistors per mm² on a 5 nm TSMC process, versus 43.5M per mm² for the MX570 A on an 8 nm Samsung process.

Q: Are both GPUs compatible with DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), as well as OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has an avgBenchmarkScore of 43,223, while the MX570 A scores 38,691.

Q: Which GPU has a higher TDP?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has a TDP of 220 W, while the MX570 A has a TDP of 25 W.