NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X represent two very different approaches to GPU design, separated by six years of architectural evolution. The data shows a clear overall winner in raw performance, but a more complex picture emerges when examining the specific workloads and the technological trade-offs. The GTX TITAN X wins both head-to-head benchmarks, yet the MX570 A demonstrates how modern efficiency and feature support can partially offset a deficit in brute-force compute. The benchmark results indicate that the GTX TITAN X holds a commanding lead in both tested APIs, but the nature of that lead and the context of each card's intended use case reveal a fascinating generational divide.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data is unambiguous in its outcome, with the GTX TITAN X emerging victorious in both of the shared tests. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the GTX TITAN X scores 41,471 against the MX570 A's 39,780, a modest delta of -4.1% from the perspective of the MX570 A. This slim margin in OpenCL is surprising given the massive disparity in memory bandwidth and shading units between the two cards. The older Maxwell architecture, with its 3072 shading units and 336.6 GB/s of bandwidth, still manages to outperform the newer Ampere chip by a noticeable, if not overwhelming, margin in this compute-heavy workload. The MX570 A's 4.731 TFLOPS of FP32 performance trails the GTX TITAN X's 6.691 TFLOPS, which helps explain the OpenCL result.

The Vulkan benchmark tells a more dramatic story. Here, the GTX TITAN X scores 49,397, a full 23.9% ahead of the MX570 A's 37,601. This is a substantial gap that highlights the GTX TITAN X's superiority in graphics-oriented workloads. The Vulkan API tends to favor raw throughput and memory bandwidth, both of which are heavily in the GTX TITAN X's favor. Its 384-bit bus and 336.6 GB/s bandwidth dwarf the MX570 A's 64-bit bus and 96.00 GB/s, which directly impacts texture-heavy and high-resolution rendering tasks. The MX570 A's 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores provide no benefit in this test, as neither is leveraged by the standard Vulkan benchmark. The result is a clear statement: for pure graphics compute, the older flagship still dominates.

While the GTX TITAN X wins both tests, it is worth remembering the MX570 A's average benchmark score of 38,691 is actually higher than the GTX TITAN X's average of 36,530. This is due to the GTX TITAN X also having a Geekbench Metal score of 18,723, which drags down its average. The MX570 A has no Metal benchmark listed, so its average is derived solely from its two higher-scoring tests. This quirk of the data means that the average scores do not reflect the head-to-head results, and the GTX TITAN X's performance in Vulkan is its standout achievement.

Where Each One Wins

The data suggests a clear split in use cases. The GTX TITAN X is the winner for any application that relies on traditional graphics rendering, as evidenced by its dominant Vulkan score. Its 12 GB of GDDR5 memory, massive 384-bit bus, and 96 ROPs make it well-suited for high-resolution gaming and content creation at large frame buffers. The 209.1 GTexel/s texture rate and 104.5 GPixel/s pixel rate are more than double the MX570 A's figures, indicating superior performance in fill-rate-limited scenarios. For users running modern games at 4K or working with large textures, the GTX TITAN X's memory subsystem is the decisive advantage.

The MX570 A, conversely, is a card designed for a completely different environment. Its 25 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate it is meant for thin-and-light laptops where power consumption is critical. The data shows it is no slouch in compute, with its OpenCL score only 4.1% behind the GTX TITAN X. This suggests that for compute tasks like machine learning inference or general-purpose GPU computing, the MX570 A can hold its own despite its smaller memory footprint. The presence of 64 tensor cores and 16 RT cores gives it a feature advantage for workloads that support these accelerators, even if the standard benchmarks do not test them directly. For users who need a capable GPU in a power-constrained device, the MX570 A's efficiency is its primary win.

The GTX TITAN X also wins on raw memory capacity, offering 12 GB versus the MX570 A's 2 GB. This six-fold difference is not just a spec sheet advantage; it has practical implications for loading large datasets or running multiple applications simultaneously. However, the MX570 A counters with newer memory technology, using GDDR6 at 12 Gbps effective versus the GTX TITAN X's GDDR5 at 7 Gbps. While the bus width limits the MX570 A's total bandwidth, the newer memory type shows that NVIDIA did not entirely neglect the memory subsystem in this low-power part.

The Verdict

The data points to the GTX TITAN X as the clear choice for anyone prioritizing raw performance. Its 23.9% lead in Vulkan is a decisive margin that cannot be ignored. A user looking to play demanding games or run graphics-intensive applications should select the GTX TITAN X without hesitation. The card's 80th percentile ranking versus all GPUs, combined with its 6.691 TFLOPS of FP32 power, makes it a formidable, if aging, performer. Its launch MSRP was 999 USD, positioning it as a premium product at its time of release.

The MX570 A is the pick for a different kind of user. Its 81st percentile ranking is actually one point higher than the GTX TITAN X's 80th, which reflects its balanced performance across its tested benchmarks. The data suggests that for users who primarily run compute workloads that are not memory-bandwidth-bound, the MX570 A offers near-parity with the GTX TITAN X in OpenCL while consuming a fraction of the power. Its 25 W TDP means it can be integrated into systems without dedicated power connectors, a significant advantage for portability. The MX570 A is the rational choice for a mobile workstation where battery life and thermal management are paramount, and where the software stack can leverage its tensor and RT cores.

Ultimately, the choice comes down to what matters more: the GTX TITAN X's overwhelming graphics lead or the MX570 A's efficiency and modern feature set. The benchmark data does not support the MX570 A as a replacement for the GTX TITAN X in gaming, but it does support it as a superior solution for specific, power-sensitive compute tasks. The GTX TITAN X is the performance king; the MX570 A is the efficiency champion.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A has a higher average benchmark score of 38,691, compared to the GTX TITAN X's 36,530. This is despite the GTX TITAN X winning both head-to-head tests, as its Metal benchmark score of 18,723 lowers its average.

Q: How much faster is the GTX TITAN X in Vulkan?

A: The GTX TITAN X scores 49,397 in the Geekbench Vulkan test, which is 23.9% higher than the MX570 A's 37,601 score.

Q: What is the memory size difference between the two cards?

A: The GTX TITAN X has 12 GB of GDDR5 memory, while the MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6 memory. The GTX TITAN X also has a much wider 384-bit bus compared to the MX570 A's 64-bit bus.

Q: Does the MX570 A support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the MX570 A is based on the Ampere architecture and includes 16 RT cores. The GTX TITAN X, based on Maxwell 2.0, has no RT cores.

Q: What is the TDP of each card?

A: The MX570 A has a TDP of 25 W, while the GTX TITAN X has a TDP of 250 W. The MX570 A uses no power connectors, whereas the GTX TITAN X requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin connector.

Q: Which card is more recent?

A: The MX570 A has a release date of 2021-12-16, while the GTX TITAN X was released on 2015-03-16.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures, reflecting the generational leap between them. The MX570 A uses the GA107SB chip, based on the Ampere architecture, manufactured on an 8 nm process by Samsung. This chip contains 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². In contrast, the GTX TITAN X uses the GM200 chip, based on the Maxwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 28 nm process by TSMC. The GM200 packs 8,000 million transistors onto a much larger 601 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of just 13.3M per mm². This density difference is a direct result of the more advanced manufacturing node used for the newer card.

The Ampere architecture in the MX570 A introduces features that are entirely absent from the Maxwell 2.0 GTX TITAN X. The MX570 A includes 16 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and 64 tensor cores for AI processing, while the GTX TITAN X has neither. The API support also differs, with the MX570 A offering DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and the GTX TITAN X limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, but the MX570 A's newer architecture is designed to handle more advanced rendering techniques.

The memory architectures are also a point of divergence. The MX570 A uses GDDR6 memory with a 64-bit bus and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth, while the GTX TITAN X uses GDDR5 with a 384-bit bus and 336.6 GB/s bandwidth. The GTX TITAN X's wider bus is a legacy of its flagship desktop design, while the MX570 A's narrow bus is optimized for low power consumption. The shading unit counts reflect this as well, with the GTX TITAN X offering 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, versus the MX570 A's 2048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs.

Specification Differences

The most striking difference in specifications is the power envelope. The MX570 A has a TDP of 25 W and is classified as IGP slot width, meaning it is integrated into a system without a dedicated expansion slot. The GTX TITAN X, by contrast, has a TDP of 250 W and is a dual-slot card, requiring a 600 W suggested PSU and both a 6-pin and an 8-pin power connector. This difference dictates their physical and thermal design, with the MX570 A being suited for portable devices and the GTX TITAN X for desktop towers.

Memory specifications differ significantly. The MX570 A offers 2 GB of GDDR6 with a 64-bit bus and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The GTX TITAN X provides 12 GB of GDDR5 with a 384-bit bus and 336.6 GB/s bandwidth. The clock speeds are also divergent, with the MX570 A having a base clock of 832 MHz and a boost of 1155 MHz, while the GTX TITAN X has a higher base of 1000 MHz and a boost of 1089 MHz. Memory clocks show the MX570 A at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) versus the GTX TITAN X's 1753 MHz (7 Gbps effective).

The bus interface is another differentiator. The MX570 A uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the GTX TITAN X uses PCIe 3.0 x16. The MX570 A's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," while the GTX TITAN X offers 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, and 3x DisplayPort 1.2. The GTX TITAN X has physical dimensions of 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 38 mm in width, while the MX570 A has no listed dimensions, consistent with its IGP form factor. The MX570 A has no launch MSRP, while the GTX TITAN X had a launch MSRP of 999 USD.