NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200 Comparison

The benchmark data separates these two NVIDIA cards into distinct eras with distinct strengths. The GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK, a 2014 flagship, and the Quadro P2200, a 2019 professional card, do not simply trade blows; they dominate in different software environments. The Quadro P2200 wins the majority of head-to-head tests, but the TITAN BLACK holds a narrow lead in several DirectX workloads, making the choice entirely dependent on the application.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive victory belongs to the Quadro P2200 in the Passmark DirectX 9 test, where it scores 167 against the TITAN BLACK’s 133. This 20.4% margin is the largest in the entire comparison. The performance gap is nearly as stark in the Passmark G2D test, with the Quadro P2200 scoring 881 versus 595 for the TITAN BLACK, a 32.5% advantage. This indicates a substantial lead in 2D and legacy graphics acceleration.

In modern compute APIs, the Quadro P2200 also takes the lead. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 32344 against 27218 for the TITAN BLACK, a 15.8% advantage. The Geekbench Vulkan result is closer, with the Quadro P2200 scoring 31351 versus 29561, a 5.7% lead. The Quadro P2200 also edges out the TITAN BLACK in Passmark G3D, scoring 9364 versus 9184, a marginal 1.9% difference, and in Passmark GPU Compute, scoring 3921 versus 3726, a 5% lead.

The TITAN BLACK’s wins are narrower but consistent across the older DirectX feature levels. It wins Passmark DirectX 10 with a score of 47 versus 45, a 4.4% margin. It also wins Passmark DirectX 11 with a score of 73 versus 70, a 4.3% margin. In Passmark DirectX 12, the TITAN BLACK scores 34 versus 33, a 3% advantage. While these wins are smaller in percentage terms, they show the TITAN BLACK retains a performance edge in specific legacy API scenarios.

The overall win count is 6 for the Quadro P2200 and 3 for the TITAN BLACK, but the distribution of those wins is telling. The Quadro P2200’s victories are often by wide margins in modern or 2D-centric workloads, while the TITAN BLACK’s wins are concentrated in the DirectX 10/11/12 group with single-digit percentage leads.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The TITAN BLACK uses the GK110B chip on the Kepler architecture, manufactured on a 28 nm process at TSMC. The Quadro P2200 uses the GP106 chip on the Pascal architecture, manufactured on a more advanced 16 nm process, also at TSMC. This process shrink is a key reason for the Quadro P2200’s efficiency and higher clock speeds.

The transistor counts and die sizes reflect this generational gap. The TITAN BLACK packs 7,080 million transistors on a 561 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 12.6M / mm². The Quadro P2200 has 4,400 million transistors on a much smaller 200 mm² die, giving it a higher density of 22.0M / mm². The TITAN BLACK is a larger, more complex chip, while the Quadro P2200 is a more modern, denser design.

The memory subsystems are also completely different. The TITAN BLACK features 6 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Quadro P2200 offers 5 GB of GDDR5X memory on a 160-bit bus, with a lower bandwidth of 200.2 GB/s. The TITAN BLACK has a clear theoretical bandwidth advantage, but the Quadro P2200’s GDDR5X memory operates at a higher effective speed of 10 Gbps versus 7 Gbps.

Compute resources differ substantially. The TITAN BLACK has 2880 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The Quadro P2200 has 1280 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 40 ROPs. Despite having fewer than half the shading units, the Quadro P2200 achieves comparable or better performance in many tests due to its higher clocks and architectural efficiency. The TITAN BLACK has a base clock of 889 MHz and a boost clock of 980 MHz, while the Quadro P2200 has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 1493 MHz.

Power and physical specifications also diverge sharply. The TITAN BLACK has a 250 W TDP, requires a 600 W power supply, and uses dual-slot cooling with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors. The Quadro P2200 has a 75 W TDP, needs only a 250 W power supply, and is a single-slot card with no power connectors. The TITAN BLACK is also longer at 267 mm compared to 201 mm for the Quadro P2200.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: the Quadro P2200 is the superior card for modern, compute-heavy, and 2D-oriented workloads. Its wins in Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan, along with its dominance in DirectX 9 and G2D, show it is better suited for contemporary software environments. The 15.8% lead in OpenCL and 20.4% lead in DirectX 9 are not trivial; they represent a significant real-world performance advantage in those specific APIs.

The TITAN BLACK’s narrow wins in DirectX 10, 11, and 12 are noteworthy but do not compensate for its losses. Its 4.4% lead in DirectX 10 and 4.3% lead in DirectX 11 are within a range that could be considered a tie in practical terms. The data suggests that in these legacy scenarios, the TITAN BLACK is competitive but not decisively faster.

The Quadro P2200’s architectural advantages, particularly the 16 nm process and higher boost clock of 1493 MHz, appear to overcome the TITAN BLACK’s raw resource advantage of 2880 shading units. This is the key insight from the benchmark data: clock speed and architecture efficiency can outweigh a massive core count difference. The TITAN BLACK’s higher memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s does not translate into benchmark wins, indicating that memory bandwidth is not the limiting factor in these tests.

For a user prioritizing modern API performance, professional compute, or low power consumption, the Quadro P2200 is the clear winner from the data. For a user running only legacy DirectX 10 or 11 applications, the TITAN BLACK holds a slight edge, but the margin is small enough that it is unlikely to be a deciding factor in most real-world scenarios.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ on nearly every major specification. The most fundamental difference is the process node, with the TITAN BLACK on 28 nm and the Quadro P2200 on 16 nm. The chip designs are also different, with the GK110B versus GP106. The TITAN BLACK has a larger die at 561 mm² versus 200 mm², and a higher transistor count at 7,080 million versus 4,400 million.

Clock speeds favor the Quadro P2200, which has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 1493 MHz, compared to 889 MHz and 980 MHz for the TITAN BLACK. The memory configuration differs in size, type, and bandwidth: 6 GB GDDR5 with 336.0 GB/s for the TITAN BLACK versus 5 GB GDDR5X with 200.2 GB/s for the Quadro P2200. The TITAN BLACK has more shading units (2880 vs 1280), TMUs (240 vs 80), and ROPs (48 vs 40).

Power consumption is a major differentiator. The TITAN BLACK has a 250 W TDP and requires a 600 W power supply, while the Quadro P2200 has a 75 W TDP and requires a 250 W power supply. The TITAN BLACK is dual-slot with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, while the Quadro P2200 is single-slot with no power connectors. The TITAN BLACK is longer at 267 mm versus 201 mm.

Display outputs also differ, with the TITAN BLACK offering 2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, and 1x DisplayPort 1.2, while the Quadro P2200 offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The DirectX support also differs, with the TITAN BLACK supporting DirectX 12 (11_1) and the Quadro P2200 supporting DirectX 12 (12_1). The Vulkan API support is higher on the Quadro P2200, at version 1.4 versus 1.2.175.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK has a higher memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s, compared to 200.2 GB/s for the NVIDIA Quadro P2200.

Q: What is the performance difference in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro P2200 scores 32344 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 15.8% higher than the TITAN BLACK’s score of 27218.

Q: Which card wins in Passmark DirectX 9?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro P2200 wins with a score of 167, which is 20.4% higher than the TITAN BLACK’s score of 133.

Q: Does the TITAN BLACK win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the TITAN BLACK wins Passmark DirectX 10, DirectX 11, and DirectX 12, with scores of 47, 73, and 34 respectively. These wins are by margins of 4.4%, 4.3%, and 3%.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two cards?

A: The GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK has a TDP of 250 W, while the Quadro P2200 has a TDP of 75 W.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK has 2880 shading units, while the Quadro P2200 has 1280 shading units.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA Quadro P2200 is the clear winner for modern compute workloads. Its 15.8% lead in Geekbench OpenCL and 5.7% lead in Geekbench Vulkan make it the better choice for applications that leverage these APIs. Its 32.5% advantage in Passmark G2D also makes it the better option for 2D-heavy tasks like desktop rendering and CAD interface work. The 20.4% lead in DirectX 9 suggests it is also better for older games or applications that still rely on that API. The Quadro P2200 is also the obvious choice for power-constrained environments, given its 75 W TDP versus the TITAN BLACK’s 250 W TDP.

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK wins in a narrow band of legacy DirectX benchmarks. It has a 4.4% lead in DirectX 10 and a 4.3% lead in DirectX 11, making it the better choice for a system that runs only those specific API workloads. Its 3% lead in DirectX 12 is also a point in its favor, though the margin is small. The TITAN BLACK’s higher memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s could be a factor in memory-bound scenarios, although the benchmark data does not show this translating into wins in the tested applications. For a user with a legacy application locked to DirectX 10 or 11, the TITAN BLACK offers a slight but measurable performance advantage.