NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison: the GTX 750 and the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER do not share a single common benchmark test in the database. The GTX 750 has scores for Geekbench Metal, OpenCL, and Vulkan, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has one score for 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Consequently, direct wins cannot be assigned from overlapping tests.

Instead, the use-case split emerges from the nature of each card's benchmark profile. The GTX 750 is measured in cross-platform compute and graphics APIs, suggesting it was tested in legacy or heterogeneous workloads. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 9315 is its highest, indicating relative strength in general-purpose compute tasks. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 8078 and Metal score of 4274 show a card that handles modern low-level APIs, but with a substantial gap between compute-oriented OpenCL and graphics-oriented Metal results.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is measured only in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, a demanding modern rasterization test. With a score of 6269.5, it operates in an entirely different performance stratum. The database places it at the 36th percentile among all GPUs, while the GTX 750 sits at the 40th percentile. This seemingly close percentile ranking is misleading, as the two cards are separated by over a decade of architectural progress and target completely different workloads.

For users, the GTX 750 remains relevant for legacy systems, basic display output, and older DirectX 11-era games. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is positioned for high-end modern gaming, ray tracing, and 4K-class workloads, even though the database only captures one benchmark for it. The data indicates no scenario where the GTX 750 would be chosen for modern gaming performance; conversely, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER would be overkill for the kinds of tasks where the GTX 750 still functions.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is generational. The GTX 750 uses the GM107 chip on the Maxwell architecture, built on a 28 nm process at TSMC. It packs 1,870 million transistors into a 148 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 12.6M per mm². The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, also fabricated by TSMC but on a 5 nm process. Its 45,600 million transistors occupy a 378 mm² die, achieving a density of 120.6M per mm², nearly ten times higher.

The GTX 750 is a member of the GeForce 700 generation, with its predecessor being the GeForce 600 and its successor the GeForce 900. It is end-of-life. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER belongs to the GeForce 50-series, with no listed predecessor or successor, and is still active in production.

Feature support differs sharply. The GTX 750 has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, giving it hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads. The DirectX support tells the story: the GTX 750 supports DirectX 12 at feature level 11_0, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate at feature level 12_2. Both cards support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The memory subsystem is equally divergent. The GTX 750 uses 1024 MB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 80.19 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s, which is over eleven times the bandwidth. Clock speeds reflect the process advantage: the GTX 750 runs at 1020 MHz base and 1085 MHz boost, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER runs at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost.

Power and physical design are also worlds apart. The GTX 750 has a 55 W TDP, is single-slot, requires no power connectors, and suggests a 250 W power supply. It measures 145 mm in length. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP, is dual-slot, requires one 16-pin connector, and measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The GTX 750 has an average benchmark score of 7222 across three tests, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has an average score of 6270 from a single test. However, these averages are not directly comparable because they come from different benchmark suites.

Q: What is the transistor density difference between the two GPUs?

A: The GTX 750 has a transistor density of 12.6M per mm², while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER achieves 120.6M per mm². The newer card packs roughly 9.6 times more transistors per square millimeter.

Q: Does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. The GTX 750 has neither RT cores nor tensor cores, so it lacks hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration.

Q: How do the memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The GTX 750 provides 80.19 GB/s with 1 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides 896.0 GB/s with 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus. The newer card has over 11 times the bandwidth and 16 times the memory capacity.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The GTX 750 has a TDP of 55 W and requires no external power connectors. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Which card has a higher pixel rate?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s, while the GTX 750 has a pixel rate of 17.36 GPixel/s. The newer card is over 13 times faster in this metric.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every measurable specification. The GTX 750 is built on 28 nm with 1,870 million transistors, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 5 nm with 45,600 million transistors. Die size increases from 148 mm² to 378 mm². Transistor density rises from 12.6M per mm² to 120.6M per mm².

Clock speeds: the GTX 750 runs at 1020 MHz base and 1085 MHz boost, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER runs at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. Memory clocks are 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective) for the GTX 750 versus 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER.

Memory configuration: 1024 MB GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus versus 16 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus. Bandwidth jumps from 80.19 GB/s to 896.0 GB/s.

Compute resources: the GTX 750 has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It also adds 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, which the GTX 750 lacks entirely.

Throughput rates: pixel rate goes from 17.36 GPixel/s to 235.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate goes from 34.72 GTexel/s to 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32 compute goes from 1,111.0 GFLOPS to 43.94 TFLOPS, a nearly 40-fold increase. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also offers FP16 at 43.94 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the GTX 750 has no listed FP16 capability.

Power and physical: TDP rises from 55 W to 350 W. The GTX 750 is single-slot with no power connectors; the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is dual-slot with one 16-pin connector. Suggested PSU is 250 W for the GTX 750, with no figure listed for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Length goes from 145 mm to 304 mm. The GTX 750 uses PCIe 3.0 x16; the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs change from 2x DVI and 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a to 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Since there are no shared benchmark tests between the two cards, a direct head-to-head comparison is impossible from the recorded data. However, the database does provide context through each card's nearest rivals and percentiles.

The GTX 750, with an average score of 7222, sits at the 40th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile with an average score of 7203, a delta of 0.3 percent. The GTX 750 also edges out the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE (7171, delta 0.7 percent), the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 (7170, delta 0.7 percent), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (7157, delta 0.9 percent). These deltas are all under one percent, indicating that the GTX 750 is statistically tied with its immediate competition in this database.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, with an average score of 6270, sits at the 36th percentile. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 with an identical score of 6270, a delta of 0 percent. The other rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K620 (6282, delta -0.2 percent), the AMD FirePro W600 (6223, delta 0.8 percent), and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 (6327, delta -0.9 percent). Again, all deltas are within one percent, showing tight clustering around the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's score.

The most striking data point is the GTX 750's Geekbench OpenCL score of 9315, which is its strongest result. Its Vulkan score is 8078, and its Metal score is 4274. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's sole score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 is not directly comparable to any of these, as they measure different workloads and API performance.

The percentile rankings tell a nuanced story. Despite being separated by a massive architectural gulf, the GTX 750 ranks higher in the database at 40 percent versus the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 36 percent. This is likely an artifact of the benchmark selection: the GTX 750 was tested in legacy and cross-platform suites where it performs relatively well, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER was tested in a modern DX12 suite that may be more demanding relative to its peer group. The data does not suggest the GTX 750 is faster; rather, it reflects different test methodologies applied to different generations.

The compute gap is the clearest indicator of performance separation. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS dwarfs the GTX 750's 1,111.0 GFLOPS, a difference of roughly 39.5 times. Texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s versus 34.72 GTexel/s, about 19.8 times higher. Pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 17.36 GPixel/s, about 13.6 times higher. These figures, while not from the same benchmark, quantify the generational leap in raw throughput.